• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:204]Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize following Israel-UAE deal

roguenuke said:
So you are complaining about your thread getting posts that are mostly pointing out the insignificance of this nomination and how ridiculous it is to think that the UAE/Israel deal in any way equates to "Peace in the Middle East".

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

This isnt my thread. I can see the confusion though with lefties quoting me every 4 minutes with Nobel anger.
 
Last edited:
AlphaOmega said:
This iant my thread. I can see the confusion though with lefties quoting me every 4 minutes with Nobel anger.
Click to expand...
So you took over someone else's thread with Trump praises that are easy to counter or with this type of lack-of-substance post that just complains about other posters or exaggerates other peoples replies.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
AlphaOmega said:
Peace in the middle east. If anyone deserves a Nobel it is Donald Trump.
Click to expand...

"Peace in the Middle East" is still light years away. On August 16, 2020, the Financial Times editorial board wrote that the accord, rather than delivering peace, is likely to exacerbate Palestinians' sense of hopelessness and produce more problems in the future as the Israeli and US governments have "shown no interest in a fair resolution of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict.
 
snakestretcher said:
No, my career was in medicine where we don't concern ourselves with superficial appearances, but with what actually matters.
Click to expand...

Like making pompous posts on some random chat forum?
 
roguenuke said:
So you took over someone else's thread with Trump praises that are easy to counter or with this type of lack-of-substance post that just complains about other posters or exaggerates other peoples replies.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I took over nothing. You lefties are then ones quoting me every 4 minutes with Nobel anger. Its hilarious how this caused lefties to apoplectic! Why you even forgot about the military story! lmao
 
Interesting. We'll see if he wins, I guess.
 
snakestretcher said:
No, my career was in medicine where we don't concern ourselves with superficial appearances, but with what actually matters.
Click to expand...

lol, good hygiene is not practiced in your medicine? lol, you cleaned toilets at a hospital did you?

dude, you sound like a insecure 8th grader.

I don't know a doctor that does not take care of his nails.

and a man with manicured nails is like an aphrodisiac to women.

LOL, you of course would not know nor have an interest

You are obviously more a shot and a beer women kind a guy.... very classy.
 
AlphaOmega said:
What exactly is funny about Trump being nominated for a peace prize for brokering peace between Iarael and the UAE which with no doubt will cause other nations to follow suit? Cmon...implode for me...you are almost there.
Click to expand...

The deal is B.S. Israel promises to not formally annex and exercise sovereignty over the land it has for all intents and purposes already annexed and exercises sovereignty over while granting nothing to the Palestinians. It's just a show for shoring up political support for Netanyahu and Trump.

In his Israeli press conference announcing the deal, Netanyahu said annexation was "still on the table" and that it was something he is "committed to."
 
Last edited:
snakestretcher said:
Awesome but utterly meaningless. Firstly there was no war between the UAE and Israel; and secondly the 'achievement' was merely a re-establishing of diplomatic relations; not exactly a stunning breakthrough. I have my doubts that the Nobel Committee will have the same opinion as the nominator.
Click to expand...

What Trump has failed to do to earn it is what Obama did to earn his. Bow to Muslim rulers.

 
jpn said:
The deal is B.S. Israel promises to not formally annex and exercise sovereignty over the land it has for all intents and purposes already annexed and exercises sovereignty over while granting nothing to the Palestinians. It's just a show for shoring up political support for Netanyahu and Trump.

In his Israeli press conference announcing the deal, Netanyahu said annexation was "still on the table" and that it was something he is "committed to."
Click to expand...

How can Netanyahu annex the UAE?
 
AlphaOmega said:
I took over nothing. You lefties are then ones quoting me every 4 minutes with Nobel anger. Its hilarious how this caused lefties to apoplectic! Why you even forgot about the military story! lmao
Click to expand...
Yet your first sentence of your first post in this thread made an exaggerated claim "Peace in the Middle East." and for some reason you find it strange or hostile for others to respond to that exaggerated, stupid claim? This is the very first thing you posted in this thread.

What do you think the word "implosion" means?

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
jpn said:
"Peace in the Middle East" is still light years away. On August 16, 2020, the Financial Times editorial board wrote that the accord, rather than delivering peace, is likely to exacerbate Palestinians' sense of hopelessness and produce more problems in the future as the Israeli and US governments have "shown no interest in a fair resolution of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict.
Click to expand...

"I think he has done more trying to create peace between nations than most other Peace Prize nominees," Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian Parliament, told Fox News in an exclusive interview after nominating Trump for the award.

Tybring-Gjedde, a four-term member of Parliament and chairman of the Norwegian delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, said in his letter nominating Trump the agreement could be a "game-changer" in the Middle East because other countries will follow in the footsteps of the UAE.
Trump Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize | Newsmax.com
 
roguenuke said:
Yet your first sentence of your first post in this thread made an exaggerated claim "Peace in the Middle East." and for some reason you find it strange or hostile for others to respond to that exaggerated, stupid claim? This is the very first thing you posted in this thread.

What do you think the word "implosion" means?

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Oh my bad, are the UAE and Israel at war? Its a yes or no
 
jpn said:
The deal is B.S. Israel promises to not formally annex and exercise sovereignty over the land it has for all intents and purposes already annexed and exercises sovereignty over while granting nothing to the Palestinians. It's just a show for shoring up political support for Netanyahu and Trump.

In his Israeli press conference announcing the deal, Netanyahu said annexation was "still on the table" and that it was something he is "committed to."
Click to expand...

Lefties are going apoplectic! Forum porn!
 
AlphaOmega said:
Oh my bad, are the UAE and Israel at war? Its a yes or no
Click to expand...
No, they werent at war before that. Pretty sure the UAE hasn't been at war with Israel.

Israel–United Arab Emirates relations - Wikipedia

In fact, their relations improved in 2010 from "cool". Cool relations is not war. They could barely be considered hostile toward one another in the past 50 years.

And no, it is not a yes or no question because it does require context. If I asked "are we at war with Mars" the fact that no known sentient beings live on Mars is very relevant information to answering such a question.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
roguenuke said:
Actually, this was about UAE deciding to throw Trump a bone because they and Israel prefer Trump as President. Israel and the UAE did all the work here. They both saw the advantages of allowing Trump staff/administration to appear to
Click to expand...

You people are hilarious.

So, again, if your argument is true, why did UAE and Israel wait until August of Trump's 4th year, and why did the Trump admin broker the deal if they didn't need the help? :lamo
 
snakestretcher said:
Accomplished what, exactly? Re-establishing nothing more than diplomatic relations between two countries who were never at war with each other, and you think that is deserving of a Nobel peace prize?
Click to expand...

Establish embassies and free travel between Israel and an Arab state... no big deal, eh? :roll:

I mean, look at all the peace Obama brought to the Middle East...

.. oh, wait....
 
jmotivator said:
You people are hilarious.

So, again, if your argument is true, why did UAE and Israel wait until August of Trump's 4th year, and why did the Trump admin broker the deal if they didn't need the help? :lamo
Click to expand...
Why would two countries that want Trump elected, noticing he could benefit from getting kudos from a deal between them that "involved" the US, possibly helping in his election campaign wait until a couple months prior to that election to do this? Is that seriously your question?

Theres an episode of the TV series Chuck that actually helps demonstrate this where Chucks sister goes into the store where he works, makes a purchase of hundreds of dollars and when asked if anyone helped her she states his best friend, Morgan helped her (he didnt even know she was in the store at the time) so he could get credit in a store contest they were having and he was doing very poorly in. Boom her hundreds of dollars in purchases were credited to him because she wanted to help him. Pretty much the same concept.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
roguenuke said:
Why would two countries that want Trump elected, noticing he could benefit from getting kudos from a deal between them that "involved" the US, possibly helping in his election campaign wait until a couple months prior to that election to do this? Is that seriously your question?

Theres an episode of the TV series Chuck that actually helps demonstrate this where Chucks sister goes into the store where he works, makes a purchase of hundreds of dollars and when asked if anyone helped her she states his best friend, Morgan helped her (he didnt even know she was in the store at the time) so he could get credit in a store contest they were having and he was doing very poorly in. Boom her hundreds of dollars in purchases were credited to him because she wanted to help him. Pretty much the same concept.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


HAHAHA!!!

Sooooo... Trump had everything to do with their decision to open diplomatic relations and travel... but Trump also had nothing to do with it? :roll: :lamo

And that amazing self own gets boosted by relating it to the TV show Chuck? :roll:

Like I said, you guys are hilarious.
 
Trump was nominated by a far-right lunatic and Putin apologist. Just FYI.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom