Isn't that a really high-risk place to go?
Maybe he wants to see the Indians?
You're missing the point. Yes, every President travels around to other countries. However, not every President decides to go to a country where he needs 34 WARSHIPS to protect him and his crew. What is SO important that he needs to be there in person?
You're missing the point. Yes, every President travels around to other countries. However, not every President decides to go to a country where he needs 34 WARSHIPS to protect him and his crew. What is SO important that he needs to be there in person?
Again, what is SO IMPORTANT that he has to be there in person? He's putting HIS life at risk along with all of his crew. Why?
You are almost certainly exaggerating the risk.
Oh really? Is that why the US military is taking every single precaution including building a kilometer-long, above-ground, bomb-proof tunnel just so Obama can go to the Ghandi Museum? The risk is real in Mumbai.
sounds to me like that tunnel will go far to negate that risk then.
Oh really? Is that why the US military is taking every single precaution including building a kilometer-long, above-ground, bomb-proof tunnel just so Obama can go to the Ghandi Museum? The risk is real in Mumbai.
The Pentagon did not mince words in dismissing as “absolutely absurd” and “comical” media reports from Indian news outlets that the US Navy was sending 34 warships off the coast of Mumbai as part of the security preparations for President Obama’s upcoming trip to India.
Well, duh. But why even go to all the trouble? To see a museum??