• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'We Don't Want You Here': Mexicans Protest Against Migrant Caravan

truthatallcost

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
26,719
Reaction score
6,278
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

Now here's my favorite part:


Are American liberals now going to demonize Mexicans as 'white supremacists' and 'racists' for not wanting the migrant caravan in their country???
 
Now here's my favorite part:



Are American liberals now going to demonize Mexicans as 'white supremacists' and 'racists' for not wanting the migrant caravan in their country???

American liberals will cherry pick the story and say it does not represent all Mexicans.
They would be right.
The other Mexicans helped them merely passing through their communities.
It is TJ where they have arrived to stay.
Stay and make an even bigger mess than it was before.

BUT...they can thank their own government for the mess.
 
'We Don't Want You Here': Mexicans Protest Against Migrant Caravan


Surely you don't think it's hard to find instances of folks wanting to have their cake and eat it too? Surely you aren't shocked that Mexicans do so every bit as much as Americans.

What's important to note is whether "we don't want you" is a state policy or a sentiment expressed by the public.


It makes sense that Mexicans/Mexico doesn't want a huge influx of low-skilled labor. It doesn't have enough low-skill jobs for the low-skill laborers it already has. That's a very different economic situation than we have in the US which has ample demand for low-skill labor but not enough people to fill those positions.

Economically:
  • Producers produce whatever it is they do and, to be profitable, they need to do so at a given COGS, a portion of which is labor cost. To be profitable they need to buy labor at $X/hr, and that wage rate translates into their demand for labor at $X/hr.
  • What products, thus firms and their profitability, are most sensitive to changes in wage rates? Products/sellers of goods that are elastically demanded. The more elastic the demand, the more sensitive the profits are to COGS increases. Why? Because as prices increase, buyers will purchase alternatives that either are absolutely lower in price and that provide enough utility, or that are comparably priced and provide more utility, or that are absolutely higher in price but also provide more utility. Who decides what utility any given good provides? The buyer.
 
I have just watched a video of those "migrants" acting loudly and rudely in the streets of TJ. Some were even carrying flags of their countries, countries that they claim have no jobs for them and countries that are full of violent crime.

More Americans would have some sympathy for them if they conducted themselves in a HUMBLE and RESPECTFUL manner. Just walk quietly. No yelling. No placards. No foreign flags.

When they reach the American border, show respect to the American authorities. Do not demand anything. Quietly and docilely explain that they are requesting asylum in accordance with current American law. Do not threaten any illegal action, such as rushing the border or hopping over any fence.
 
Now here's my favorite part:

Are American liberals now going to demonize Mexicans as 'white supremacists' and 'racists' for not wanting the migrant caravan in their country???


Who can blame them for not wanting the caravan. Imagine your city or your town to be swamped by hordes.....and not only that, these migrants don't want to follow any rules! They want to impose their will.




https://thehill.com/latino/417091-v...group-from-migrant-caravan-arrives-in-tijuana



Of course, you don't see mainstream tv news channel showing this side of the migrants. CTV and CBC in Canada never brought this up.

Trump is right. They are a violent lot.

Tiajuana should round them up and push them out of the place (back to where they came from)!
That should teach them to at least, respect the laws and regulations of the places they disrupt!
 
Last edited:

Considering that the people waving the Mexican flag were Mexicans doing so in Mexico, it doesn't bother me.
 
Not sitting on the border fence mocking the border patrol would be a nice start.
 

Sure there are jobs in the USA........but, that's not up to the migrants to decide for the USA how they'll come to fill up those jobs!



It's not like as if they're the only ones who want to come to the USA.
USA can have its pick of immigrants - why settle for would-be trouble and head-aches?

If they can't - and they won't - want to follow Tiajuana's rules, what makes you think they'd respect and follow USA's laws?

Imposing your will against the country you want to migrate to - huh, that should be a big flashing red flag what kind of mentality and attitude these people have. Not good for any country!

They're only proving one thing: they're the kind of immigrants you don't wanna have!
 
Last edited:
Does anybody else consider it odd that this caravan was hundreds of miles south of Texas and took a big left turn of hundreds of miles to suddenly end up in Tijuana, walking right past open desert so they could climb a wall?
 
Does anybody else consider it odd that this caravan was hundreds of miles south of Texas and took a big left turn of hundreds of miles to suddenly end up in Tijuana, walking right past open desert so they could climb a wall?
No California is a sanctuary state and Texas is not and if you are riding in a bus or a truck the distance is much less important.
 
