- Joined
- Oct 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,541
- Reaction score
- 2,802
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
India is the 3rd largest Muslim country on the entire planet. It is far more likely that a Muslim border hopper will come from
India than Egypt, Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Morrocco,Tunisia or any other country that is 99% Muslim. In other words
for the sluggish minded it is not relevant what percentage of a country is Muslim. Iraq is 97% Muslim while India is 14% Muslim
however India has 6 times the Muslim population of Iraq therefore it is 6 times more likely that a Muslim
border hopper would come from India than from Iraq. Now that wasn't too hard to comprehend was it.
You said: "India has 6 times the Muslim population of Iraq therefore it is 6 times more likely that a Muslim border hopper would come from India than from Iraq."
I don't know why you said that, but you did. Not only that, but you said it with a certain smugness that is often employed by the self-deceived.
You deceived yourself into thinking you were making a good point, and that you were on topic. Neither is the case.
That fact that you were not on topic makes your point moot, I am afraid.
You answered, in your charming way, 'what the likely home country is for a person of the Muslim faith'. Which is nice, if only it had relevance.
I think you may have gotten off on the wrong foot when you launched with the creative 'Muslim border hopper' terminology.
The claim is that 3000 (+/-) border crossers are from India. For some reason, even though 86% of the population of Indian is non-Muslim, you are trying to make these individuals likely culprits in the made-up story about prayer mats.
I am afraid that if you want to claim these Indian migrants are Muslim you will need to provide more proof than what you and others have come up with so far.