• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

At least 8 white nationalists are running for federal office (video)

TurtleDude said:
what a stupid question-we'd have problems with the party actually supporting their message. Last I checked, you can claim to be republican when you choose to run/
Click to expand...

Oh look, you actually focused on the 8 candidates!

Now, be a hero and disprove that they are white nationalists, show your work.
 
ecofarm said:
Being hysterically against the SPLC makes one look like a raging racist.

Fact.

Deal with it.
Click to expand...

Or someone that simply paid attention to their actions as of late. They are no longer the same group they once were, now they are merely a Left wing activist group. Pretty much any right wing think tank is a hate group to them. Hell they even labeled a Muslim man an anti-Muslim extremist.

Here is a decent article about them:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...splc-trump-southern-poverty-law-center-215312
 
beefheart said:
Oh look, you actually focused on the 8 candidates!

Now, be a hero and disprove that they are white nationalists, show your work.
Click to expand...

still lying I see-where did I ever deny they are white nationalists, or racists or supremacists? what I take issue with is the purpose of this thread-to smear the GOP by insinuating the GOP supports racist candidates because extremists choose to claim they are GOP members to get on a ballot in an area they could not if they claimed to be Dems
 
DiAnna said:
Your link is an opinion piece; pure commentary. Which is fine, but it's not investigative journalism or actual news.
Click to expand...

It's informational, which can lead to others doing their own digging.
 
Nap said:
Pretty much any right wing think tank is a hate group to them.
Click to expand...

Which hate group on their list would you like to apologize for specifically?
 
TurtleDude said:
still lying I see-where did I ever deny they are white nationalists, or racists or supremacists? what I take issue with is the purpose of this thread-to smear the GOP by insinuating the GOP supports racist candidates because extremists choose to claim they are GOP members to get on a ballot in an area they could not if they claimed to be Dems
Click to expand...

I am not lying. You are pissed off and triggered when someone mentions SPLC.

Yet.....you won't actually address the topic. So damned hilarious of you.

Your only purpose in this thread is for you to bray about how you don't like the SPLC, we get it....start a new thread then. Otherwise, its the same old baloney.
 
Renae said:
It's informational, which can lead to others doing their own digging.
Click to expand...

And, its your thread, and you won't do any actual digging to refute the claims.
 
beefheart said:
I am not lying. You are pissed off and triggered when someone mentions SPLC.

Yet.....you won't actually address the topic. So damned hilarious of you.

Your only purpose in this thread is for you to bray about how you don't like the SPLC, we get it....start a new thread then. Otherwise, its the same old baloney.
Click to expand...

see this is one of your silly tactics-you accuse others of being angry, triggered and pissed off when your attempt to divert is signs of all three of those. you engage in a condescending arrogance in an effort to suppress arguments you don't like and its patently obvious to many of us. and yes you are lying
 
TurtleDude said:
what a dishonest question.
Click to expand...

Well, if he just wants to apologize for everyone on the list with a blanket statement, he can leave it at that. But it would probably be more effective if he could apologize for at least one specific group. You know, to add some reality to his apologism.
 
TurtleDude said:
see this is one of your silly tactics-you accuse others of being angry, triggered and pissed off when your attempt to divert is signs of all three of those. you engage in a condescending arrogance in an effort to suppress arguments you don't like and its patently obvious to many of us. and yes you are lying
Click to expand...

Just stating the facts. All you have done here is attack the source, without doing any due diligence on the actual topic. Very sloppy way to debate. You are the one being deliberately obtuse (yeah, I know big words too). Come on, be a hero, prove to everyone that the group you hate is wrong!


BTW, you cornered the market on silly tactics, so don't even try to use that as an argument.
 
Bassman said:
Besides the fact the SPLC is themselves a terrorist group with zero credibility?
Click to expand...

Wow, really?

Please enlighten us on all the terrorism they have done.
 
ecofarm said:
Well, if he just wants to apologize for everyone on the list with a blanket statement, he can leave it at that. But it would probably be more effective if he could apologize for at least one specific group. You know, to add some reality to his apologism.
Click to expand...

what? why should he apologize. he hasn't done anything wrong
 
beefheart said:
Just stating the facts. All you have done here is attack the source, without doing any due diligence on the actual topic. Very sloppy way to debate. You are the one being deliberately obtuse (yeah, I know big words too). Come on, be a hero, prove to everyone that the group you hate is wrong!


BTW, you cornered the market on silly tactics, so don't even try to use that as an argument.
Click to expand...

BTW your dishonesty is obvious-you couldn't even answer the basic question. don't use terms like due diligence when you clearly have no clue about the meaning
 
beefheart said:
I am not lying. You are pissed off and triggered when someone mentions SPLC.

Yet.....you won't actually address the topic. So damned hilarious of you.

Your only purpose in this thread is for you to bray about how you don't like the SPLC, we get it....start a new thread then. Otherwise, its the same old baloney.
Click to expand...

And your purpose on this thread? Looks to me you proved TurtleDude's point.
beefheart said:
LOL, of course not.

So many people here just use subtle and overt racism to back their arguments.
Click to expand...
 
Bassman said:
Besides the fact the SPLC is themselves a terrorist group with zero credibility?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't call them a terrorist group. They are more like Jesse Jackson's scam-more extortionist in its make up.
 
TurtleDude said:
well to a liberal the SLPC would be slight left and the NR "far right"

to those more in the center or conservative, the SPLC is far left and the NR is mainstream right
Click to expand...

That's simply not true. Your perspective is warped in the opposite way you described. I checked with Media Bias, not some liberal. For comparison, see how they rate CNN, Breitbart, and MSNBC.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/
 
TurtleDude said:
BTW your dishonesty is obvious-you couldn't even answer the basic question. don't use terms like due diligence when you clearly have no clue about the meaning
Click to expand...

You are being dishonest, you spam this thread up with your "hate" for SPLC, but, typically, you won't even try to dispute the actual topic of the thread. Typical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom