- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 85,607
- Reaction score
- 61,572
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
This serves no purpose other than to rally other ****ing Nazis.
This serves no purpose other than to rally other ****ing Nazis.
I agree with you but there's actually zero need to foreignize our own bigotry, it's always been with us.Talibornagain asshole.
This serves no purpose other than to rally other ****ing Nazis.
Yea, because letting minors get irreversibly harmed through medical intervention is a terrible idea? What's the data say? Something like 95% of kids grow out of the gender dysphoria views?
Not anymore!
Considering how homosexual identity was riddled out of the DSM for politically correct purposes and how transgenderism and homosexual identity are political allies, there's no good reason to believe medical professionals are unbiased experts on the issue."Major medical associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, have supported the use of gender-affirming care for transgender children, although doctors generally recommend waiting until a child reaches puberty to begin medications such as puberty blockers or hormone treatments, The Post has reported."
Link
Yet another example of Republikans bringing the power of the state between doctors and their patients.
Considering how homosexual identity was riddled out of the DSM for politically correct purposes and how transgenderism and homosexual identity are political allies, there's no good reason to believe medical professionals are unbiased experts on the issue.
If that's your argument, then the DSM in general isn't scientific. It's just a bunch of opinions on what qualifies as a functional mental state.Homosexuality was removed from the DSM because there was no science supporting its inclusion to begin with. Homosexuality was made a mental disorder due to bigotry, not science.
What's the data say? Something like 95% of kids grow out of the gender dysphoria views?
If that's your argument, then the DSM in general isn't scientific. It's just a bunch of opinions on what qualifies as a functional mental state.
If that's your argument, then the DSM in general isn't scientific. It's just a bunch of opinions on what qualifies as a functional mental state.
I'm saying the DSM should acknowledge how love is not love. Agape, eros, pragma, storge, ludus, philia, mania, and philautia are all different ways of loving people. Confusing those forms of love results in getting wires crossed among other forms of love.So what you're saying is the DSM is only scientific if it agrees with your bigotry?
I'm saying the DSM should acknowledge how love is not love. Agape, eros, pragma, storge, ludus, philia, mania, and philautia are all different ways of loving people. Confusing those forms of love results in getting wires crossed among other forms of love.
I'm saying the DSM should acknowledge how love is not love. Agape, eros, pragma, storge, ludus, philia, mania, and philautia are all different ways of loving people. Confusing those forms of love results in getting wires crossed among other forms of love.