Does anybody else consider it odd that this caravan was hundreds of miles south of Texas and took a big left turn of hundreds of miles to suddenly end up in Tijuana, walking right past open desert so they could climb a wall?

Walking?

These people were bussed and trucked to Tijuana.
 
No California is a sanctuary state and Texas is not and if you are riding in a bus or a truck the distance is much less important.

I noticed they weren’t able to shut down the gold/silver mines in Mexico like they’ve done in hondurus. What makes me laugh is had they headed south, Nicaragua would’ve shot them for entering their country.
 
They are just trying to go to a state that will help them illegally enter and stay in the US . Texas will not do that.
 
Jim Acosta approves this message!
 
Jim Acosta wants to argue with the citizens of Tijuana. :lol:
 
Does anybody else consider it odd that this caravan was hundreds of miles south of Texas and took a big left turn of hundreds of miles to suddenly end up in Tijuana, walking right past open desert so they could climb a wall?

CA was deemed far more likely than TX to roll out the welcome mat. CA has (world famous?) sanctuary cities and TX has added military re-enforcements to the border making the via CA route into the land of rainbows and unicorns the better bet.

BTW, these folks are not walking (except for press photo OPs).
 

If what you say is true, why are wages stagnant? Why are there 100s of applicants for every job?
 

Yeah, but it would be way easier to cross the border where there is no wall/fence. You can head for California once you cross the border.

And even if you're not walking, why would you take that kind of detour? I don't go hundreds of extra miles even if I am in a car.
 

Also, Texas didn't add the troops. Trump did. If we knew they were coming, wouldn't we have noticed if they took a big left turn?
 
Walking?

These people were bussed and trucked to Tijuana.

I didn't say anything about walking. Reading is your friend.

Ok, correction, I did. Still....
 
i'd rather have Hondurans here than white nationalists. i wonder if there's a way to trade.
 
Now here's my favorite part:



Are American liberals now going to demonize Mexicans as 'white supremacists' and 'racists' for not wanting the migrant caravan in their country???

I've a thread with the same theme posted in Breaking-https://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/337468-migrants-caravan-begin-climbing-border-fence-tijuana.html

Some of the replies are rather interesting.
 
If what you say is true, why are wages stagnant? Why are there 100s of applicants for every job?

Red:
For the time being, I'll use your term "stagnant;" however, note that stagnant (unmoving) isn't at all what the price of labor has been. What wages have been is "slower moving that some wage earners would like." That said, you're hardly the only person who uses the term "stagnant" synonymously with "slow" or "slowly with regard to some reference point."

Wages that are stagnant -- not all wages are so -- because buyers of labor are unwilling to forbear/offer price increases for labor. They aren't willing to pay the higher prices because the specific productivity of the labor they buy hasn't increased.
  • Overall, worker productivity has increased; however, the productivity of low-to-medium skill labor, which is the kind of labor many (most?) immigrants such as the Hondurans in the "Caravan" will seek -- has not, and, quite frankly, will not. For example:
    • How much more productive today is an agricultural physical laborer, a housekeeper or construction crew physical laborer than was a comparable worker 40 years ago? Not much, if at all. Physically harvesting plants, cleaning spaces, laying bricks, etc. happens no faster per period of time, and with no lower error rates, than they did 40 years ago. Those physical processes can happen faster when they are enhanced with technology; however, the worker operating that technology would then have to have more skills than does a purely physical laborer, and that higher skilled worker can command a higher price for his/her labor than can the purely physical laborer.
    • How much more productive today is an auditor, writer, engineer, or researcher/analyst, for example, than s/he was 40 years ago? A lot more. Why? Because technology has been added to the productivity mix and that technology allows the worker to produce more output in a given period of time than a similar worker 40 years ago could.
  • There are a number of labor types for which prices show strong rates of increase. It's important to note, however, sometimes occupations with rapidly increasing prices may not the highest price jobs, they are types of labor buyers demand and will forbear price increases to obtain.

Blue:
There are many reasons for that phenomenon, but all of them boil down to (1) an extant gap between the nature and extent of labor supplied and that of labor demanded, (2) sellers of labor seeking greater returns, and (3) sellers ability to distribute information about their willingness to purchase labor of "this or that" nature. There are also micro rather than macro level reasons, such as:
  • Inept/inapt information consumption/application:
  • Increasing technological enhancement has reduced the demand for certain kinds of labor, thus hightening the competition for any given job in a discipline that's been technologically enhanced.
Whatever the reasons for there being many applicants for "this" job, there remain plenty of jobs in myriad places for which too few folks apply.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…