- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 91,845
- Reaction score
- 41,717
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Family of Florida teen killed by neighborhood watch volunteer feel 'betrayed' by
Lets go to one very basic example. We have a police officer on tape asking the guy if he is following him and informing him they do not need him to do that. YOU then parse that to mean that A-we dont REALLY know he was talking to a police officer and B-he wasnt REALLY telling him to not follow him. Your zeal in this instance alone completely blows any credibility which you might HOPE to have which...lets be honest...based on the facts...doesnt give you ANYTHING resembling sound footing from the get-go. I would kinda LOVE for you to be the guys defense attorney though. Whereas I believe he should be tried for some level of manslaughter because he CAUSED the incident and death, your defense would get the guy fried for sure.
Just curious...with the number of times you continue to say the same things over and over again have you actully CONVINCED yourself that your arguments ARENT stupid?Wonderful!
If I am, then it should be no problem for you to point out these falsities, spin and mischaracterizing of mine, just like I did for yours.
Until then all we have is your spin, multiple falsities and mischaracterizing.
You even started your spin and mischaracterizing again in this post.
Your narrative is as clear as mud.
Because you rely on a biased outlook of what occurred.
It is filled with hyperbole, supposition and outright falsities.
And is just plain wrong.
Wrong again.
There was no stalking or harassment.
Wrong again.
No law says this.
Wrong again.
It was not illegal, so therefore he had every (r)ight.
This statement has been corrected over and over again, so I can only assume you are choosing to lie.
He was not told to do anything. A suggestion was made.
No one knows if it was actually an Officer and it doesn't matter if it was, because an Officer on the phone has no on site Authority over the person on the other end. None.
And as I believe was pointed out earlier, the 911 operator has no Authority because it would be a liability issue.
Wrong again.
Wrong again.
No law says this.
The suspicious behavior did exist.
Whether or not you or I think it was or wasn't suspicious doesn't matter.
Because it depends on the perceptions of the one who calls it in.
And as evidenced from the call, it was enough to dispatch a unit.
Wrong again.
That isn't a great track record.
Lets go to one very basic example. We have a police officer on tape asking the guy if he is following him and informing him they do not need him to do that. YOU then parse that to mean that A-we dont REALLY know he was talking to a police officer and B-he wasnt REALLY telling him to not follow him. Your zeal in this instance alone completely blows any credibility which you might HOPE to have which...lets be honest...based on the facts...doesnt give you ANYTHING resembling sound footing from the get-go. I would kinda LOVE for you to be the guys defense attorney though. Whereas I believe he should be tried for some level of manslaughter because he CAUSED the incident and death, your defense would get the guy fried for sure.