Another example of Europeans not indiginous to the land, attempting to lay claim to historical Palestine.
Actually the majority of Israeli Jews today are secular. Problems like this crop up due to the enormous influence of religious leaders in the early formative years when the Basic Laws were written. As time goes on however, the views of the secular majority are gaining ground via the power of the ballot box.also indicative of discrimination based on religious grounds, with some very clear statements suggesting that Israeli Jews wsh to preserve their separateness from others, to the extent of excluding them from business relationships, from the army (hmmm - reminds me a bit of the complaints against Islam), and also preventing intermarriage.
what exactly DOES Israel stand for?
also indicative of discrimination based on religious grounds, with some very clear statements suggesting that Israeli Jews wsh to preserve their separateness from others, to the extent of excluding them from business relationships, from the army (hmmm - reminds me a bit of the complaints against Islam), and also preventing intermarriage.
Another example of Europeans not indiginous to the land, attempting to lay claim to historical Palestine.
also indicative of discrimination based on religious grounds, with some very clear statements suggesting that Israeli Jews wsh to preserve their separateness from others, to the extent of excluding them from business relationships, from the army (hmmm - reminds me a bit of the complaints against Islam), and also preventing intermarriage.
what exactly DOES Israel stand for?
It was historically Israel long before it was ever called Palestine.
It was historically Canaan, long before it was ever called ''Israel".
I am aware of this. Nonetheless it is now Israel, and Israel it will remain.
That's a very nasty generalization there, you're not allowed to do that and it's borderline hate speech.
The article is speaking about a very very small community and you're making a reference to the entire group of Israeli Jews.
This generalization points at a clear illeberal behavior and even indicates on a far-right attitude, since you seek to label an entire group of people based on the action of a few.
What exactly DO you stand for?
Israel stands for the one place on Earth where Jews do not have to fear their own government. It is their ancient ancestral homeland and theirs by both right and current possession. They are there to stay; get used to it.
I am not Jewish, but if these people in the kibbutz wish to live among their own kind and are not breaking the law, I don't have a problem with it. It appears to me to be an internal Israeli matter, so let the Israeli's decide how to handle it.
I am aware of this. Nonetheless it is now Israel, and Israel it will remain.
Israel stands for the one place on Earth where Jews do not have to fear their own government.
.
Israel stands for the one place on Earth where Jews do not have to fear their own government.
also indicative of discrimination based on religious grounds, with some very clear statements suggesting that Israeli Jews wsh to preserve their separateness from others, to the extent of excluding them from business relationships, from the army (hmmm - reminds me a bit of the complaints against Islam), and also preventing intermarriage.
what exactly DOES Israel stand for?
bull****.
that is not anti semitism at all. This material SUGGESTS that.
if this is untrue, rather than attacking me - why don't you provide something concrete to counter it? or at least demonstrate that this is NOT indicative of Israeli Jews, but of a minority.
take your insults and shove them up your arse.
You've made a generalization, perhpas on the opinion of a very small minority (I do not even know who the hell you are referring to with those accusations), and have attributed those attitudes to an entire group of people (Israeli Jews)."Israeli Jews wish to preserve their separateness from others, to the extent of excluding them from business relationships, from the army (hmmm - reminds me a bit of the complaints against Islam), and also preventing intermarriage."
these are the same claims made about Islamic communities.
are you saying it is OK for jews, but not for Muslims?
Of course, there are always cases where preference or exclusion can be given on religious grounds - but when it comes to moving into a neighbourhood - is that OK in a so called democratic society?
I'd like to see someone in any other so called democracy say - we won't allow Jews/Muslims/Christians/Cninese/blacks etc to live in this neighbourhood.
would it be acceptable in the US?
Who said it's acceptable in Israel?
Lierberman is a racist hardliner by which even Netanyahu has had to make political agreements without his knowledge. The guy is an idiot.
Who's opposing and how ?
(this is an honest question because I really don't know and interested in learning from someone who lives in Israel)
With respect to Lieberman being a "hard-liner", he has yet to make any extreme move since he has entered the government's office as a FM.
So far the move that was considered the most extreme made by him was that he has proposed the loyalty law, a law that wished to punish with jailtime anyone who'd act against Israel's existence as either a Jewish or a Democratic state, a law that of course didn't get passed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?