If you heard the pre-march speech by both him and Giuliani and didn't think that played a part, then we'll just agree to disagree.
Based on the phone call with Raffensperger, it's pretty clear "fair elections" are the last thing Trump was looking for. Based on his initial comment back in August that the only way he could lose is if there was election fraud makes it pretty clear "fair elections" was the last thing Trump was looking for. The only "fair election" for Trump is the one where he wins; if he doesn't then it's rigged, which is laughably silly, since there are other reasons he could lose.
I've acknowledged it, and there are irregularities during elections all of the time, but in this case all of the Federal and state agencies which have looked into it have not found evidence there was wide scale fraud or irregularities large enough to affect the outcome of the election.
We had low rejection rates, which is actually something to celebrate. The states which ramped up their mailing of ballots to all registered voters actually took the time to properly instruct people how to fill them out correctly to avoid there being user errors. So is success now bad?
Which state? In NJ it was the first time this kind of voting was conducted. The thing to remember though, is voters know how to fill out ballots, so it's not as if we were asked to develop rocket ship schematics.
Georgia went through the signature checking process and no issues were found. They recounted three times and nothing was found. A list of supposed illegal voters was researched and nothing was found.
They matter to me, which is precisely why I didn't vote for Trump. The difference between our criteria is you only focus on certain areas while I'm looking at his entire term. In case you haven't noticed, under a president who supposedly cherishes law and order, we've had quite a lack of it; including the storming of the US Capitol. Now. I'm sure you'll deflect and say it isn't his fault, but:
View attachment 67312714
Nope. It also isn't a bad thing to have politicians in politics; kind of like preferring a plumber to handle plumbing issues.
Do you
really though? Take a look at the state of the country, and the state of the GOP; do you think those are positive results? Trump has managed to lose the presidency, and lose control of the Senate. Right now he's an albatross around the neck of the party, where all of his former supporters are distancing themselves from him.
View attachment 67312715
Conversely, in 2016 you bought the dream that a businessman with a long history of bankruptcies, business failures, and a penchant for being divisive was somehow going to generate positive results. Then, you also put a governor who was about to lose his office due an unpopular discriminatory law in his state, a heartbeat away from the presidency.
As for explaining just about anything you've asked, I have done that numerous times. Your reading comprehension/memory issues are nothing I can do anything about unfortunately.