• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Was The Last Movie You Watched and Rate it!

I just saw The Great Gatsby. Good story and the set was incredible but the acting and the dialog were really terrible. Very contrived.
 
I just saw The Great Gatsby. Good story and the set was incredible but the acting and the dialog were really terrible. Very contrived.

I'm waiting for the book version to come out.
 
I saw that one the other day. I thought it was okay on the whole. Like you said, it wasn't the best I'd ever seen, but it was competent in most regards.

My only real complaint with the movie was that I didn't really care for Amber Heard's character.

She was gorgeous. Don't get me wrong. I just didn't buy her at all as a "super spy femme fatale." She's just came off like a kid who was trying too damn hard to be edgy.

To be honest, this was an impression I got from the movie in general in a couple of other scenes as well.

yeah, but I still liked it. I wouldn't have been pissed if I'd paid for it. I liked how they interjected a little humor into it, too. And loved the daughter. She was awesome.
 
Just re-watched the Godfather trilogy.

Godfather I: Simply epic. There's a few holes in the plot that any movie how brilliant it would be will have. The awe of Brando's aura is simply indescribable in words. Al Pacino also flawlessly portrayed his character. The two towering legends in Hollywood in my opinion in one movie. Just simply epic. I'm actually rehashing what others would have said before me but it needed to be said AGAIN.
That being said, the plot holes:
1) Sollozzo: How come a low-level drug dealer who comes asking for money and protection can almost assassinate the most powerful criminal figure in the country, a man who supposedly owns half the politicians, police, and judges in New York? Then Sollozzo can go further and kill off Luca Brasi (which is another big plot hole, it would have been incredibly obvious to the Tattaglias and Sollozzo that he was fake. Brasi served the Corleones loyally for years if not decades, then suddenly comes whining about them right after Sollozzo got rejected? When he had the Barzinis and the Straccis and the Cuneos to turn to?), kidnap Tom Hagen (who apparently despite being one of the top leaders of the biggest crime family in the US has not a single bodyguard) and wage war. If he had so much power and money he wouldn't have gone to the Corleones in the first place and he owns a ****ing police captain for cripe's sake. He could have gone to any other of the 3 crime families and have gotten what he wanted. Also if he had so little he wouldn't have dared wage war on the Corleones without being out of his mind. I know I'm bitching about it and that it's simply a movie but there are so many holes and it's just about Sollozzo.
2) Sonny's death: Sonny's death is somewhat plausible. Hell if I knew my sister was beaten the crap out for the second time, I would have gone racing to kill the bastard who did it, wartime or not. Yet how the Don's reaction was full of holes. A war against the four families would have taken its toll. He could have ended it, then and now, but he had to wait until Sonny got killed. The war was costing the Corleones huge amounts of money but he had to wait until one of his sons got killed. Rizzi's hand in Sonny's death was also so obvious, I watched the later half of the Godfather when I was watching it for the first time thinking that he would have been killed automatically. I only knew that he was still alive when Michael was meeting about moving to Las Vegas. I mean, Rizzi beat up Connie and Sonny conveniently gets killed with perfect timing while racing away to kill Rizzi?
3) The Baptism murders: So the Corleones which was such on a steep decline that one of its closest friends who got entrusted with even one of the Corleones snubbed them could somehow kill off the heads of the other four families with the guy who snubbed the Corleones for good measure. If killing off five of the most important criminal figures in the US could be so easy, why didn't somebody else do it long time ago? Sure the Corleones took time to prepare but if a novice Don could pull it off, anybody else could do it. Those who were killed also had virtually no bodyguards and no checking of the locations before-hand. Only Barzini did and he had just one. ONE. That's the guy who planned the downfall of the Corleones and was supposedly smartest of the bunch, and he had the genius to have only one bodyguard. Stracci, Moe Greene (who also invented Las Vegas but couldn't get a bodyguard), and Cuneo all had no bodyguards. Well Cuneo could have had his in the elevator with him but he didn't send anybody else up before to check if the coast was safe. Standard bodyguard procedure anybody?
BTW Cracked poked holes in the Godfather for all the wrong reasons. Their problems were that how could Tom Hagen creep to the stalls, cut off a horse's head, sneak into a studio head's bedroom and put the head all without being detected. Well obviously he had some henchmen with him who would have plenty of street experience. A consigliere would never go anywhere alone and he probably knew that he would be rejected so he had to bring some muscle. It's even mentioned somewhere that Luca Brasi did it. Then it has the complaint about Sonny's death, about how the assassins had to wait hours in a sweltering toll booth just to kill him. Well obviously Connie called her mother right away after the beating who also told Sonny right away. They didn't have to wait hours, they could anticipate when Sonny would come within ten minutes. If they could block Sonny's car with perfect timing, they could pull that off.
That being said, don't get me wrong. The Godfather I is still one of my favorite movies of all time. It's damn near perfect-the baptism scene, the opening (Bonasera), the acting, even the soundtrack. It's just that I'm the type of person who can't help but poke holes at the plot. Rating? 9.9/10.

