- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,233
- Reaction score
- 197
- Location
- Denmark, Grena
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
1. I have never said a person does not have the right to defend themselves from attack.
2. I watched the video at least 3 times.
3. I have never said anything about it being 5 against 3.
4. I have only been speaking about the man punching and kicking a man when down. I have not made reference to what other people did as I did not see them.
Right, clearly you believe in activity which is criminal. That is such crap. Rationalising thugery.
I have never said the spitting was all right. I have simply said that it did not require a response of being punched and then kicked about the body as the person lay on the ground. You have made clear this is the sort of action you support and I have made clear that I do not.
He is sick. He needs to be convicted and possibly given psychological help. Now it might have been possibly to say it was just a reaction if he had just punched him, but the fact that he then went on to deliver serval kicks to the man lying on the ground shows that this man has done this kind of activity before. He is a thug and was caught on camera. That you applaud such activity concerns your own conscience.
and the only person I have been talking about is the thug who was beating up the guy. I have said, now three times, that once the man was being kicked on the ground it was impossible for me to make out what was happening. That is why I watched the video several times.
At the beginning the other BNP's made a half hearted gesture to stop him getting started but I certainly was unable to see what was going on after the man was getting the hell kicked out of him on the ground.
This is physical violence. You are becoming ridiculous.
No, I am afraid you are wrong. By law in self defence you can only use the amount of force needed for self protection. You are talking about vigilante revenge. The law does not allow that. You had better learn.
Ok your obviously way way off course. No point in debating the issue.