It was You left the safety of your abode to force an armed confrontation with a man for no reason. You pulled a shotgun on some kids who were doing nothing other than partying. And, we all know you shot an innocent man.when Calamity's silly arguments get thrashed, he tries to claim what he thinks I did was "irresponsible" ...
Shot a man, and has been bragging about it in this forum for 16 years. All 'responsible' gun owners I know would never brag about shooting another human being year after year after year after year. Only 'trigger happy' types do that crap.It was You left the safety of your abode to force an armed confrontation with a man for no reason. You pulled a shotgun on some kids who were doing nothing other than partying. And, we all know you shot an innocent man.
and your response was that you would have waited until the man broke the door, entered and then shot him. Smart thinking there. And if I shot an innocent man, why was I not indicted? Oh and you forgot that the guy did go to prison as a result. So you are lying yet againIt was You left the safety of your abode to force an armed confrontation with a man for no reason. You pulled a shotgun on some kids who were doing nothing other than partying. And, we all know you shot an innocent man.
Bragging by lying about the danger faced, making his victims out to be more dangerous than they were.Shot a man, and has been bragging about it in this forum for 16 years. All 'responsible' gun owners I know would never brag about shooting another human being year after year after year after year. Only 'trigger happy' types do that crap.
Bad form to accuse a poster of criminal actions. It shows you have absolutely nothing but unwarranted and unsupported personal attacks.It was You left the safety of your abode to force an armed confrontation with a man for no reason. You pulled a shotgun on some kids who were doing nothing other than partying. And, we all know you shot an innocent man.
Yeah, much smarter is to leave the safety of the apartment to save the DOOR!and your response was that you would have waited until the man broke the door, entered and then shot him. Smart thinking there.
Family money....you always brag about that too.And if I shot an innocent man, why was I not indicted?
Cite it.Oh and you forgot that the guy did go to prison as a result.
His words. Maybe you should try paying attention instead of spouting off uninformed nonsense.Bad form to accuse a poster of criminal actions. It shows you have absolutely nothing but unwarranted and unsupported personal attacks.
What he stated was he was extremely worried about a damned apartment door being damaged. Always well thought out reasoning as to going into the unknown with a loaded firearm...lolBragging by lying about the danger faced, making his victims out to be more dangerous than they were.
No one believes the "chain" tale, especially after TD admitted the motorcycles were 100's of yards away from the scene.
TD himself admitted that the man into whose face he jammed a gun was just a drunk. Clearly, that man posed no danger to a well-armed person inside their home.
Incident #3 would not have resulted in TD jumping through hoops with "two judges, a DA and a Grand Jury," if his claims about being mugged were true.
He does it constantly.Bad form to accuse a poster of criminal actions. It shows you have absolutely nothing but unwarranted and unsupported personal attacks.
Why don't you cite it-why don't you tell people where you get your information that you misrepresent here.Yeah, much smarter is to leave the safety of the apartment to save the DOOR!
lol
Family money....you always brag about that too.
Cite it.
Sure thang...Why don't you cite it-why don't you tell people where you get your information that you misrepresent here.
age 17, some biker dudes were making a nuisance of themselves on our property. drinking smoking reefer etc so I come home from prep school in a coat and tie and see these scumbags. So I go up to the fence between our driveway and the lower lot where the biker scum were and told them to depart. One of them started walking up swinging a chain so I lifted up dad's 12 G Ithaca 37. They left peacefully
age 25, night I graduated Law school-up late at night with my brother who came up from NYC. at 2 AM someone starts banging on my door with a tire iron. So I sneak out the back door with a Walther PPK
I walked up behind the guy (my brother was calling the calvary) and said WTF are you doing. He said-kicking your ass as he raised the pipe
I stuck the gun in his nose and said drop it-he did
the cops show up-he's pissed himself
they cuff him and he starts whining I had a gun
the detective said-I know-I signed off on his permit-he should have shot your sorry ass and saved us some jail space
a year later-two mopes jump me in an alley as I was coming home from the local grocery carry some food. I gave one of them a 9mm Colonoscopy
he lived-his first date in prison was probably a bad one given the bullet blew out his rectum
Need a great reason/argument for more thorough background checks? There^ it is.Sure thang...
Statute of limitations expired years ago. No crime--->No allegation.No, I specifically quoted you, where among other accusations, you claimed he "shot an innocent man.
So, you defend irresponsible behavior with guns. Got it.You also accused him of brandishing a shotgun, threatening "kids".
Need a great reason/argument for more thorough background checks? There^ it is.
So you admit to accusing another poster of a crime. Statute of Limitations is irrelevant.Statute of limitations expired years ago. No crime--->No allegation.
Read and learn.
So, you defend irresponsible behavior with guns. Got it.
That isn't a defense. That's an observation of your dishonest accusation.Statute of limitations expired years ago. No crime--->No allegation.
Read and learn.
So, you defend irresponsible behavior with guns. Got it.
Your words, not mine.So you admit to accusing another poster of a crime....
does constantly repeating that stupid "Murr-ca"somehow make up for a lack of a valid argument. the shooter at Vegas was a federal employee with a net worth of around 10million dollars: Paddock had a valid pilot's license and TWO planes
rather than merely posting nonsense, why don't you educate us on what laws would have prevented him from carrying out his massacre given he had planned it for over a year
so tell us what laws would have stopped that-given most if not all of his guns were bought WITH-I repeat WITH a background check. I get you hate the NRA for some undetermined and most likely irrational reason.LOL … the Vegas gun maniac also owned at least 49 guns, many of them purchased just months before he mowed down the 58 sitting ducks on the Strip.
Not to mention the thousands of rounds of ammunition and the 14 or so bump stocks that the maniac accumulated. And the gun nut was apparently taking a prescription anti-anxiety drug, to boot.
In civilized countries with (much) tighter gun laws, all kinds of red flags would’ve been flyin’ up around a sick gun freak like paddock.
But here in Murr-ca, the mad-man had no problems at all purchasing numerous semi-automatic rifles and boatloads of ammo.
The filthy nra said, ‘Don’t pick on brother stevie … he has a 2a right to buy all those mass-killing machines … he’s a responsible gun owner…
Until he wasn’t…
Pure INSANITY thanks to the filthy, rotten nra and the nation's paranoid gun nuts
Murr-ca ... Undisputed Mass-Shooting Capitol of the World...
Calamity claims what I did was irresponsible without any credibility or expertise. It's nothing more than dishonest trollingThat isn't a defense. That's an observation of your dishonest accusation.
Bragging and irresponsible...Calamity claims what I did was irresponsible without any credibility or expertise. It's nothing more than dishonest trolling
Way to back up your claims, Calamity. Or at least way to back away from them.Your words, not mine.
But, please do continue defending irresponsible gun use. It soooo helps you make your case for more guns...lol
The only dishonesty here is the crap you are spewing in your trolling personal attacksBragging and irresponsible...
You should at least try to stay honest, here, TD.
Your slobbering posts that seem to only show up when TD is called out do it for me.Way to back up your claims, Calamity. Or at least way to back away from them.
Have any support for your accusations concerning me? Note that repeatedly bleating an accusation doesn't constitute support.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?