- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,990
- Reaction score
- 60,556
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
But when asked about issues from her book and her campaign Wednesday, O'Donnell walked away from the interview, upset that Morgan wasn't not talking about the things she wished to address.
"Don't you think as a host, if I say this is what I want to talk about, that's what we should address?" she asked Morgan.
When Morgan said "no," O'Donnell began to take off her microphone and said she had turned down another interview for this appearance.
When you go on a talk show, you should expect that, that person will ask contraversial things about you.
Clearly O'Donnel is not self aware, she has said and done contraversial things.
O'Donnel cannot expect not to be asked about these things.
Only speaking about what the guest wants to talk about is the standard hosts have set. It's their fault. But no, that is not how it should be.
If these hosts want to continue having these guests, they are going to have to continue to deal with the limitations imposed on them by the guests and their publicists, managers, etc.... If the host feels they can do their show without guests, great. If not, they will always be forced to cut these types of deals because if they don't, someone else will.
Who matters more, the people or the guest ?If these hosts want to continue having these guests, they are going to have to continue to deal with the limitations imposed on them by the guests and their publicists, managers, etc.... If the host feels they can do their show without guests, great. If not, they will always be forced to cut these types of deals because if they don't, someone else will.
That's not necessarily true. I remember Oprah said in an interview that she never accepted limitations for interviews on her show. When people would request that she not mention certain things, she told them "no, I'll ask what I want or we don't have to do the interview" and she got plenty of guests.If these hosts want to continue having these guests, they are going to have to continue to deal with the limitations imposed on them by the guests and their publicists, managers, etc.... If the host feels they can do their show without guests, great. If not, they will always be forced to cut these types of deals because if they don't, someone else will.
That's not necessarily true. I remember Oprah said in an interview that she never accepted limitations for interviews on her show. When people would request that she not mention certain things, she told them "no, I'll ask what I want or we don't have to do the interview" and she got plenty of guests.
What I can remember seeing it was generally celebrities and pop culture people more than Politicians.
She is an idiot for thinking she could control the topic. It is the host/interviewer's show not the person being interviewed. Republicans usually say that CNN stands for Communist News Network or Clinton News network and she went on there anyways, so that makes her a even bigger idiot for going onto the show and thinking liberals would not ask her questions that themselves think are controversial. If she wanted to control the questions being asked then she should have the network or who ever signed a contract that only specific questions would be asked. Morgan is the one in the right seeing how it is his show and or that he is the interviewer. If O'donnell didn't want to have views that upset libs then she should have been a lib.O’Donnell walks out of CNN interview – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Basically, Piers Morgan was asking her about her stance,. those questions, was O'Donnal right to think she should be able to control the topic?
He is "wrong" for giving this circus clown the time of day.
She had Obama, George W. Bush, Palin, Gore, Clinton, John Edwards, Joe Biden, Arnold Swartezewhatever and probably others.I'm not an Oprah viewer, so I have to ask..... Exactly how many Politicians did she regularly have on that show? What I can remember seeing it was generally celebrities and pop culture people more than Politicians. Assuming she didn't have a lot of politicians, I would suggest her unwillingness to limit topics of conversation would be a main reason why.
She is an idiot for thinking she could control the topic. It is the host/interviewer's show not the person being interviewed. Republicans usually say that CNN stands for Communist News Network or Clinton News network and she went on there anyways, so that makes her a even bigger idiot for going onto the show and thinking liberals would not ask her questions that themselves think are controversial. If she wanted to control the questions being asked then she should have the network or who ever signed a contract that only specific questions would be asked. Morgan is the one in the right seeing how it is his show and or that he is the interviewer. If O'donnell didn't want to have views that upset libs then she should have been a lib.
No they don't. These guests need the air time every bit as much as the hosts needs guests. If no host would give a political candidate air time unless they were willing to answer the questions the hosts want addressed they would.
That's not necessarily true. I remember Oprah said in an interview that she never accepted limitations for interviews on her show. When people would request that she not mention certain things, she told them "no, I'll ask what I want or we don't have to do the interview" and she got plenty of guests.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?