Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever justifie

[Saboteur]

It is against forum rules to insult other members or call them names...Please refrain from doing so.........Thanks

Don't you need to bring one of yer kids to church so they can suck off the clergy members?

 

[Vader]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

Don't you need to bring one of yer kids to church so they can suck off the clergy members?

What a sickning response. Have you no shame?

:shock:

 

[Vader]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

I would say Yes.

Most definately.
Without a doubt.

But, only if they were a country that posed a threat to the peaceful world. (i.e. North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, other wacko Islamo-maniac nations, Venezuela, Cuba, etc).

The Saudi's aren't really as a much a threat as North Korea and Iran are. The Saudis are not likely to use such weapons on innocent people; whereas North Korea and Iran most definately are.

If said pre-emptive strikes were on Iran or North Korea, I would support them.

 

[Vader]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

It is against forum rules to insult other members or call them names...Please refrain from doing so.........Thanks

Drop'em to the deck, Chief.

 

[ProudAmerican]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

The Saudi's aren't really as a much a threat as North Korea and Iran are. The Saudis are not likely to use such weapons on innocent people; whereas North Korea and Iran most definately are.

If said pre-emptive strikes were on Iran or North Korea, I would support them.

not too mention, he left out Iraq.

whether or not they actually posed a threat to the entire world, one thing is for sure.......THE WORLD DEFINATELY THOUGHT THEY DID.

the left likes to act like Iraq was no threat and everyone knew it. fact is, there are many direct quotes out there that prove the left, the right, and the UN ALL THOUGHT IRAQ WAS A THREAT.

If we attacked NK tomorrow, and then found out they had been bluffing all along......you can bet he would take them off his list.

hindsight is so wonderful.

 

[Captain America]

Good point PA. Is NK bluffing like Saddam was? Can we afford not to call their bluff?

 

[Saboteur]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

What a sickning response. Have you no shame?

:shock:

It's no shame to battle evil whenever one comes across it.

What's a the mattow no pickin' on Navy Pwide? 'Cuz he's jus' a retired muderer of innocent Vietnamese women children?

"Po' Navy He's jus' a good ol' boy what killed 'dem gooks in duh name o' gawd"

 

[Goobieman]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

It's no shame to battle evil whenever one comes across it.

Unless you're GWB, or a conservative -- then you get laughed at when you bring up the notion of 'evil'.

 

[Saboteur]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

Unless you're GWB, or a conservative -- then you get laughed at when you bring up the notion of 'evil'.

Navy Pride: Demon on earth. Just like all child molesting catholics.

 

[Caine]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

not too mention, he left out Iraq.

whether or not they actually posed a threat to the entire world, one thing is for sure.......THE WORLD DEFINATELY THOUGHT THEY DID.

the left likes to act like Iraq was no threat and everyone knew it. fact is, there are many direct quotes out there that prove the left, the right, and the UN ALL THOUGHT IRAQ WAS A THREAT.

If we attacked NK tomorrow, and then found out they had been bluffing all along......you can bet he would take them off his list.

hindsight is so wonderful.

So, your saying that Iraq is a government that we should be concerned about obtaining nukes and using them on others, even with all the help they have recieved from the international community, and more specifically THE U.S.???

If it isn't obvious why I left out Iraq, maybe you should keep up to date. Iraq is not run by Saddam anymore..... :roll:

 

[Caine]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

Don't you need to bring one of yer kids to church so they can suck off the clergy members?

Are you trying to get banned?

This is unacceptable. I don't care if me and Navy Pride don't get along.

This is totally unacceptable.

 

[Saboteur]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

Are you trying to get banned?

This is unacceptable. I don't care if me and Navy Pride don't get along.

This is totally unacceptable.

Yes I am.....

 

[Justagurl]

While we were off chasing non-existent WMD in Iraq, North Korea and Iran have been busy. And who are we ( the USA ) to say what countries are not responsible enough to have nuclear weapons? Especially since the US is the only country in the world to have used Nuclear/Atomic Weapons ?

There are already enough Nuke's in the world to destroy the planet several times. We have Nuclear Subs with ballistic missiles and we probably have tactical nukes in South Korea. We threaten to use force to keep countries from developing nukes even though the USA, Russia, China, India, England, France, and Pakistan have WMD's. What a bunch of hypocrisy and it's obviously failing.

It makes so much more sense to pursue a missile defense system and to stop invading countries. Wars only breed more wars and lead to the development of better weapons. It's one thing to have a strong military as a deterrent and yet another to use it aggressively.

Nukes in South Korea Link ?

 

[Kelzie]

Don't you need to bring one of yer kids to church so they can suck off the clergy members?

