teamosil
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2009
- Messages
- 6,623
- Reaction score
- 2,226
- Location
- San Francisco
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Re: What was accomplished by the Chick-fil-A threats, Appreciatoin day, and kiss ins
Yes. It is his right to preach bigotry. I would never want to see that right taken away from him. But, free speech also protects the rights of people who are disgusted by the hate he is spewing to respond by boycotting his business, protesting, and trying to drive him out of business.
He also is currently allowed to fund hate organizations. That will remain true at least so long as those organizations don't cross the line and end up on the terrorism lists.
Oh you know that isn't true as well as everybody else does. He was fighting for equal rights for gay people from day one, he just couldn't openly admit it without risking his electability until support for it crossed a certain threshold. Everybody knew that all along, yourself included.
Polygamists too. That said, polygamy is a choice where homosexuality is not, so it isn't quite as serious, but IMO the government shouldn't be involved in deciding who marries who. That is people's own choice. As long as they are consenting adults, it isn't the government's business.
That is his right, if he believes that to be the teachings of his religion.
Yes. It is his right to preach bigotry. I would never want to see that right taken away from him. But, free speech also protects the rights of people who are disgusted by the hate he is spewing to respond by boycotting his business, protesting, and trying to drive him out of business.
He also is currently allowed to fund hate organizations. That will remain true at least so long as those organizations don't cross the line and end up on the terrorism lists.
Obama was NOT for SSM until a couple of months ago, yet I heard no such criticism of his assertion that marriage is between ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN position before it "evolved".
Oh you know that isn't true as well as everybody else does. He was fighting for equal rights for gay people from day one, he just couldn't openly admit it without risking his electability until support for it crossed a certain threshold. Everybody knew that all along, yourself included.
Are the current marriage laws an "attack" on the rights of polygamists too or only on the GLBT folks?
Polygamists too. That said, polygamy is a choice where homosexuality is not, so it isn't quite as serious, but IMO the government shouldn't be involved in deciding who marries who. That is people's own choice. As long as they are consenting adults, it isn't the government's business.