- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 104,071
- Reaction score
- 84,041
- Location
- Biden's 'Murica
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
A no-knock warrant permits the officers to knock if in their judgment that would be preferable.
Nope. That's not the way it works.
The point is that your claim makes no difference.No idea why you posted this since it has nothing to do with what I posted.
You didn’t ask me anything .I asked you where you got the idea most Americans have guns. That is absolutely not true. Homeowners protect their properties by locking all exterior doors. Many people have alarm systems. Another common method is having guard dogs. If a burglar comes in the night, or when nobody is home, guns are totally useless.
It's neither. The law does not require perfect marksmanship from police firing in self-defense.I need to see proof there was no way they could have known Taylor was next to Walker and Walker fired the shot. If they did, it was murder. If they did not, it was manslaughter. Huge difference.
You can make a better argument that Kenneth Walker should not have fired a gun blindly. And I would hope somebody wouldn't fire a weapon at someone with a toddler beside them.The person they shot didn't fire on them. That is the problem here.
I think most people prefer that the police know who they are shooting at. There could have been a toddler standing there. Most people value human life, and "shoot first and ask questions later" is so 1886.
That is the presumption and reality is that all the facts are not known, but that is not the issue. The bigger question is whether police can invade a home then kill someone and then claim self defense. How is shooting an unarmed person self defense?Because of both - they were lawfully present
Only if they are fully identified.and have the right to defend themselves while serving a warrant.
There is conflicting testimony to that.THe boyfriend would have had the right to fire if this were actually a no-knock warrant but it seems that despite media coverage, they actually knocked and identified themselves as law enforcement (per witness corroboration to the grand jury). In that case, he does not actually have the right to fire.
You can make a better argument that Kenneth Walker should not have fired a gun blindly. And I would hope somebody wouldn't fire a weapon at someone with a toddler beside them.
It's neither. The law does not require perfect marksmanship from police firing in self-defense.
While her background is not what is portrayed in the liberal media that is not why I feel She is responsible for her death. She chose to hang with drugs, used her residence for criminal acts,
Nope. The officers were fired on (one was hit). That absolutely justified return fire in the direction of the sound.The law requires a specific target. Shooting in a general direction just because you heard something is illegal.
Considering they were wanting murder charges there will be riots.Breonna Taylor shooting: Louisville officer indicted on criminal charges
One of three officers involved in the Louisville, Ky., drug operation that led to the police shooting death of Breonna Taylor in March 2020 was indicted Wednesday on criminal charges.www.foxnews.com
Too much? Not enough?
Who ever said anything about a duty to die? You made that up. And there is absolutely no reason to call any American a Communist unless that person is self identified as one.
I am still waiting for proof the cop had no way of knowing who "fired at" him and Breonna Taylor was unarmed. If you can't prove it, you're wrong.
But a person she was closely involved with at her home fired at the police and she was right beside him. I completely understand that it is extremely tragic that she got caught in the crossfire but what do you expect the officers to do in that instance? Stand there and not return fire even after one officer was shot?You would hope that. But that isn't always the case.
They shot an unarmed woman who didn't fire at them. That's the one part of the story we all know. If she was my daughter or sister, I wouldn't have the "oh well, shit happens" attitude that others have.
Given the fact that they were not wearing any symbols of being a police enforcement unit.Nope. The officers were fired on (one was hit). That absolutely justified return fire in the direction of the sound.
You would hope that. But that isn't always the case.
They shot an unarmed woman who didn't fire at them. That's the one part of the story we all know. If she was my daughter or sister, I wouldn't have the "oh well, crap happens" attitude that others have.
Breonna Taylor shooting: Louisville officer indicted on criminal charges
One of three officers involved in the Louisville, Ky., drug operation that led to the police shooting death of Breonna Taylor in March 2020 was indicted Wednesday on criminal charges.www.foxnews.com
Too much? Not enough?
While her background is not what is portrayed in the liberal media that is not why I feel She is responsible for her death. She chose to hang with drugs, used her residence for criminal acts,
IMO the drug dealer/boyfriend used BT as a shield. Funny that this thug is who she wanted to become his baby momma.
I expect the cops will follow protocols and announce they are there and cops.But a person she was closely involved with at her home fired at the police and she was right beside him. I completely understand that it is extremely tragic that she got caught in the crossfire but what do you expect the officers to do in that instance? Stand there and not return fire even after one officer was shot?
Per the investigation, they did announce.Given the fact that they were not wearing any symbols of being a police enforcement unit.
nor did they announce that they were the police the person in the house saw a group of guys
heavily armed walking up to his house.
Given his neighborhood and where they lived he has a right under the 4th amendment to protect his home.
THe cops were completely wrong in his case.
the guy they were looking for was already in custody.
Nope. The officers were fired on (one was hit). That absolutely justified return fire in the direction of the sound.
Out of curiosity, assuming you own a firearm, if someone kicks in your door while you are sleeping do you respond with force or how long do you wait? At what point is a person allowed to use self defense in their own home?Nope. The officers were fired on (one was hit). That absolutely justified return fire in the direction of the sound.
So the police should stand there without returning fire (even after one had been shot) until they are dead? Got it.You have still not proven the police had no way of knowing who was armed and who was not or where Taylor and Walker were standing. I will not stop asking until I get an answer.
So Biden voters shot two more police officers. Another mostly peaceful night of violent civil war by the mostly peaceful Democrat terrorists.
Democrats are almost as peaceful as ISIS.
So the police should stand there without returning fire (even after one had been shot) until they are dead? Got it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?