- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 25,893
- Reaction score
- 12,484
- Location
- New York, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Congress refers to both the house and the senate....
The Republicans took the Senate in 1980 and it was the Republican Senate that wrote the first tax cut bill (Kemp-Roth Act) in 1981 and rescinded it in 1982 to raise the payroll taxes. It was in the first link I showed you.
Here's a link to the election of 1980....
United States Senate elections, 1980 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop calling me a liar and do your own damn homework. All I can do is you show the facts, but I can't make you think. You have to do that yourself....
Yes, I am aware that there are two houses of Congress. In order for a bill to become a law, it has to be enacted word for word by both houses. If the Democrats controlled the House by 70 seats, you cannot say that a "Republican Congress" passed the bill. That is a lie.
Moreover, even if you could say that, you're still linking to a tax hike as evidence for the argument that said "Republican Congress" caused a huge deficit.
Exactly."I dont know, I heard somewhere obama has received more death threats than any other president. Probably little things like that make them say those things." - SE102
And these were all conservatives / traditionalists and not just nut-jobs?
I keep seeing comments in the media, on this board and elsewhere throwing around the label “right-wing extremist”. While I understand the need for some to marginalize a viewpoint instead of debating it, I am left wondering what people must think a “right-wing extremist” is.
I consider myself to be a “traditionalist” and am:
1. Pro-life,
2. Pro 2nd Amendment,
3. for a small government,
4. for a reduction in taxes,
5. for traditional marriage (but support a change in laws for equitable tax rates, etc.),
6. opposed to government interference in health care,
7. for minimal government regulation of business,
8. strict enforcement of immigration laws (including border protection),
9. for Gitmo,
10. opposed to granting terrorist the same Constitutional rights as legitimate Americans,
11. Pro death penalty,
12. for strict interpretation of the Constitution.
This is just a quick-list off the top of my head but hopefully you’ll get the idea.
Is this what you consider a “right-wing” extremist”?
This is a funny contradiction the right has. You are for pro life but are for Pro death penalty...Really????
The difference is one is an innocent life, the other guilty of a heinous crime.
The difference is one is an innocent life, the other guilty of a heinous crime.
This is a funny contradiction the right has. You are for pro life but are for Pro death penalty...Really????
Also, you cry about Government messing with your rights yet you want government to tell you what to do with your body?????? I don't get it ????
Number 12 is another one. The right say they value the constitution yet many of want to change it to fit your purpose?????
That's pretty extreme to compare a multicellular diploid eukaryote to a living breathing child.Do you really fail to see the difference between killing an innocent child and killing a guilty man?
When you're pregnant, you have another body inside of you. You can do whatever you want to YOUR body, but you shouldn't harm someone else's body.
Our Founders were smart enough to allow amendments to the Constitution.
I find your ????????????????s to be very annoying.
That's pretty extreme to compare a multicellular diploid eukaryote to a living breathing child.
Do you really fail to see the difference between killing an innocent child and killing a guilty man?
I finally found the perfect answer to the OP.
What is a right-wing extremist?
what is funny is that the GOP of today is really not any different than the Reagan era but the libs today are far far more leftwing than the days of Jim Wright or even Bill Clinton. I hear this crap that the GOP is far more rightwing yet on what issues compared to Reagan?
Really.
So the GOP of today would be okay with another earned income tax credit? Oh wait. protested the earned income tax credit under Obama.
So the GOP of today would be for emissions trading, pinoneered under Reagan which is cap and trade? Oh wait. They are calling Cap and Trade "evil."
So the GOP of today would be for Obama's weapons control as Reagan pushed hard for? Oh wait. They called his entire idea on that "awful."
So the GOP of today would be for raising taxes to save Social Security as Reagan did? Oh wait. Their dirty open secret is to privatize it.
I'll give you one thing the GOP of today is similar to of the GOP of Reagan. Military force as applied Jominian theory.
photoshop is a right wing extremist? that actually explains a lot.
photoshop is a right wing extremist? that actually explains a lot.
To me a right wing extremist is someone who is conservative in nature who threatens or performs a terrorist or violent act in order to instill fear and achieve conservative/supremacist/segregationist/nativist/extreme religious political gains.
photoshop is a right wing extremist? that actually explains a lot.
Really.
So the GOP of today would be okay with another earned income tax credit? Oh wait. protested the earned income tax credit under Obama.
So the GOP of today would be for emissions trading, pinoneered under Reagan which is cap and trade? Oh wait. They are calling Cap and Trade "evil."
So the GOP of today would be for Obama's weapons control as Reagan pushed hard for? Oh wait. They called his entire idea on that "awful."
So the GOP of today would be for raising taxes to save Social Security as Reagan did? Oh wait. Their dirty open secret is to privatize it.
I'll give you one thing the GOP of today is similar to of the GOP of Reagan. Military force as applied Jominian theory.
There isn't a straight and horizontal spectrum. It is more or less a circle where the right and left meets at a certain point.
Now with that said, "extremism" is not necessarily on any spectrum. Extremism is modus operandi for certain points on the spectrum. It dictates the measures to which one would go to see their perspective through. A tea-party protester in Denver, CO. holding a sign that says "hand off my money, bitch" that depicts Obama signaling "fork over the money" is not extremism. A tea-party protester who has booby-trapped his drive way to make sure that whenever the tax collector comes by he blows them to smithereens is an extremist.
Call the tea-party out for it's hypocritical rhetoric and it's silly ancestor worship, but because it holds what I may consider as silly or dead wrong viewpoints does not mean that sign-wielding tea party member is an extremist-- you know.. until he booby-traps his drive way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?