Moderator's Warning:

This is absolutely not acceptable. Take it to the basement next time. Of course, if you really wanted to get banned, all you'd have to do is follow this warning up with some smart *** response. The ball's in your court.

 

[Saboteur]

Crap! I just got 4 measly warning points out of 20. Commiting forum suicide is too much work.

 

[Kelzie]

Crap! I just got 4 measly warning points out of 20. Commiting forum suicide is too much work.

Here's an idea. Exert some teeny amount of self control and don't log on if you don't want to be here.

 

[Navy Pride]

Don't you need to bring one of yer kids to church so they can suck off the clergy members?

Here we go bashing Christians.........I may get a gig for this but you are really gross........

 

[Navy Pride]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

Drop'em to the deck, Chief.

He is not worth the effort my friend........He makes outrageous comments sitting safely behind his computer.................You can bet he would never make the same comments to a members face.......

 

[earthworm]

well, you can deal with idiots BEFORE they have nukes, or after they have them.

clearly, the left would much rather wait until after they have them. many on the left would actually rather wait until after they use them.

its mind boggling really.

Disagree, left or right, up or down have nothing to do with this.
It is simply a matter of studying ones history and knowing man..
Ostriches will ignore the problem, and will try appeasement ( which has been proven over and over never to work)...
Eagles will see a problem and will attack and ask questions later - if at all.
Do the tin-horns in North Korea or in Iran think they can be another Hitler ???

 

[ProudAmerican]

So, your saying that Iraq is a government that we should be concerned about obtaining nukes and using them on others, even with all the help they have recieved from the international community, and more specifically THE U.S.???

dont look now, but so did North Korea. what difference does that make?

If it isn't obvious why I left out Iraq, maybe you should keep up to date. Iraq is not run by Saddam anymore.....

it was clearly obvious to me.

you dont want to look like the hypocrite you are.

you support action against NK because YOU THINK they tested a nuke. if we invaded, and then found out it was not a nuclear test, and they didnt have nuclear capability, you would be screaming at how Bush misled us to war with NK.

again, hindsight is awesome.

 

[Saboteur]

Here's an idea. Exert some teeny amount of self control and don't log on if you don't want to be here.

The thing is I want to be here. But when the first post I see on a new thread is this;

well, you can deal with idiots BEFORE they have nukes, or after they have them.

clearly, the left would much rather wait until after they have them. many on the left would actually rather wait until after they use them.

its mind boggling really.

I'm gonna go off the deep end. How long is debate politics going to put up with this?

 

[Saboteur]

Here we go bashing Christians.........I may get a gig for this but you are really gross........

If YOU are going to hang out here ALL day bashing liberals, YOU better be ready to get it right BACK!

 

[ProudAmerican]

I'm gonna go off the deep end. How long is debate politics going to put up with this?

compared to

Don't you need to bring one of yer kids to church so they can suck off the clergy members?

Id say my post was very tame.

if you dont like my comments, feel free to leave anytime. dont let the door hit ya on the way out.

 

[DeeJayH]

WOW :shock:
I am shocked that so far not one person has voted no on this poll
it seemed like a no brainer to me
but somedody usually goes against common sense, if only for arguments sake

DP unites :2party:

even if it is only 15 so far :mrgreen:

 

[Caine]

Re: Is a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear weapons capability ever just

dont look now, but so did North Korea. what difference does that make?

We invaded North Korea and installed a democratic government and trained thier military? Since when???

it was clearly obvious to me.

you dont want to look like the hypocrite you are.

you support action against NK because YOU THINK they tested a nuke. if we invaded, and then found out it was not a nuclear test, and they didnt have nuclear capability, you would be screaming at how Bush misled us to war with NK.

again, hindsight is awesome.

And you see why I call you out on your rabid partisanship? All the rabid conservatives on this website make claims to know what someone would think in this sitaution, or that, or they just outright claim to know someone else's position or how they would react because of some little donkey pictures under thier name. And you wonder why people call you out on being a rabid partisan lapdog? I would be surprised if anyone on this forum gave you any credibility when you make outlandish statements like this and claim I take up a position on an issue when I have never stated I would.

The title and question ask If we would support a preemptive strike to destroy a nation's nuclear capability. It doesn't "speculate" as to whether or not they have a nuclear capability. It flat out says that they do. I would support such a strike if the intelligence (AND ALL OF THE INTELLIGENCE) was taken into consideration, or more specifically, if that nation boasted about having nukes to the entire world.

Your reading into things too much. Not just reading into the question too much, but also trying to put words in people's mouths.

Its pathetic. Stop that bullshit.

Oh yeah, and if we are so worried that Iraq is going to get a nuclear bomb and use it on our allies while we are trying to support them by building thier military and helping set up our government, What is the point of being there?