- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 22,962
- Reaction score
- 3,948
- Location
- UK
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Dishonest non-debater finally gets that he will not be debated.
There's hope yet.
There's no hope of any honesty in your own commentary as will be demonstrated for the umpteenth time here yet again
and, to repeat, Hamas clearly states its desire to liberate Palestine and expel the Jews, obliterating the state of Israel in the process.
Holding that little fact to be irrelevant to any discussion on the I/P conflict clearly shows what anyone engaging in such absurd line of argument is actually made of.
How and where did I say it was " irrelevant" ? I said there are rejectionists on both sides and they should be treated the same/similar precisely because of their rejectionist positions
The lie of not having used Likud in comparison easily refuted by the response to the above statement on Hamas, reading as
And LIkud papers and commentators have said they will never allow a Palestinian state in the OPTs.........if you are against rejectionism at least be consistent.
and thus constituting the exact equation that the poster now denies having made.
Flog that strawman for all your worth lol
You don't quote directly precisely so you can present your own dishonest use of strawmen and misrepresentation without the obvious being seen. Only the dumb will be fooled by such obvious tactics that show a genuine fear of direct debating. You have been burned on so many occasions I can fully understand the caution but I definitely do not respect the cowardice in those tactics