- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
- Messages
- 8,555
- Reaction score
- 4,665
- Location
- Colorado Springs, CO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
And that's a lie. But, it's the root of your ideology. Right?
Regardless, only a ****ing low-life piece of **** would destroy the property of innocent citizens because he's mad at the government.
What lie?
You have been an unwavering defender of the officers in the Floyd incident. At every opportunity, you have attempted to make what happened to George Floyd nobodys fault but his, and that is simply not an accurate representation of what happened. High or otherwise, we have to consider what it was that brought the cops to the situation to begin with, which was the alleged passing of a fake bill. Last time I checked, that crime doesn't carry the penalty of death, and as such, it can be plainly stated that the officers grossly overreacted and that the incident didn't have to happen that way.
Usually, when someone defends something as vociferously as you have, it can be assumed they are in support of the action.
That all said, if you don't want to be accused of being okay with a guy dying for passing a fake bill, don't defend those who killed him as boisterously as you have. Not that hard.
As for your last sentence.....you are correct. But then again, you can't go back and find me ever defending those who have been looting and burning ****, so theres that....