Aryan Imperium
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2005
- Messages
- 929
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
kal-el said:I think it was the Romans, who were directly responsible, but the Jewish establishment had a hand in it as well.
teenonfire4him77 said:Jesus did exsist, in many records of historians, and even in Roman records of crucifiction have recorded that they crucifed a man named Jesus.
Also, it is most definatly the Romans who had killed Jesus, the jewish leadership had influence on the decision however.
Think of it like this, in America, you have your state laws...but you also have to follow the federal laws. It was the same way, the Romans let the jews govern themselves for the most part, but they couldn't kill anybody...so they had to go to the Romans to have permission to kill somebody.
Originally posted by teenonfireforhim77
Jesus did exsist, in many records of historians, and even in Roman records of crucifiction have recorded that they crucifed a man named Jesus.
If you had read the post i responded too...you would see that I said that in reference to his exsistence, not his divinity.kal-el said:You are indeed correct, records do exist that the Romans crucified a chap named Jesus. But that does not prove in any way, shape or form, that he was "divine."
teenonfire4him77 said:If you had read the post i responded too...you would see that I said that in reference to his exsistence, not his divinity.
No he didn`t:read the site.
If AFTER READING THE SITE you still maintain that he existed then prove it!
Start by stating the sources. It is simply just not good enough to state "in many records of historians".
Do you also maintain that this fictional character is also the "son of god"?
SKILMATIC said:You will beleive anything hitler says wont you? So I suppose you are also racist too? Cause the color of your skin has a direct correlation with everything doesnt it?
O man Skilly, you're getting closer to the creationalism vs. evolution thread. Are you ready to post your "factual" evidence yet? We're waiting.
SKILMATIC said:Again I have already answered your question on this. If you cant read then thats not my problem. Go back and read the whole thread over.
two history textbooks, one used in high schools and one used in colleges.teenonfire4him77 said:No he didn`t:read the site.
If AFTER READING THE SITE you still maintain that he existed then prove it!
Start by stating the sources. It is simply just not good enough to state "in many records of historians".
Do you also maintain that this fictional character is also the "son of god"?
hows about we return to the original topic instead of starting a scientific debate, this is about history, not science. history still holds that Jesus existed, so the question is, who killed Him?SKILMATIC said:Again I have already answered your question on this. If you cant read then thats not my problem. Go back and read the whole thread over.
Jeremiah1:5 said:The Romans and the Jews may have directly killed Jesus, but it's actually our fault. He died for our sins.
kal-el said:You are indeed correct, records do exist that the Romans crucified a chap named Jesus. But that does not prove in any way, shape or form, that he was "divine."
SKILMATIC said:You will beleive anything hitler says wont you? So I suppose you are also racist too? Cause the color of your skin has a direct correlation with everything doesnt it?
Jeremiah1:5 said:The Romans and the Jews may have directly killed Jesus, but it's actually our fault. He died for our sins.
Aryan Imperium said:What "records"? State your sources please!
kal-el said:Aryan, I think it is well-known that the Romans did indeed crucify a man by the name of Jesus. If you wanna find out so bad, I would suggest doing a simple google search on it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?