- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 75,699
- Reaction score
- 39,983
- Location
- USofA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
A deal wherein the Taliban renounce, stop sheltering, or otherwise turn on AQ.not what?
A deal wherein the Taliban renounce, stop sheltering, or otherwise turn on AQ.not what?
Except no, they weren’t. The founding fathers didn’t round up and slaughter British or Tory civilians en masse.
So, haven't really followed this.
Is this an historic quiet withdrawal, or one of those historic rooftop helicopter evacuation things?
your language is so terse I still don't understand you....nevermindA deal wherein the Taliban renounce, stop sheltering, or otherwise turn on AQ.
Except no, they weren’t. The founding fathers didn’t round up and slaughter British or Tory civilians en masse.
The heck they did not. The American tories and patriots hunted each other down ruthlessly.
The western powers, particularly the UK and Russia and the US, simply refuse to understand that you can kill Afghanis but you can't subdue the for any amount of time without them coming right back at you. They are murderous, deceitful, and absolutely committed to freedom.
The Afghan Campaign: A novel, by Steven Pressfield and Caravans, a novel by James A. Michener and The Far Pavilions, a novel by M. M. Kaye, are the best western fiction for introducing the western mind and intellect to the complex and confusing world of Afghanistan. Even today, only 19% of the population is literate.
“Freedom” Trying to pretend the Taliban are fighting for “freedom” is particularly ludicrous.....and no, Patriots and Tories did not randomly round up each other’s civilians and slaughter them en masse. People on the left simply refuse to understand that just because a group of insurgents is fighting the West, it doesn’t make their actions justified.
It won't work and we will see US helicopters fleeing the roof of the US embassy again.The only real way for this to work out is for Afghanistan to have a powerful enough military that they can fight the Taliban themselves. Since the Taliban seem to be willing to sign this deal, I'm not hopeful at all because all I see is the US decreasing our presence to the delight of the Taliban who will, at the appropriate time, start trying to overthrow the Afghan government. The only thing the Taliban get out of this deal is a decreased US presence, which is exactly what they want. To live peaceable with the Afghans? Not a snowball's chance.
Why are we making deals with terrorists?
It won't work and we will see US helicopters fleeing the roof of the US embassy again.
The reason that the Taliban are powerful is that they are United. The reason the rest of Afghanistan is weak, is they are not united and squabble among themselves. Massoud could unite the opposition, which is why the Taliban assassinated him. There is no new Massoud, so hence in 14 months the Taliban will start taking back the country.
Sent from my Honor 8X
Maybe because they contacted us?!?
"... The United States and the Taliban have endured decades of hostility and mistrust. Previous talks have faltered. This effort only became real for the United States when the Taliban signaled interest in pursuing peace and ending their relationship with al-Qaida and other foreign terrorist groups. They also recognized that military victory was impossible. I then asked Ambassador Khalilzad to serve as our lead negotiator to gauge the Taliban’s sincerity. ..."
Secretary Michael R. Pompeo At Afghanistan Signing Ceremony - United States Department of State
We should not be making deals with terrorists
Then how do you end terrorism when the terrorists offer to end terrorism?!? There is always a give and take ... see IRA
"After the end of the Irish Civil War (1922–23), the IRA was around in one form or another for forty years, when it split into the Official IRA and the Provisional IRA in 1969. ... It is now inactive in the military sense, while its political wing, Official Sinn Féin, became the Workers' Party of Ireland."
The Taliban, too, is interested in a seat at the political table in Afghanistan.
You don't negotiate with terrorists. Should we negotiate with MS13?
Then how do you end terrorism when the terrorists offer to end terrorism?!? There is always a give and take ... see IRA
"After the end of the Irish Civil War (1922–23), the IRA was around in one form or another for forty years, when it split into the Official IRA and the Provisional IRA in 1969. ... It is now inactive in the military sense, while its political wing, Official Sinn Féin, became the Workers' Party of Ireland."
The Taliban, too, is interested in a seat at the political table in Afghanistan.
.....no. The Taliban is interested in ruling Afghanistan. They are not interested in being folded into GIRoA as it currently stands.
“Freedom”
Trying to pretend the Taliban are fighting for “freedom” is particularly ludicrous.....and no, Patriots and Tories did not randomly round up each other’s civilians and slaughter them en masse.
People on the left simply refuse to understand that just because a group of insurgents is fighting the West, it doesn’t make their actions justified.
Did MS13 approach us and offer to end their "terrorism"?
I see you've got nothing to say about the end of the Irish Republican Army terrorist group ... (smile).
The Taliban are fighting for freedom; just their version of freedom, where good and honest Pashtun can live in their homes, not having to pay funds to the thieves on Kabul, not have to listen to Tajiks or any other foreigners, and do whatever the **** they want.
You don't remember when the Taliban were in control of Afghanistan do you?
I do actually. I just understand why the Taliban have kept fighting for this many years.
Because that is how they view themselves, fighting for Pashtun values against foreign invaders.