- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 2,921
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Her account is not consistent with his and never will be, no matter how hard you stomp to the contrary.Inconsistent with who's account? Not the girlfriend's, which it is consistent with. So who's?
Please link to it.
Whether or not he has the most reason to lie is a different subject. Would you like to debate it?
force ≠ firearmI beg to differ, noob to this board that I am.
City Manager Offers Misleading Justification for Not Arresting Travyon Martin’s Shooter
BTW, the city manager only offered the police chief's explanation. He neither authored nor approved of the chief's response.
This is all about guns laws, actually.
What he said, and what you think he said has been two different things from the beginning.
So how about you break it down point by point with the actual audio and time references.
That way we can see for ourselves if what you have provided is true.
Otherwise you are just blowing more smoke.
Reason for edit.
Grammar.
I see you are still trying to spin what happened. I am defending the use of correct information which you do not seem to want to do.
Trayvon is dead because he decided to confront Zimmerman from behind.
Holy ****!! Tell me you didn't just say that?????
- "It appears Zimmerman shot Martin in the chest while Martin was kicking Zimmerman and possible trying to take the gun - and as Zimmerman yelled for someone to help him." ~ joko104
- "Martin, a champion football player who lifts weights, became enraged, rushed Zimmerman slugging him in the face, knocking Zimmerman to the ground. Martin then did a field goal kick to Zimmerman's head." ~ joko104
You're the one asserting facts unknown.
Are you offended at yourself?
...Trayvon is dead because he decided to confront Zimmerman from behind....
I already explained the distinction of what constitutes "facts' for the prosecution versus "facts' for the defense under Florida law. A "fact" for the defense is anything that might possibly have happened that evidence doesn't disprove.
We have two prior instances where Zimmerman put his hands on people, one of them a COP, one a domestic abuse case that led to a restraining order.
That's pretty much what I suspect happened. "They always get away" also lends credence to the idea he tried to physically restrain Martin.
And a big stranger that's been following me GRABBING me would freak me the **** out.
Pretty sure that actually grabbing somebody triggers self defense too, making Martin punching Zim perfectly legal.
The evidence doesn't point to more than a punch in the face followed by a fall backwards onto the sidewalk.
I wonder if LE even bothered to determine if Zim had any other injuries? Powder burns on Martin?
Its LEs willingness to accept simple statements that bothers me.
There should have been a wealth of forensic evidence. But even though the 911 operator stated Zim sounded intoxicated, no toxicology was performed on Zimmerman. Isn't carrying while under the influence illegal?
I've "put my hands (adversarially) on another man in a tense situation more times than I could possibly remember in response to provocative words or just to take control of a situation that seemed escalating to violence....
have you ever put your hands on a police officer and charged with battery?
ever had a restaining order put on you by an ex-girlfriend?
ever attack an ex-girlfriend?
have you ever put your hands on a police officer and charged with battery?
ever had a restaining order put on you by an ex-girlfriend?
ever attack an ex-girlfriend?
Doesn't that only apply to those in policy custody?My memory may be wrong and I don't care to dig down links again, but now that I think about it, I don't remember reading in the police report of the two officers who spoke to Zimmerman even stating in that report they gave him a Miranda Warning - and I just heard on TV they interviewed him for 2 hours - so not exactly "spontaneous."
If so, it is likely that whether or not anything Zimmerman told the police is admissible or not might depend singularly on whether the Defense wants the jury to hear it.
I really think the real story that is being learned is that the police saw BOTH Zimmerman and Martin as poor, irrelevant people so didn't really give a damn much either way.
I have not changed what I said at all.Now you're changing what you said. Earlier, you said he stopped following Trayvon when the 911 dispatcher told him, "you don't have to do [follow him] that." Now you're saying he didn't break off his pursuit because of that.
<sarcasm>You're as consistant as Zimmerman's account</sarcasm>
Your assertion is false.Absolutely FALSE. Martin is dead because a predator killed him to bolster his wannabe ego.
If you have read this topic, they are all available within.Where do you come up with your information? Can i get some of the sources you get your "facts" from.
Yes. His statement is consistent with hers. No mater how much you want to deny it, it still is.Her account is not consistent with his and never will be, no matter how hard you stomp to the contrary.
Zimmerman claims he got out of his SUV to see a street sign and was attacked from behind as he headed back to his car. The confrontation occurred nowhere near the street and according to the witness, began with the two talking to each other, not one attacking the other from behind.
Read it for yourself ...
Zimmerman said he had stepped out of his truck to check the name of the street he was on when Trayvon attacked him from behind as he walked back to his truck, police said. He said he feared for his life and fired the semiautomatic handgun he was licensed to carry because he feared for his life.
Grand jury to probe Trayvon Martin killing - Trayvon Martin - MiamiHerald.com
Lee, the police chief, said in a statement that the police dispatcher's "suggestion" to Zimmerman that he did not need to follow Martin "is not a lawful order that Mr. Zimmermann would be required to follow."
"Mr. Zimmerman's statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon," Lee said.
'Stand Your Ground Law' at center of Fla. shooting - Yahoo! News
Seriously?How the **** do you get from ....
... when Zimmerman said he was attacked from behind, not confronted from behind?
You're the one spinning yourself in circles.
And just so ya know ... asking someone why they're following you is not an attack.
Martin's confronting him with a question and his replying and then a scuffle ensuing could have came from behind and happened quickly enough to be interpreted and relayed as an attack from behind.
force ≠ firearm
The use of firearms may be the use of force, but not all use of force is a firearm.
This is about self defense. Self defense is a subject that is linked to guns, but it's not the same thing.
imho
I am aware of that. Which has nothing to do with the correct wording of what was actually said or any authority or lack of, that went along with it.
Yes I have, and most recently I said the following.
I can't believe I have to resort to the following so we are all on the same wavelength.
Zimmerman found that Trayvon was "... just walking around looking at all the houses.".
For someone working in the capacity of NW, this observation is suspicious behavior.
This was suspicious enough to Zimmerman to call in. And was enough for the police to respond.
Then Trayvon compounded the initial suspicion with more suspicious actions.
After being observed, and according to his girlfriend's statement he placed his hood on.
Why does someone do that? To hide their face?
To me that is additional suspicious behavior.
And then running away. More suspicious behavior.
For someone working in the capacity of NW, these observation are suspicious.
Now if I wasn't acting in the capacity of NW I probably wouldn't think much of these actions or of the possibility that someone may be casing the neighborhood.
But Zimmerman thought his actions suspicious and call them in, and the police dispatched a car.
That is what maters here.
Doesn't that only apply to those in policy custody?
Your assertion is false.
In stead of letting Zimmerman return to his truck Trayvon decided to confront him.
Trayvon is dead because he decided to confront Zimmerman from behind.
My memory may be wrong and I don't care to dig down links again, but now that I think about it, I don't remember reading in the police report of the two officers who spoke to Zimmerman even stating in that report they gave him a Miranda Warning - and I just heard on TV they interviewed him for 2 hours - so not exactly "spontaneous."
If so, it is likely that whether or not anything Zimmerman told the police is admissible or not might depend singularly on whether the Defense wants the jury to hear it.
I really think the real story that is being learned is that the police saw BOTH Zimmerman and Martin as poor, irrelevant people so didn't really give a damn much either way.
Your assertion is false.
In stead of letting Zimmerman return to his truck Trayvon decided to confront him.
Trayvon is dead because he decided to confront Zimmerman from behind.
...There are legitimate restraining orders certainly. But judges tend to hand those out like candy to women in divorce cases and it is a common tactic of women's attorneys in divorces. Those aren't criminal charges, there is no jury trial, and accordingly they are neither criminal convictions nor admissible in any criminal case.
Sorry but we don't know that as fact, unless you were PERSONALLY there to witness it.
All we know is Zimmerman got out, something happened, and Trayvon was shot by Zimmerman.
The horrifying thing is many in the public have already pronounced Zimmerman guilty and probably with a death sentence which is why he had to move out of his house.
I'm not saying Zimmerman isn't guilty, but that is for our legal system to decide.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?