• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

(W#4255)The trial of Kyle Rittenhouse for the intentional first degree homicide of 2, injuring of 1

ASHES said:
That was not after the shooting. How can you have such a basic fact so wrong and still claim any sort of knowledge about the case?
Click to expand...

Literally watched a video of him with his hands in the air calmly walking past the police directly after the shooting....
 
US&THEM said:
He only remembers the things that help his testimony. Strange
Click to expand...
What’s “strange” about that? Of course he’s going to testify from his own perspective.
 
Very specific with every aspect except for the stuff that won’t help his story.
 
Higgins86 said:
Literally watched a video of him with his hands in the air calmly walking past the police directly after the shooting....
Click to expand...
That isn't what you claimed. You said police gave him water that he drank calmly after the shooting. That is false information.
 
ASHES said:
That isn't what you claimed. You said police gave him water that he drank calmly after the shooting. That is false information.
Click to expand...

Water was what just before, 15 mins or so? Relaxing and chilling with the Police during a riot then you see him calmly walking past the Police after the shooting cool as a cucumber.

Certainly not this little emotional mess we are watching today. Like I said he's a great little actor.
 
Higgins86 said:
Water was what just before, 15 mins or so? Relaxing and chilling with the Police during a riot then you see him calmly walking past the Police after the shooting cool as a cucumber.

Certainly not this little emotional mess we are watching today. Like I said he's a great little actor.
Click to expand...
🤦‍♂️
 
Defense done, state cross.
 
"I intended to stop the threat". Perfect answer and the prosecutor is coming off like an asshole.
 
ASHES said:
This is not true.
Click to expand...

Yes and i corrected it a couple of posts later pal. Move on

He drank water with the cops calmly chatting away, 15 mins later shot 3 ppl then immediately calmly walked past the police.
All of this is true and directly contradicts his shoe of emotion today.
 
Judge sending out the jury.
 
Higgins86 said:
Yes and i corrected it a couple of posts later pal. Move on

He drank water with the cops calmly chatting away, 15 mins later shot 3 ppl then immediately calmly walked past the police.
All of this is true and directly contradicts his shoe of emotion today.
Click to expand...
Why did you find it necessary to come in this thread and state factually incorrect information? It isn't helpful to your case.
 
Cordelier said:
You think professional hitmen are confrontational people? They're about the most mild-mannered people you will ever meet. In a crowd, you'd probably peg them for chartered accountants. What sets them apart is that they are natural killers. What they excel at is choosing their killing ground and luring their target there at the time of their choosing.

Like I said in my earlier post, I can't prove that Rittenhouse did this with Rosenbaum - it's only a suspicion. But I do know he's a killer - I can tell that by his eyes. He's got no compunctions about doing it. And his actions after shooting Rosenbaum is all the evidence I need to come to that conclusion. People who aren't trained to inflict lethal force just don't operate the way he did after killing someone unless they're a natural.
Click to expand...
Fascinating.

You should apply to the FBI.

"How did you know this was the killer?"

"He has killers eyes, sir."
 
ASHES said:
Why did you find it necessary to come in this thread and state factually incorrect information? It isn't helpful to your case.
Click to expand...

It was corrected and you you keep ignoring the point lol that he showed no emotion at all that night in any video before or after the shooting
 
While I can't watch the video at the moment (perhaps only a glimpse or two) as far as the trial is concerned, how would a reasonable juror see Rittenhouse's testimony? Harmful or helpful to the defense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom