- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
^ Type in my name and Benghazi, for just a small sample of my posts on the subject.
I'm not about to go through this again/
I will help you two crumbs though: http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...heories-and-accusations-6.html#post1064015421
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...heories-and-accusations-6.html#post1064015448
:naughty
About that House Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi, Part III …
All of the above analysis is based on a straightforward acceptance of the HIC report, though. Stephen Hayes takes a much closer and critical look at the document for The Weekly Standard, and finds huge holes in the work — and blames it on the outgoing chair of the committee, Mike Rogers:
The revelations even roused the establishment media from their Benghazi torpor and generated extraordinarily hostile questioning of White House press secretary Jay Carney by reporters who had trusted his claims of administration noninvolvement. None of this convinced Rogers to make Benghazi a priority—a fact that frustrated many of the committee’s members. Boehner received a steady stream of visits and phone calls from House members who complained that Rogers wasn’t doing his job. In all, seven members of the intelligence committee took their concerns directly to the speaker or his top aides......snip~
About that House Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi, Part III … « Hot Air
http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-po...gence-committee-report-benghazi-part-iii.html