What is a weak argument is ignoring Treasury data and the line items in the budget and what taxes fund those line items
That isn't what Treasury shows which is in the link I gave you to bea.gov. That is liberal rhetoric and false. FIT and CIT along with excise taxes were over 2 trillion dollars to fund 1.6 trillion, how does that generate a deficit
The budget is more than 1.6T.
No it doesn't, it lowers spending
How does it do that? If the government gets less revenue that doesn't force it to spend any less. It forces the government to borrow more. All government spending is already approved. It does not depend on revenue.
and that is the number one component of GDP and the source of state and local revenue. You have more withholding taken out of your paycheck thus less spendable income and less sales and property taxes to the state
Property taxes are collected regardless of how much take-home pay workers get. There is no correlation.
it is entitlement spending that is creating the deficit not tax cuts
Entitlements go mostly to the poor who spend pretty much 100% of what they get. That means entitlement spending gets pumped very directly right back into the economy, thus increasing GDP.
Every taxpayer got a tax cut as the rates show. Do you that tax rates were cut? In spite of treasury data and the link I gave you that data you continue to post false information, why?
I made no error. Word substitution trickery does not constitute a false statement on my part.
Corporations employ people who pay taxes so before making dumb statements like this review the FIT and CIT revenue from the treasury site I gave you and tell me how that creates deficits
OK, I am growing really tired of these insults. I do not insult you and I would appreciate a straight up discussion about the subject without all the personal denigration. If that is not possible then I shall have to seek someone else who can discuss this from the conservative view who can do so on the basis of the merit of the argument. (Am I seeking the impossible?)
It should be noted that a decision to go personal, or insulting, strongly suggests a lack of confidence in the argument made. t
The insults are thrown in as a distraction, or an attempt to elicit an emotional response. I have only so much patience for that and then I simply stop talking to a poster who does this.
Basically, if you want to have a discussion with me, it must be on a mutually respectful basis. Now, I have been patient on this, but my patience will run out, I assure you.
that is a lie, stop promoting it. the data makes you look foolish? What is it about liberalism that creates your kind of loyalty?
I am beginning to get the impression that a mutually respectful discussion on this matter is not possible with you. Back off or I'm not wasting any more time with you. I enjoy life too much to go online for this kind of grief.