- Jul 19, 2005
- Reaction score
- Political Leaning
You're mistaken. You've chosen to dismiss the contexts, but that doesn't mean they don't exist nor does it mean I haven't posted them.You've presented no evidence there is such a context therefore, there's nothing else to consider until such time as that occurs.
For the record I'm a member of the Republican Party.You claimed to be a conservative... what "party" are you referring to?
I disagree. In fact I've called for accountability for Etheridge many times. People keep making this assertion against me, and it's a false claim. I've responded to it every single time with the same line, "Find even one post in this thread that in any way what-so-ever defends Etheridge." You won't. In fact, I've called for him to be held accountable. I think he should be prosecuted. This is not an acceptable response from a member of our government.And let me point out that's exactly the problem and why you've gotten such hard push back ... you're for "party" instead of for "equal justice under the law".
Once again, you've made the same accusation against me more than once, and I have answered it more than once. I won't stop answering it no matter how often it's repeated. Each time I answer it it lends crediblity to me, and undermines your own. The attempt to misportray me only works if I stop responding, and I assure you that this is not going to happen.
You can either stop trying to levy false accusations against me, or I'll repeatedly challenge you to do what I've now challenged several of you to do several times; find any one shred of excuse I've offered for Etheridge. Find any one statement by me made on this web site or any other that defends him. You won't. You'll find quite the opposite in fact.
I'm not going to stop responding to these false accusations, and each time I do it shows my credibility and I get a chance to remind people that you're making things up about me.
Feel free to continue to pursue this course of action. It will not result in any different outcomes than it already has.
On the topic of accountability, I'm also interested in who sent the trackers. I think any intelligent person would be.
I haven't demonized them. I've said that they certainly do appear to be political trackers. Nothing more. I've never discounted that they could be telling the truth. I've simply pointed out that the claims that they were "just students" working "on a project" does not make sense as it has been presented here. The story doesn't jive. That's reality.Frankly, I find it ironic as hell that you're claiming integrity when your fictional demonization of these kids
I didn't call them baby-eaters. I didn't call them thugs. I've said the story explaining them doesn't make sense, and that the longer that remains the case the more solid I think the case becomes that they were indeed political activists rather than students just working on a project.
But again, making false statements about me doesn't really harm me, and I will continue to address them each time they come up. My character has remained consistent. My integrity is present. I'm not afraid of going over this again and again. I'm not the one making things up to try to silence someone else's points.
I see no reason other than cowardice to not acknowledge that the story being portrayed about who the two cameramen really were does not jive. I see no reason other than the fear of finding out an answer we don't like for not asking where they came from and how this situation came to pass.
I think anyone not asking those questions, already thinks they know the answer, and just doesn't want anyone to confirm it.