Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
Likely a lot of the private owners would enjoy not having illegals cutting through their property. And there's always eminent domain.Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
Sand and scrub brush, how much can it be worth?
Likely a lot of the private owners would enjoy not having illegals cutting through their property. And there's always eminent domain.
A couple things opponents of Trumps walls forgot...
1-The fact that we already use border walls and
2-Their blind and nodding approval of the previous administrations use of and erection of border walls and fences.
The idiots that oppose border security oppose it solely due to the fact that the current president is the proponent. ****ing liars and hypocrites the lot...
Sand and scrub brush, how much can it be worth?
Conservatives for eminent domain? There is no hypocritical line the Trumpcult won't cross.
Still, expect a major fight that I don't think most conservatives will have the stomach for:
“I’ve said since 2013 that building a wall from sea to shining sea is the most expensive and least effective way to secure the border. Of particular concern, is that we’ve seen no estimates to date that include the total costs of land acquisition (as would be required through eminent domain) or of subsequent legal battles with landowners,” - Republican Representative Will Hurd
“If they’re building a wall in Texas, it means they are building on private land, which means it’s harder, a lot harder,” - Republican Representative John Carter
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/donald-trump-border-wall-eminent-domain/521958/
Uh, they're Republicans, not necessarily CONSERVATIVES, and the OPINIONS of a couple of republicans in a far left publication doesn't mean much.Conservatives for eminent domain? There is no hypocritical line the Trumpcult won't cross.
Still, expect a major fight that I don't think most conservatives will have the stomach for:
“I’ve said since 2013 that building a wall from sea to shining sea is the most expensive and least effective way to secure the border. Of particular concern, is that we’ve seen no estimates to date that include the total costs of land acquisition (as would be required through eminent domain) or of subsequent legal battles with landowners,” - Republican Representative Will Hurd
“If they’re building a wall in Texas, it means they are building on private land, which means it’s harder, a lot harder,” - Republican Representative John Carter
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/donald-trump-border-wall-eminent-domain/521958/
How much can (beach property) sand be worth?
Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
that is sand and water....dang little water til you hit the Rio Grande....
A couple things opponents of Trumps walls forgot...
1-The fact that we already use border walls and
2-Their blind and nodding approval of the previous administrations use of and erection of border walls and fences.
The idiots that oppose border security oppose it solely due to the fact that the current president is the proponent. ****ing liars and hypocrites the lot...
You say words like "idiots" and "liars", but you seem to not address the fact that some border fences =/= a contiguous enforceable wall. I wouldn't recommend complaining about words like "contiguous" or "enforceable", because then you would be complaining abut the concept of a wall that has a fraction of a chance of working.
But hey...
Hey, the term "idiot" seems to be acceptable these days.
Oh, the term? Yes, the term itself is quite acceptable.
Depends who or what one is talking about, no?
As long as human beings are on the receiving end, no.
Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
Even if Trump found a way to get the funds for his monument to himself (the Trump Wall), whether that be publicly (Congress), privately (GoFundMe :lol, or through other means (Mexico:lamo) he would still have to fight the Texas landowners. Over 2/3 of the border is private or state-owned. How many property owners are conservatives willing to sacrifice for a wasteful project, I wonder?
The government already owns the land that the border sits on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?