Groucho
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2009
- Messages
- 1,363
- Reaction score
- 933
- Location
- Pocono Mountains, PA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Those people are in jail taking items or life they feel they are entitled to.
Sounds like your guys to me.
Right. Conservatives never commit crimes.
Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
Show me where I said Conservatives never commit crimes.
Up to your own failed tricks I see
Show me where I said Conservatives never commit crimes.
Up to your own failed tricks I see
Besides, this "watchdog group" didn't bother to verify felons voting in conservative districts, they only went with the Minneapolis area because they knew it was more liberal. Bias much?
Tell me, why have Democrats pushed hard for felons to vote? Because they slant heavily left.
You should have quit while you had made a decent point. If you were on the witness stand in court and kept blabbing (the paragraph quoted above), your lawyer would be projectile vomiting about the place. you gotta know when to hold'em... know when to fold'em...
Deuce,... if you were doing research to illustrate voter fraud in a tight election, where would you go? To a law abiding conservative district filled with retirees and families, or to a district that's has more felons, higher criminality and leans Democrat?
They proved their point. I do wish they should examine all votes from all districts, and reveal the totality of the fraud perpetrated upon the state and nation.
.
perhaps once they have paid their debt to society their rights should be restored. odd concept, yes?
This page outlines a laundry list of complaints:
Election Integrity
Here's the 7 page felon study:
http://www.minnesotamajority.org/Portals/0/documents/ReportOnFelonVoters.pdf
If they're not, then why should we pay any attention to it? Doing a study to prove what you already believe is the opposite way of finding out the truth.
And if they are, why should we believe them?
When an independent voter group or an unbiased media source does a similar study, then I'd pay attention to it.
Tell me, why have Democrats pushed hard for felons to vote? Because they slant heavily left.
You should have quit while you had made a decent point. If you were on the witness stand in court and kept blabbing (the paragraph quoted above), your lawyer would be projectile vomiting about the place. you gotta know when to hold'em... know when to fold'em...
Deuce,... if you were doing research to illustrate voter fraud in a tight election, where would you go? To a law abiding conservative district filled with retirees and families, or to a district that's has more felons, higher criminality and leans Democrat?
They proved their point. I do wish they should examine all votes from all districts, and reveal the totality of the fraud perpetrated upon the state and nation.
.
No vote once you get out of prison.perhaps once they have paid their debt to society their rights should be restored. odd concept, yes?
You complained the folks narrowed their search, going to a know Lib district.Again with the straw man? Really?
Did anybody suggest anwhere that illegal voting shouldn't be investigated?
Blinded by bias much?Besides, this "watchdog group" didn't bother to verify felons voting in conservative districts, they only went with the Minneapolis area because they knew it was more liberal. Bias much?
No vote once you get out of prison.
Perhaps after a decade or more of living a life free of crime, and having had time to assimilate to society, and then not all felons. A second felony charge would disqualify said felon for life... the current status-quo.
You complained the folks narrowed their search, going to a know Lib district.
Have you forgotten? Let me refresh your memory... see your words below.
After briefly reviewing both links - it seems there's enough prima facie evidence to at least investigate. If the evidence is strong, it should be enough to open up a lawsuit.
Quoted for truth.I basically agree with this. It's hard to make this a partisan thing, when the group first brought the issue up prior to the election. Further, their motives are irrelevant if the charges are accurate. I don't see a lawsuit, but I do think an investigation into whether the number of voter irregularities is outside the norm(there always are some voter irregularities) and what can be done to reduce voter irregularities.
Franken is still going to be Senator, and should be. He won not because of any voter fraud or whatever, but because he had enough votes at the end of the recount process. I will say the same thing I said about Gore in 2000...he has no room to complain because if he wanted to win, he should have done enough work to win by a clear margin. Once it goes to recounts and courts, anything can happen, and you just have to accept the outcome.
After briefly reviewing both links - it seems there's enough prima facie evidence to at least investigate. If the evidence is strong, it should be enough to open up a lawsuit.
I basically agree with this. It's hard to make this a partisan thing, when the group first brought the issue up prior to the election. Further, their motives are irrelevant if the charges are accurate. I don't see a lawsuit, but I do think an investigation into whether the number of voter irregularities is outside the norm(there always are some voter irregularities) and what can be done to reduce voter irregularities.
Franken is still going to be Senator, and should be. He won not because of any voter fraud or whatever, but because he had enough votes at the end of the recount process. I will say the same thing I said about Gore in 2000...he has no room to complain because if he wanted to win, he should have done enough work to win by a clear margin. Once it goes to recounts and courts, anything can happen, and you just have to accept the outcome.
Of course, you can prove that felons and illegal immigrants vote more than 90% Democrat, can't you?
They did bring their laundry list of voter irregularities to the Minnesota Supreme Court--they lost. Jeff Davis « Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media.
Also, Minnesota Majority stated that the Prosecutors Office in both counties investigated and did bring charges against a handful of the names, but not that many although they admitted that it may be due to an inadequate resources in both offices or feet dragging. Somewhere (it may be on MM website), they had a list of names of people prosecuted.
So what's the moral of the story?
Cheat and play dirty - even illegally and get your guy elected. It took 18 months with only a few prosecutions of unknown people. Sounds like a political win at the cost of undermining our entire system. Yay for us.
Much as I dislike the Democratic senator, are you suggesting that he personally located sufficient number of felons and then persuaded them to go and vote for him?
Nope, that would be the party....Ever been to the streets of Baltimore on any given election day? The vans appear, and everything from breakfast, to a quick $20, what they call walkin money, can be had if you let them take you to the polls. wink, wink.....
j-mac
And that would be just the Democrats doing that, would it? Besides, is Baltimore in Minnesota these days?
And that would be just the Democrats doing that, would it? Besides, is Baltimore in Minnesota these days?
Note also that it never occurs to these guys that conservatives may have been the ones driving these theoretical Baltimore, MN vans.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?