- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 66,572
- Reaction score
- 22,195
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Why isn't it suspicious? They were not where they were suppose to be. They were suppose to be in a state warehouse. Are you saying someone disposing of them in a field isn't suspicious?You also said that is somehow suspicious and I am extremely confused as to how you arrived at that conclusion.
If you found obsolete machinery in a closet the normal thing to do is dispose of it. I don't understand how that is suspicious.
No, it's relevant.In other words, you think it’s irrelevant also, but you wanted to bring it up in this thread because you recognize all the other ideas you’ve posted are kinda batshit crazy, so why bother to post relevant info?
got it.
Sometimes bulk delivery drivers get bored or lazy. Sometimes they just drop off the bulk in a ditch somewhere instead of delivering individually. It's happened recently multiple times with regular mail carriers, and it happens with newspapers and flyers and everything else using that model.Why isn't it suspicious? They were not where they were suppose to be. They were suppose to be in a state warehouse. Are you saying someone disposing of them in a field isn't suspicious?
What would you call it?
Here is one ]possible scenario: Someone had access to the storage warehouse, and stole them. After finding out they were no longer supported newer ballots, they disposed of them in a safer manner than it would be to try to return them.
If that were the case, the polling places that were suppose to receive them would have said something.Sometimes bulk delivery drivers get bored or lazy. Sometimes they just drop off the bulk in a ditch somewhere instead of delivering individually. It's happened recently multiple times with regular mail carriers, and it happens with newspapers and flyers and everything else using that model.
You’re right. Warnock should have won outright.No, it's relevant.
A crime was committed involving several voting machines. The most likely possibility is someone set out to create illegal ballots, and failed. Who knows. Maybe they took newer system also and didn't completely fail.
Why isn't this suspicious?
I wonder how long it will be before Trump fires Barr for being 'disloyal.'
Georgia officials certify election results showing Biden win
ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia's governor and top elections official on Friday certified results showing Joe Biden won the presidential race over Republican President Donald Trump, bringing the state one step closer to wrapping up an election fraught with unfounded accusations of fraud by Trump and his...apnews.com
Georgia officials certify election results showing Biden win
ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia’s governor and top elections official on Friday certified results showing Joe Biden won the presidential race over Republican President Donald Trump, bringing the state one step closer to wrapping up an election fraught with unfounded accusations of fraud by Trump and his supporters.
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger certified results reported by the state’s 159 counties that show Biden with 2.47 million votes, President Donald Trump with 2.46 million votes and Libertarian Jo Jorgensen with 62,138. That leaves Biden leading by a margin of 12,670 votes, or 0.25%.
Later Friday, Gov. Brian Kemp certified the state’s slate of 16 presidential electors. In an announcement streamed online, Kemp did not clearly endorse the results. Instead he said the law requires him to “formalize the certification, which paves the way for the Trump campaign to pursue other legal options and a separate recount if they choose.”
================================================================================
The Republican governor hasn’t stepped forward to defend the integrity of this year’s elections amid attacks by Trump and other members of his own party, who claim without evidence that the presidential vote in Georgia was tainted by fraud.
Trump believes he was robbed.
Why isn't it suspicious? They were not where they were suppose to be. They were suppose to be in a state warehouse. Are you saying someone disposing of them in a field isn't suspicious?
What would you call it?
Here is one ]possible scenario: Someone had access to the storage warehouse, and stole them. After finding out they were no longer supported newer ballots, they disposed of them in a safer manner than it would be to try to return them.
Why isn't it suspicious? They were not where they were suppose to be. They were suppose to be in a state warehouse. Are you saying someone disposing of them in a field isn't suspicious?
What would you call it?
.
Trump’s quest to overturn election runs into quiet resistance from local and state Republicans
President Trump’s effort to persuade state and local Republicans to help him in overturning the election has so far run into a quiet resistance that could mark a coming end to his attempt at an unprecedented power grab.
The Republican-led Board of Supervisors in Maricopa County, Ariz., voted unanimously Friday to certify the county’s election results, with the board chairman declaring there was no evidence of fraud or misconduct “and that is with a big zero.”
The top GOP lawmakers in Pennsylvania, where counties must submit their official results by Monday, have said they have no role in deciding the winner of the state’s electoral college votes, writing in an op-ed last month that the law “plainly says that the state’s electors are chosen only by the popular vote of the commonwealth’s voters.”
==========================================================
Wait. Doesn't that mean that they could send only Trump electors since people in the state voted for him? I'm sure it will be fine. Here's how they pick electors in PA: Of the 50 states, all but two award all of their presidential electors to the presidential candidate who wins a plurality of the popular vote in the state & PA is not one of those two.
I saw Guiliani on the news the other day and they asked him for proof and he went on about how he had soooo much proof but he said he wouldn't share it with the reporters because they would either lie and/or miss-report it.Tucker Carlson bashes Trump attorney Sidney Powell for lack of evidence in fraud claims: ‘She never sent us any’
As Fox News host Tucker Carlson noted on Thursday night, he’s more than willing to give airtime to outlandish claims. “We literally do UFO segments,” he said.
But even Carlson said he was fed up with the total lack of evidence produced by Sidney Powell, one of the Trump campaign’s attorneys, for her unfounded allegation that electronic voting systems had switched millions of ballots to favor President-elect Joe Biden.
“We invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour,” Carlson said. “But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”
Carlson also noted: “She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”
===========================================================================
Tucker was angry because Trump's other lawyer would send him no proof of her allegations.
Well, that much is true at least.I saw Guiliani on the news the other day and they asked him for proof and he went on about how he had soooo much proof but he said he wouldn't share it with the reporters because they would either lie and/or miss-report it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?