- Joined
- Apr 17, 2018
- Messages
- 21,321
- Reaction score
- 10,532
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Just about everyone who served in the CIA can trace their lineage back to OSS. It was from out of the OSS that the CIA was born.Another person who had served in the OSS was the CIA's section chief in Dallas.
That's some real whackadoodle shit there.A key name in the Kennedy Assassination was James Jesus Angleton, chief of counterintelligence for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 1954 to 1975.
And here's a video laying it all out.
That mail order Italian rifle was one that was STANDARD ARMY issue, used during WWII with great success ... just because Oswald bought it cheaply does NOT mean it was a "cheap", badly made one as your post tries imply ...A mail order Italian rifle with a bolt action was used to kill JFK and wound Gov. Connolly is a bit of a stretch for me.......
PS this thread won’t last long here......
Yes, I know.Just about everyone who served in the CIA can trace their lineage back to OSS. It was from out of the OSS that the CIA was born.
Yes. of course, Americans want to know whether the murder of the two Kennedy brothers was a plot or just a coincidence.Do Americans want to know the answers?
Do you think that when LBJ's stuff is finally released, there may be answers?Yes. of course, Americans want to know whether the murder of the two Kennedy brothers was a plot or just a coincidence.
Yes, of course, Americans want to know whether the 2020 Presidential election was honest or rigged.
But we are unlikely to find the definitive answer in the near future.
Who knows?
Maybe the truth will be come out in the next century.
That's some real whackadoodle shit there.
What's even more whackadoodle is the people who accept the 'Official explanation' from a Government that has been proven to lie to their citizens day after day.
Oswald's actions after the assassination were indicative of a person who knew what he had done. But didn't really have a plan or firm idea in his mind as to what he was going to do or what the end point was or would be or even what it would look like. Because fate had landed the opportunity of his lifetime right into his lap and he had just a few days to make his decision and form a plan. In end he decided he could not just pass it up. Whatever the cost.Well I guess maybe. Perhaps.
The "lone nut" theory (which has Oswald as it's lone nut) loses ground with me:
Be-caws!
Why aren't there like almost daily assassination attempts? Yes, the secret service is better than ever and detect threats long in advance. But the SS is not protecting anyone other than former Presidents and the current leaders of the executive branch. They aren't protecting the house member from the California 47th district much less state and local officials.
- We have more nuts than ever
- We have more guns than ever
- The nuts we have have access to more capital than ever
- The guns that the nuts have access to are more powerful than ever
- We have more access to data which, one would think, would cause the nuts to be more unhinged than ever
So I'm a pass on the theory that Oswald was just some disgruntled nut job who just fell ass backwards into the whole thing. His actions after he shot JFK, cab, bus, walking, changing clothes, getting his gun..not the actions of someone who was not aware of what he was doing.
Come on dude, I mean really. I have heard plenty of pretty wild JFK assassination conspiracy theories over time. But being killed in order to protect secretly acquired alien technology has to be right up there in the top ten looney tunes list of them all. Tip of the cap on that one!What's even more whackadoodle is the people who accept the 'Official explanation' from a Government that has been proven to lie to their citizens day after day.
So, he leaves $169 cash, nearly five week's pay after payroll withholding, with his wife and goes to work on 11/22 without his revolver, carrying a paper bagged "package" that the only two witnesses who claimed to have seen Oswald carrying it, stubbornly swore under oath was less than 30 inches long, despite "encouragement" from LEO interrogators.Oswald's actions after the assassination were indicative of a person who knew what he had done. But didn't really have a plan or firm idea in his mind as to what he was going to do or what the end point was or would be or even what it would look like. Because fate had landed the opportunity of his lifetime right into his lap and he had just a few days to make his decision and form a plan. In end he decided he could not just pass it up. Whatever the cost.
Oswald's actions after the assassination were indicative of a person who knew what he had done. But didn't really have a plan or firm idea in his mind as to what he was going to do or what the end point was or would be or even what it would look like. Because fate had landed the opportunity of his lifetime right into his lap and he had just a few days to make his decision and form a plan. In end he decided he could not just pass it up. Whatever the cost.
Oswald's actions after the assassination were indicative of a person who knew what he had done. But didn't really have a plan or firm idea in his mind as to what he was going to do or what the end point was or would be or even what it would look like. Because fate had landed the opportunity of his lifetime right into his lap and he had just a few days to make his decision and form a plan. In end he decided he could not just pass it up. Whatever the cost.
Why pollute a thread with that?Neither did I mention the space aliens, but they were involved.
There was a huge reason - it's complicated, but it's a combination of a number things about Oswald's mental state. He wanted to be a hero, and he was aware of Cuba, which he supported, viewing Kennedy as a threat. It was a one time historic opportunity, and we were handed a gift at confirming his assassin mentality with his attempt on Walker.There was no reason at all for Oswald to kill JFK unless he was doing it at the behest of someone else.
Why not, the space aliens makes as much sense as LBJ, Castro, the Cuban exiles, the mob, the CIA and the FBI.Why pollute a thread with that?
I've never heard the Kennedy assassination as a southern white thing. Interesting.
Truthfully, it isn't hard to find someone who was enemies with Kennedy.
1) The CIA hated him for pulling out of the Bay of Pigs invasion at the last minute.
2) The mafia hated him cause his dad was one of them, then his son Bobby attacked them as Attorney General.
3) The vice-president was one of the most vicious guys around. Guess who became president?
4) The Cuban-Americans who wanted to overthrow Castro in Cuba wanted him dead.
5) The whole thing with Marilyn Monroe was sketchy. Who else was he banging that we don't know about?
6) The military wanted to go into Viet Nam but he was holding them back.
7) The Republicans hated that he stole the election. (with the help of Daley in Chicago)
Lots of people benefitted from his death. Hard to place the blame on any one entity.
No, they don't. I don't want to be as uncivil as to say you are making a fool of yourself on it, but.Why not, the space aliens makes as much sense as LBJ, Castro, the Cuban exiles, the mob, the CIA and the FBI.
No, they don't. I don't want to be as uncivil as to say you are making a fool of yourself on it, but.
7. He did not steal the election. He might have stolen Illinois, and he bought the West Virginia primary that drove Hubert Humphrey out.
Most historians are in agreement that Daley voted the graveyards and that won JFK Illinois, which won him the presidency.
That is simply false. JFK could have won without Illinois.
You are correct, I just ran the numbers.
No, it did not. Lose Illinois, he still wins the presidency. Edit: I see this was already corrected. Kennedy's electoral win was 303-219; Illinois had 27 votes.Most historians are in agreement that Daley voted the graveyards and that won JFK Illinois, which won him the presidency.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?