Quite an accomplishment indeed - the president of the united states aligning himself with radical Islam. Who'da thunk?If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.
Quite an alliance! Was it not the Three Musketeers who shouted “All for one and one for all” each time they sought combat? This really should be the new battle cry if – or when – the statesmen of the Western world go to war against Bashar al-Assad.
The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama, Cameron, Hollande and the rest of the miniature warlords.
This, of course, will not be trumpeted by the Pentagon or the White House – nor, I suppose, by al-Qa’ida – though they are both trying to destroy Bashar. So are the Nusra front, one of al-Qa’ida’s affiliates. But it does raise some interesting possibilities.
Robert Fisk: We
We can fight both at the same time.
Glad that discussion is over with.
So just kill everyone in Syria?
To join in on a war, we have to pick a side. By attacking Assad we're helping Al-Qaeda. It's a lose-lose whatever we do, which is why we should listen to the 90+% of Americans who say "**** no we shouldn't attack Syria" and mind our own business for what seems like the first time ever.
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.
Quite an alliance! Was it not the Three Musketeers who shouted “All for one and one for all” each time they sought combat? This really should be the new battle cry if – or when – the statesmen of the Western world go to war against Bashar al-Assad.
The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama, Cameron, Hollande and the rest of the miniature warlords.
This, of course, will not be trumpeted by the Pentagon or the White House – nor, I suppose, by al-Qa’ida – though they are both trying to destroy Bashar. So are the Nusra front, one of al-Qa’ida’s affiliates. But it does raise some interesting possibilities.
Robert Fisk: We
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida......
Mornin Medusa. :2wave: Well truthfully its not the First time and yes our Pols know.
We can fight both at the same time.
Glad that discussion is over with.
Technically that might be true. We did support Bin Laden in Afghanistan, however. We sent him and his men weapons. He was doing to the Russians there, what he did against us later.
good afternoon MMC
l worry that it will cause a greater conflict around
imperialism seems like satanism to me
no no worse than it
More than likely it will.....one thing is for certain. It's not going to stop the sectarian killing.
Mornin Medusa. :2wave: Well truthfully its not the First time and yes our Pols know.
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.
Quite an alliance! Was it not the Three Musketeers who shouted “All for one and one for all” each time they sought combat? This really should be the new battle cry if – or when – the statesmen of the Western world go to war against Bashar al-Assad.
The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama, Cameron, Hollande and the rest of the miniature warlords.
This, of course, will not be trumpeted by the Pentagon or the White House – nor, I suppose, by al-Qa’ida – though they are both trying to destroy Bashar. So are the Nusra front, one of al-Qa’ida’s affiliates. But it does raise some interesting possibilities.
Robert Fisk: We
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." BHO
And this is surprising how? Sunni, Shia or somewhere in between?
they are not muslims.muslims dont kill any other muslim.they dont even kill any other people of other faiths .
tahts why these miserable radicals may ally with modern crusaders in any war.
indian islamists had prevented the people from struggling against the UK imperialism because colonialists had let them practice their beliefs and pray in mosques
what an ignorance,what a judass kiss
If Al Qaida supports breathing, will you start holding your breath?
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." BHO
And this is surprising how? Sunni, Shia or somewhere in between?
Al Qaeda is not the only group fighting against Assad.
If Al Qaida supports breathing, will you start holding your breath?
hi redress
l know radical islamism is really more dangerous than it seems
If AQ supports Chickin Huntin.....will you bare your neck.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?