Godfather II: The parallel storyline is also perfect. While I personally found the Godfather I to still be the best, I could see why people view the sequel as one that exceeds the original. The acting, everything was great. The transition from Marine to ruthless Godfather was also great (though by the end of Godfather I, Michael wasn't so naive was he?). There were also little plot holes except some minor ones such as why the Rosato brothers wouldn't simply just shoot Pentageli instead of going to the trouble of garroting him. That being said it was as great as the first. 9.9/10

Godfather III: I couldn't see the hate people have for it. Admittedly it wasn't as great as the first two but it was still damn near perfect. Michael from ruthless Don to an old man full of remorse for what he did and trying to redeem himself was great. The only problems I had was that the plot was too much redundant. The Godfather I and the Godfather II was essentially that the family was running smoothly until some external threat came to briefly threaten it then get killed off. Vincent also portrayed a new type of gangster, one that wasn't as polished enough, wasn't as thoughtful and careful, and had little respect though he could have done it more effectively. Mary and Anthony were useless except for Mary getting killed off. Some plot holes like in Godfather I, how the Corleones could essentially kill multiple important people seemingly without flaw, and why Michael would choose to go for Immobiliare while there were other lucrative businesses. Not as great as the first two, but I still thought it was better than the majority of crap that Hollywood churns out. 8.5/10.
 
The Monuments Men. I love Clooney, Damon, Goodman, Bonneville et al, but I couldn't like this movie much. It didn't really seem to know whether it was being serious, or it couldn't decide to be serious and leave out all the gags. Poorly constructed and badly scripted. It's a shame because the subject matter was good.

4/10.

I read that same thing somewhere else. Really too bad, it seems like a great subject and a first rate cast. Think I'll save my money on this one.
 
Just re-watched the Godfather trilogy.

