- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,343
- Reaction score
- 82,725
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No matter what happens in Ukraine, the defensive architecture of Europe has changed and will continue to change.
Exactly. If you don't think he has designs on Finland, you're grossly mistaken. Finland, like Ukraine, represents a successful country on its border. Finland was never part of the Warsaw pact, but did have a treaty with the USSR from 1948 to 1992. The Baltic states will be his first NATO targets.Moldova and Georgia are prime targets. I don't think Putin would attack Finland.
None of these are NATO nations.
Have you not been watching Ukraine? Chechnya? Syria? That's Putin's methodology. He targets civilians. He destroys cities. The point is terror. Ukraine is just the biggest target so far. It will not be the last, so long as Putin is in power. The biggest problem is, we have no idea who would succeed Putin. It could get worse.World war 2 had the stakes of industrial genocide and total war. This aint it.
I completely agree.No matter what happens in Ukraine, the defensive architecture of Europe has changed and will continue to change.
In general, I agree with your entire program, although I would quibble about threatening nuclear conflagration or putting a bounty on heads of state. I think bounties for the surrender of Russian naval/military equipment (a la Red October), however, would be effective. $10,000 per tank/artillery piece, $50,000-100,000 per plane, millions per ship. (It would probably have to be tied to some kind of immigration status.)If the Russian Federation and Belarus surrenders or changes its government for a more positive one which will respect Ukrainian sovreignity and negotiate peacefully while turning over leaders and politicians who brought about the war, then begin ending the sanctions incrementally to reward cooperation with what follows the war. Appoint some mutually trusted countries and organisations to mediate bilateral talks between the Russian Federation and Ukraine involving territorial swaps and money compensations to allow new frontiers to reflect a compromise which both sides can live with. If the Russian Federation agrees to talk in good faith with Ukraine, comes to a settlement and agrees to reduce nuclear inventories to far lower levels along with the USA (50% or more reductions) and if the Russians agree to substantial and verifiable nuclear and missile reductions then negotiate removing the ABM missile bases in Eastern Europe. If all these preconditions are met, then extend that Marshal Plan to any parts of the Russian Federation and Belarus which were destroyed during the fighting to retake Ukraine. Have Europe, America, China and NATO countries pay for this Marshall Plan as well as Belarus and the Russian Federation through war reparations. Also negotiate a mutual drawing-down of conventional armed forces between Russia and the USA forces in Europe, if possible.
That's my plan. Pick it to pieces now, but only if you can offer better suggestions.
Cheers, be well and "F*** War!".
Evilroddy.
Why would he" engineer a nuclear disaster " on the country with 1200 mile land border with his own nation?
Rogue Valley:And while we are talking about security alliances, Belerus has allowed itself to be a part of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Belarus is member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) - Russia, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
I wonder why Antony Blinken never mentions this?
It appears I'm not alone. The Impossible Suddenly Became Possible (Ann Applebaum, Atlantic). "When Russia invaded Ukraine, the West’s assumptions about the world became unsustainable."
The above is a supposition on your part that I strongly disagree with.
The onlly way NATO will get involved in warfare is if Putin attacks a NATO member.
I completely agree.
I don't like this. I abhor this. I want less military spending, fewer weapons of mass destruction. This is not a world I want to live in. Unfortunately, it is the world we are in.
I do see a possible best-case scenario, and that is the collapse of Putin's government. That might give those other opportunists pause. I can see a wave of democratic sentiment in Russia, and Maidan moments in Hungary and Turkey. I can see a resurgence of democracy. I would welcome it.
I am always amazed at how so thoroughly a point can be missed.
Yes, I was less articulate than I could have been (a lack of sleep), but the central point was not really about what particular "response" would be "appropriate", but acknowledgement of the reality we are already in.
When NATO gets involved in Ukraine, and it will, that is a major muscle movement - I'll acknowledge that up front. It will expand far beyond whatever we intend - just as it has already.
And it is broader than I even outlined. This is existential stuff, people. We're not just talking about Europe, or Ukraine. We're reliving WWII, almost explicitly. I've written about this before. And we're making the same mistakes.
In the 1930s, we watched as Hitler reconstituted the German war machine, and did nothing. We knew his ambitions, he repeated it incessantly, but we ignored it. When he saber-rattled, we sought appeasement, somehow believing he'd be content with the Sudetenland. Instead, it emboldened him. He believed, correctly, that the West would not stop his further moves. We ignored Italy's practice war in Ethiopia, again believing it "didn't involve us" because, well, those were primitive people in a faraway land (read, Africans). Does this not sound incredibly familiar?
I'm not advocating for expansion. I'm not advocating saber-rattling. Yes, Putin has more ferocious weapons than Europe faced in WWII (or so it thought). But his playbook is the same. And, he is not alone. He has the same motivations, the same lack of a moral compass, and the same ruthlessness. I'm not sanguine about this, I'm terrified.
China will see the West's involvement in war with Russia as an opportunity. North Korea and Iran will see opportunity. They all have the same ambitions and the same structure - autocracy, and territorial expansion. This is the same fight and the same stakes that WWII was fought over. It is not just Ukraine. It is Taiwan. It is the entire Korean peninsula. It is Syria, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt. Again, does this not sound familiar?
What I am saying is, we need to prepare for that, and expect that, and realize this is going to get much, much, much worse, whether or not it ever gets better. We're just ignoring reality and that never ends well.
That's coming.
It needn't
The CSTO is a defensive arrangement. Neither Russia nor Belarus is under attack. None of the other members of CSTO have significant firepower, and certainly not offensive capabilities. Look here. They are included in the alliance to give Russia places to stage from.Rogue Valley:
Perhaps to give Azerbaijan, Armenia and the 'Stans' wiggle room to abrogate their treaty responsibilities to a Russian Federation and a Belarus which entered into a reckless war of choice? I am pretty sure that Central Asia is quite worried about the loose cannons shooting off invasions and nuclear threats in the west are doing.
Cheers and be well.
Evilroddy.
Ive seen it, really i have however if Putin were to go on a total war setting Ukraine would be desolate by now. Most wars involve destruction of cities when the target has major urban centers. We do not currently see the total war or industrial genocide which defined WW2, if Putin does not escalate much more than he has that would be to our benefit.Have you not been watching Ukraine? Chechnya? Syria? That's Putin's methodology. He targets civilians. He destroys cities. The point is terror. Ukraine is just the biggest target so far. It will not be the last, so long as Putin is in power. The biggest problem is, we have no idea who would succeed Putin. It could get worse.
All we need to do is capitulate to Putin. We all know, your tape is on a loop.It needn't
"You don't have to do this"
Quick, which one is Russia, Anton Chigurh or Carson?
We don't have to do this and we shouldn't do this. Dialogue now or potential extinction later ? Do we really need to dilly and dally on this?
All we need to do is capitulate to Putin. We all know, your tape is on a loop.
Why is averting disaster capitulating to Putin?
The Russians have watched NATO creep right up to its border and arm a country who it is at war with. Legitimate Russian national security concerns have not been taken seriously, what would you have done if the greatest military power in history had you in its sights and was on your doorstep ?