Yes, we have two terrible candidates. At least we know Trump has been a successful leader. As for Hillary, not sure she has been successful at much of anything. She has failed as SOS, didn't do much at all in Congress, and her failures with national security and keeping secret information safe has been, well let's just say she was able to avoid indictment on those charges.
Let's not forget that she wants to raise taxes on us too. Got to love that, like they're not high enough already.
Successful leader? Trumps great at marketing and being a personality. As far as business I'm not quite sure how much we know about him. He basically just rents his name out to bidders. Like Trump ties. They stick trump on cheap ties imported from China and put some gold leafing on them and all of a sudden that makes him a business genius? ****, Kim Kardashian can put her name on products and sell them, but I wouldn't hire her as my chief economist, let alone vote her in as president. You think he can run the country because he's successfully built some buildings? There's plenty of giant business moguls across the country speaking out against Trump, and these are people that actually understand the economy.
As for Hillary, she didn't fail as SOS. She was in there during an extremely tumultuous time and came away from it about as well as anyone could have. When looking at performance I ask myself "do I think another qualified person would have had any better of an outcome?" and I don't think so. I like the nuclear deal which she supported as SOS and apparently handled a little bit of the earlier negotiations, I think considering how much the middle east was destabilized from the Iraq war, she held i together as well as anyone could have. No one would have came in and stopped all fighting in the middle east as SOS. That's just not reality.
In congress she sat on numerous important committees and most importantly, gained knowledge on all the issues. I don't consider the mark of a successful congressperson to be "how many bills did you sponsor and get passed". She sat on those committees, debated these issues day in and day out, sat through all of the meetings etc. She knows the issues inside and out. A while back during the primary I saw that between Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, they had 2 bills that they had sponsored and had gotten passed. That doesn't mean that these guys didn't add language to bills, debated the bills, spoke for or against bills, debated issues on various committees IE: the actual nitty-gritty day in day out work of the senate.
With secret information, she should be embarrassed for doing something as stupid as using a private server, but as of right now theres no evidence that any enemies rec'd any classified info through her and there's no evidence of any purposeful mishandling of info (IE: "I know you don't have clearance to see this, but here it is, don't tell anybody" or "Here's the information we talked about, leak it to the press"). It was a very stupid mistake and if she were running against a competent person I'd judge her more harshly on it, but if Trump gets elected I think the least of my worries will be "do you think he's handling emails correctly?"