Godfather I: Simply epic. There's a few holes in the plot that any movie how brilliant it would be will have. The awe of Brando's aura is simply indescribable in words. Al Pacino also flawlessly portrayed his character. The two towering legends in Hollywood in my opinion in one movie. Just simply epic. I'm actually rehashing what others would have said before me but it needed to be said AGAIN.
That being said, the plot holes:
1) Sollozzo: How come a low-level drug dealer who comes asking for money and protection can almost assassinate the most powerful criminal figure in the country, a man who supposedly owns half the politicians, police, and judges in New York? Then Sollozzo can go further and kill off Luca Brasi (which is another big plot hole, it would have been incredibly obvious to the Tattaglias and Sollozzo that he was fake. Brasi served the Corleones loyally for years if not decades, then suddenly comes whining about them right after Sollozzo got rejected? When he had the Barzinis and the Straccis and the Cuneos to turn to?), kidnap Tom Hagen (who apparently despite being one of the top leaders of the biggest crime family in the US has not a single bodyguard) and wage war. If he had so much power and money he wouldn't have gone to the Corleones in the first place and he owns a ****ing police captain for cripe's sake. He could have gone to any other of the 3 crime families and have gotten what he wanted. Also if he had so little he wouldn't have dared wage war on the Corleones without being out of his mind. I know I'm bitching about it and that it's simply a movie but there are so many holes and it's just about Sollozzo.
2) Sonny's death: Sonny's death is somewhat plausible. Hell if I knew my sister was beaten the crap out for the second time, I would have gone racing to kill the bastard who did it, wartime or not. Yet how the Don's reaction was full of holes. A war against the four families would have taken its toll. He could have ended it, then and now, but he had to wait until Sonny got killed. The war was costing the Corleones huge amounts of money but he had to wait until one of his sons got killed. Rizzi's hand in Sonny's death was also so obvious, I watched the later half of the Godfather when I was watching it for the first time thinking that he would have been killed automatically. I only knew that he was still alive when Michael was meeting about moving to Las Vegas. I mean, Rizzi beat up Connie and Sonny conveniently gets killed with perfect timing while racing away to kill Rizzi?
3) The Baptism murders: So the Corleones which was such on a steep decline that one of its closest friends who got entrusted with even one of the Corleones snubbed them could somehow kill off the heads of the other four families with the guy who snubbed the Corleones for good measure. If killing off five of the most important criminal figures in the US could be so easy, why didn't somebody else do it long time ago? Sure the Corleones took time to prepare but if a novice Don could pull it off, anybody else could do it. Those who were killed also had virtually no bodyguards and no checking of the locations before-hand. Only Barzini did and he had just one. ONE. That's the guy who planned the downfall of the Corleones and was supposedly smartest of the bunch, and he had the genius to have only one bodyguard. Stracci, Moe Greene (who also invented Las Vegas but couldn't get a bodyguard), and Cuneo all had no bodyguards. Well Cuneo could have had his in the elevator with him but he didn't send anybody else up before to check if the coast was safe. Standard bodyguard procedure anybody?
BTW Cracked poked holes in the Godfather for all the wrong reasons. Their problems were that how could Tom Hagen creep to the stalls, cut off a horse's head, sneak into a studio head's bedroom and put the head all without being detected. Well obviously he had some henchmen with him who would have plenty of street experience. A consigliere would never go anywhere alone and he probably knew that he would be rejected so he had to bring some muscle. It's even mentioned somewhere that Luca Brasi did it. Then it has the complaint about Sonny's death, about how the assassins had to wait hours in a sweltering toll booth just to kill him. Well obviously Connie called her mother right away after the beating who also told Sonny right away. They didn't have to wait hours, they could anticipate when Sonny would come within ten minutes. If they could block Sonny's car with perfect timing, they could pull that off.
That being said, don't get me wrong. The Godfather I is still one of my favorite movies of all time. It's damn near perfect-the baptism scene, the opening (Bonasera), the acting, even the soundtrack. It's just that I'm the type of person who can't help but poke holes at the plot. Rating? 9.9/10.

Godfather II: The parallel storyline is also perfect. While I personally found the Godfather I to still be the best, I could see why people view the sequel as one that exceeds the original. The acting, everything was great. The transition from Marine to ruthless Godfather was also great (though by the end of Godfather I, Michael wasn't so naive was he?). There were also little plot holes except some minor ones such as why the Rosato brothers wouldn't simply just shoot Pentageli instead of going to the trouble of garroting him. That being said it was as great as the first. 9.9/10

Godfather III: I couldn't see the hate people have for it. Admittedly it wasn't as great as the first two but it was still damn near perfect. Michael from ruthless Don to an old man full of remorse for what he did and trying to redeem himself was great. The only problems I had was that the plot was too much redundant. The Godfather I and the Godfather II was essentially that the family was running smoothly until some external threat came to briefly threaten it then get killed off. Vincent also portrayed a new type of gangster, one that wasn't as polished enough, wasn't as thoughtful and careful, and had little respect though he could have done it more effectively. Mary and Anthony were useless except for Mary getting killed off. Some plot holes like in Godfather I, how the Corleones could essentially kill multiple important people seemingly without flaw, and why Michael would choose to go for Immobiliare while there were other lucrative businesses. Not as great as the first two, but I still thought it was better than the majority of crap that Hollywood churns out. 8.5/10.

Nice post. I love the Godfather trilogy. Watched it for the first time about 15 years ago, on a snowy Saturday in upstate New York. My favorite is 2, with 1 closely following behind. While I loved 3 also, it didn't come close to 1 or 2. I do love me some Andy Garcia, though, so that covered any manner of sins portrayed by 3.

And yeah, at the end of 1, Michael wasn't so innocent. I am not a Pacino fan at all, but I absolutely loved him in these movies. He was just so suave, so debonair, so badass.
 
Beyond The Black Rainbow

This movie absolutely sucked.

0/10
 
Watched "Enders Game" yesterday.....pretty good adaptation of the book, good special effects and decent acting.

7/10
 
Via Netflix.....The Pianist from 2002.

Great case study on the human will to survive.

9 of 10
 
I watched Lego movie today. 7.5/10.

It was a good fun movie, but I need to rewatch on video to get all the gags. Also the ending wasn't too strong but I see what they were going for. They need to take a lesson from Super Smash Bros on how to blend "real life" with fiction.
 
Via Netflix.....The Pianist from 2002.

Great case study on the human will to survive.

9 of 10

Love this movie. Am a huge fan of Adrian Brody, and I actually have The Pianist on order from Best Buy. It's out of stock on Bluray, but supposed to ship the first week of March.

My old boss lives a few houses down from a castle he bought in upstate New York, and he like gets out in the community and meets people. Very down to Earth guy, they said. Let's people take his picture with them and everything.
 
Some kind of porn featuring teen girls in amateur auditions.

Mainstream? Pompeii. Last weekend. Hell yeah.
 
Some kind of porn featuring teen girls in amateur auditions.

Mainstream? Pompeii. Last weekend. Hell yeah.

:lol:

Pompeii was pretty good? We are thinking of going to see it one day this week. We didn't get to catch it over the weekend.
 
Most recent "Platoon".(for the....a lot of times) At the theater "Book Theif".
 
:lol:

Pompeii was pretty good? We are thinking of going to see it one day this week. We didn't get to catch it over the weekend.

Yeah I really enjoyed it, but my favorite movies are historical epics with plenty of sword fighting and preferably in 3D, so....
 
Robocop- 5/10
Meh, most of the violence has been toned down and the satirical elements which made the original so good was wiped out as well. Not a bad film but not a good one either.

Monuments Men- 6/10
Too episodic and light hearted, it would have been better had they been serious about it.

As far as DVDs go currently watching Bob le Flaumbeur, classic French caper film, so far so good. Almost finished season 1 of Hannibal (disgusting).

My imdb reviews and ratings for movies and tv if anyone's interested: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur12550421/
 
Last edited:
I honestly didn't realize that movie was out yet. I'm going to have to see that this weekend. :lol:

It's a good movie. Kind of tries to be a mix between Gladiator and Titanic. The story doesn't match up to Titanic, and the action doesn't quite live up to Gladiator, but in all it was an excellent movie.

And of course, I'm a huge fan of 3D Imax.
 
I just watched Good Vibrations. It's a great movie about the punk music scene in Northern Ireland during the worst years of the Troubles. Great performances, loads of fantastic punk rock, and really terrible haircuts.
 
I just watched Good Vibrations. It's a great movie about the punk music scene in Northern Ireland during the worst years of the Troubles. Great performances, loads of fantastic punk rock, and really terrible haircuts.

Sounds like a movie my stiff little fingers could appreciate.
 
I just can't gear up any interest in seeing Pompei. I know how it ends. volcano erupts and everybody dies......
 
Back
Top Bottom