As I've said before--Zimmerman is a liar, a killer and a coward.....
Killer ~ yes. Nothing wrong with that.
Coward? ~ Only in your imagination. And as that is subjective, it matters not.
Liar? Has not been proven. So you are just wrong all over the place.
It matters to me, to my family, to my friends and to most fair-minded people....
I doubt it does, and what you say about fair minded folks ... those are, and have been, the ones who support Zimmerman. So you are wrong about that.
I don't consider myself uninformed, as I followed this case closely.....Just because you people did not give credence to Rachael's testimony, doesn't mean that the rest of us didn't believe her.....
Highly unlikely that you did.
As for DeeDee, she is, and was, a liar.
Why should the jury believe a liar who said she lied to not upset the very same person who was sitting in the Court room when she was testifying?
Why do you believe her, as she is a liar.
You honestly think she could hear wet grass?
Considering her lies, and the circumstances surrounding her account, you are fooling yourself if you believe anything she said.
Three of those jurors went into that jury room with their verdict of Not Guilty already reached..Three did not.
Wrong!
They all had reached a verdict.
Those three capitulated on one point and one point only, based on jury instructions which incorporated the stand your ground law---the mindset of Zimmerman at the second that he pulled the trigger.... I would bet that they now regret their decision, but it's too dam late..... There should have been a hung jury at worst, a manslaughter verdict at best.......
Following the law, is not capitulation.
And they didn't just go over the jury instructions. They went over the evidence first. They then went on to the law and then to the instructions.
And when a person is holding an opinion that is contrary to the law and it gets shown to them what the law says, they changed their opinion to conform with the law. That is all.
Had the law not been in Zimmerman's favor, you would have seen those three not-guilties, tuned into guilty of one of the others.
But as it was the law was in his favor.
No--that juror who spoke out showed her contempt for Rachael --her prejudice about "those" people, how "they" think and "their" environment......
Bs! She said she felt sorry for her.
You really need to listen to what she said in totality, not just want you want to hear.
In most other states he would have been found Guilty.....
Wrong!