• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Have Israel used chemical weapons???

Apocalypse

DEATH TO ANTARCTICA!!!
DP Veteran
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
20,699
Reaction score
6,479
Location
Israel
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
White phosphorus is not classified as a non-conventional weapon. It is used by the majority of advanced countries in the world, including the US, to light up fields or create smokescreens for engaging forces. Israel has not used it to "murder civilians" nor did it deliberately target any civilians at all during the 2009 Gaza campaign.
 

SBu

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
636
Location
Washington State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist

Celtipp

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
A protocol to the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons bans the use of white phosphorus as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations or in air attacks against enemy forces in civilian areas.
 

CanadaJohn

Canadian Conservative
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
28,799
Reaction score
20,472
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
There are lots of inconsistencies and just plain hypocrisy in international relations on all sides. Israel is one of a handful of nations that has not signed on to the international ban on the use of chemical weapons but the west doesn't criticize them for it. In addition, from what I've seen lately, the three leading nations in stocks of chemical weapons are considered to be the US, Russia, and then Syria.

Isn't it somewhat odd that the US and Russia are now negotiating to take control and destroy all of Syria's chemical weapons? One could argue that the US and Russia hasn't used these weapons to kill civilians or even combatants in a war, but then we really don't know what Russia has done over the years or inside it's own country. And if the use of the weapons not the holding of the weapons is the crime, why doesn't this same standard hold for nuclear weapons? After all, the US is the only nation that has actually used such a destructive weapon and all other nations who have them seem to hold them as a deterent against attack.

This is simply the hypocrisy of power geopolitics - he with the biggest and most guns can demand behavioural changes in others. This is not to say that what's going on in Syria isn't disgraceful, just that it's understandable why those that aren't powers in the west are distrustful of the motives and actions of those powers in the west.
 

Excon

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Messages
40,615
Reaction score
9,086
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
A protocol to the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons bans the use of white phosphorus as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations or in air attacks against enemy forces in civilian areas.

The Israeli military says it is to stop using artillery shells with white phosphorus to create smokescreens on the battlefield.
This is allowed activity.
 

MadLib

monstrous vermin
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
6,248
Reaction score
2,439
Location
Upstate New York
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
I was saying the other day that I don't agree with the use of WP in civilian areas, but that doesn't make it a chemical weapon.
 

Serenity

Stay Human
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
30,582
Reaction score
28,654
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
The injuries white phosphorus inflicts are terrible, however you describe it.
 

ecofarm

global liberation
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
133,426
Reaction score
43,221
Location
Miami
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
There's nothing white phosphorous can do that a bomb cannot. I see no reason for Israel to employ it instead of bombs, except in attempt to provide concealment.
 

wolfie

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
3,229
Reaction score
461
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
There's nothing white phosphorous can do that a bomb cannot. I see no reason for Israel to employ it instead of bombs, except in attempt to provide concealment.

I don't know what the outrage is about..America has used chemical weapons incessantly...

So it must be OK for you to use them??
 

Apocalypse

DEATH TO ANTARCTICA!!!
DP Veteran
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
20,699
Reaction score
6,479
Location
Israel
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
The injuries white phosphorus inflicts are terrible, however you describe it.

Regular bombs are way more terrible and lethal. Bullets are too. War is terrible.
 

ecofarm

global liberation
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
133,426
Reaction score
43,221
Location
Miami
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I don't know what the outrage is about..America has used chemical weapons incessantly...

So it must be OK for you to use them??

That's fundie muzzie nonsense. I can't believe someone would try to excuse chemical genocide on the grounds that the US does it "incessantly".

I find it amusing that some people completely discount Saddam's past and pretend a utopia would exist in Iraq if not for the US and, at the same time, pretend that ancient history in the US is evidence of policy today.
 
Last edited:

wolfie

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
3,229
Reaction score
461
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
That's fundie muzzie nonsense. I can't believe someone would try to excuse chemical genocide on the grounds that the US does it "incessantly".

I find it amusing that some people completely discount Saddam's past and pretend a utopia would exist in Iraq if not for the US and, at the same time, pretend that ancient history in the US is evidence of policy today.

Look at the proof..we invaded these countries..the result is teetering on a global war ..

We haven't won anything..we've lost!!
 

ecofarm

global liberation
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
133,426
Reaction score
43,221
Location
Miami
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Look at the proof..we invaded these countries..the result is teetering on a global war ..

Yet you refuse to consider Saddam's history and instead substitute a fantasy utopia as the alternative. That's disconnected and contradicts your narrative about the US.
 

ChrisL

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
47,571
Reaction score
16,958
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate
I think the reason the chemical weapons are considered worse is because they are not as accurate as our bombs are. Also, the wind or certain elements can carry these poisons and just by breathing, people you have no intention of killing can die too. Does that make sense?
 

wolfie

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
3,229
Reaction score
461
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Yet you refuse to consider Saddam's history and instead substitute a fantasy utopia as the alternative. That's disconnected and contradicts your narrative about the US.

I know it's an awful thing to say..but he kept them in check..

What the hell is happening in Syria??

I have visited Tunisia since the '' Arab spring''..you won't believe what's going on over there!!
 

ecofarm

global liberation
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
133,426
Reaction score
43,221
Location
Miami
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I know it's an awful thing to say..but he kept them in check..

He killed 1,000,000 Iraqis over 20 years (just counting the big stuff), 50k per year.

Yet, you don't have a problem with that?

What the hell is happening in Syria??

You've no idea, do you.

I have visited Tunisia since the '' Arab spring''..you won't believe what's going on over there!!

I am not impressed by tourism-based arguments.
 

wolfie

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
3,229
Reaction score
461
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
He killed 1,000,000 Iraqis over 20 years (just counting the big stuff), 50k per year.

Yet, you don't have a problem with that?



You've no idea, do you.



I am not impressed by tourism-based arguments.

Of course you are not interested in ''tourist based observations''..you have never been there!!

As far as Syria is concerned..I have a great idea..let's keep our mother humping noses out of it!!!
 

rocket88

Mod Conspiracy Theorist
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
44,814
Reaction score
20,220
Location
A very blue state
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

ecofarm

global liberation
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
133,426
Reaction score
43,221
Location
Miami
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Of course you are not interested in ''tourist based observations''..you have never been there!!

Claiming to have been somewhere does not make ones position credible. Tourism means nothing. I lived in Europe and Africa, for years.

Tourism arguments are inherently deeply flawed. They amount to hearsay of engineered propaganda.


As far as Syria is concerned..I have a great idea..let's keep our mother humping noses out of it!!!

You think that's your idea?

ps. "mother humping noses"? Sounds personal.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom