teamosil
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2009
- Messages
- 6,623
- Reaction score
- 2,226
- Location
- San Francisco
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Re: What was accomplished by the Chick-fil-A threats, Appreciatoin day, and kiss ins
Again, there is no "other people's money" involved. All the people decide how much money we'll put in and what we'll use it for. If Americans were voting what to do with Canadians' money, you would have a point. But they aren't. We're deciding what to do with our own money. And one of the things that we choose to invest something like 2% of the money we chip in on is poverty amelioration. We are stupid to only invest that little. The country as a whole would be much richer, the companies much more profitable, etc, if we could knock out poverty like they've more or less done in most of the rest of the first world.
Yeah, we spend $14 billion a year on actual welfare- TANF, about $40 billion on food stamps and about $8 billion on WIC. So, that's $62 billion a year on the core poverty amelioration programs. There are 46 million people in poverty in the US. So, that's about $1,500 per person in poverty per year.
Again, get one person out of poverty and we gain $3 million in GDP.
Are you telling me that you think $1,500 is too much to spend to try to get $3 million? What kind of investment strategy do you follow lol?
Government decides on how much they want to take and if you are lucky you get a vote. Lets see how much that changes the argument you are facing. *Measuring* None. Ok, so its none. The argument was that the funds are being put towards helping individuals with the use of other peoples property. Taxes are to be used towards the protection of our are rights and liberties , but giving jim bob here getting food on my dime doesn't do that, does it?
Again, there is no "other people's money" involved. All the people decide how much money we'll put in and what we'll use it for. If Americans were voting what to do with Canadians' money, you would have a point. But they aren't. We're deciding what to do with our own money. And one of the things that we choose to invest something like 2% of the money we chip in on is poverty amelioration. We are stupid to only invest that little. The country as a whole would be much richer, the companies much more profitable, etc, if we could knock out poverty like they've more or less done in most of the rest of the first world.
Do you have any idea how much we spend on the poor and how much we get out? By any measurement that is not a good investment. You simply do NOT measure your overall investment by one hour of growth when the overall growth is nonexistent from such an investment. You clearly have no idea how much of this works.
Yeah, we spend $14 billion a year on actual welfare- TANF, about $40 billion on food stamps and about $8 billion on WIC. So, that's $62 billion a year on the core poverty amelioration programs. There are 46 million people in poverty in the US. So, that's about $1,500 per person in poverty per year.
Again, get one person out of poverty and we gain $3 million in GDP.
Are you telling me that you think $1,500 is too much to spend to try to get $3 million? What kind of investment strategy do you follow lol?