CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 108,716
- Reaction score
- 108,576
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Two of the victims...
Actually, Schumer and Pelosi are controlling YOU, if you are wanting to address magazine size. The fact is, gun people will NOT sit down to negotiate this matter as long as Schumer and Pelosi are at the table.Why are you letting Pelosi and Schumer control you?
He're another enjoying the benefits of gun ownership! Shame about the people who had to die for his fun.
7 dead, 1 critically injured after shootings at 2 farms in Half Moon Bay; suspect in custody
Seven people are dead and one is critically injured following shootings at two farms in Half Moon Bay this afternoon, a source confirmed to ABC7 News.abc7news.com
More evidence they’ve solved the gun problem in California by banning assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and ghost guns, and by requiring background checks to purchase ammunition. Perversely, even if you’re a law-abiding citizen in California and pass a background check, you can’t buy ammunition unless you own a gun that’s been registered with the state. Even then you might not be able to if the state’s Bureau of Firearms doesn’t accept you into its database for whatever reason, say because the address in its database doesn’t match what’s on your driver’s license. You can’t just borrow Uncle Fred’s Colt Python, stop by Dick’s, and head to the range. Welcome to Utopia.
If we're waiting for a change in societal attitudes in order to have a better society, I am not at all optimistic. We moved to a small city away from all of the crime, drugs, protests, and homelessness we see in other cities on the West Coast. We love our police, our neighbors, and our city managers. People are nice and life is pleasant.
There's a good reason there was tremendous white flight out of Detroit.
Actually, Schumer and Pelosi are controlling YOU, if you are wanting to address magazine size. The fact is, gun people will NOT sit down to negotiate this matter as long as Schumer and Pelosi are at the table.
I think we need to limit the manufacture of new firearms in the US.
How about when people shoot and kill other people instead of concentrating on stopping the gun, we concentrate on stopping the real problem - the people who kill and what drives them to do so. The gun is an object, it's not an object problem it's a people problem. JMO
No political benefit perceived in doing that.
Voters in San Francisco have chosen to recall embattled District Attorney Chesa Boudin following a recall effort centered on his handling of rising crime across the city.
ArlevahUnfortunately, I tend to share your sentiments. I was born and raised in suburban Los Angeles, where I was witness to crime and violence, but have lived for decades in coastal Mississippi. One of our biggest news events last year was when “Carl the Rooster,” the local downtown mascot, was murdered.
'Carl deserves our tears': Corrections officer cited in abduction, death of Carl the Rooster
Carl the Rooster was a mainstay of downtown Ocean Springs, Mississippi, where business owners would leave out water for him, the Sun Herald reported.www.usatoday.com
Apparently taxpayers. Who do you suppose pays the damages now?What insurance company in their right mind would write a liability policy on guns?
Not a tax. A bill. Those weapons that have smaller capacity to cause harm cost less to insure.That is essentially a tax. You can't tax a right.
You mean like we limit the manufacture of fentanyl and meth? You need to slap yourself out of your stupor in your alternate universe and reenter reality. There are 400 million firearms in this country. Limiting the manufacture of new ones won’t keep guns out of the hands of criminals. The only way to do that is to put violent criminals in prison or execute them, something liberals are loath to do. They’d rather disarm law-abiding citizens so criminals have something to snack on.
My cousin who dropped out of high school can make meth with stuff from Wal-mart.
It's pathetic to compare that to the manufacture of firearms.
Lots of people can do lots of things. One must consider what motivates them to choose to do so.
If politics were simple I wouldn't have to wade through countless posts trying to understand if someone is really serious, simply speculative, or even telling what is assumed to be the truth. How does one really know if you are right by urging someone to look at a Youtube video to get the truth?
When I came to read this thread I went four pages and outside of the OP there was nothing related to the actual shooting.
"I don't know what to say anymore about mass shootings in the USA."I tried. I really tried.
You can see from post 3 onwards and several times later by the poster who seemed hell bent on successfully derailing the thread and trying to block discussion that some people would rather block discussion (on a discussion board!) than go seek a topic they feel they can participate in.
For all the hero gun worshippers and all the pro gun posts I read - it wasn't an armed civilian who disarmed or stopped the shooter, it was an ordinary, scared out of his mind young man who thought he was going to die.
Have to say though, @Josie is trying to discuss and I am enjoying that. I don't have time to go into a full response to you Josie - I'm off to another fire station soon to delver more training but I'll be back sometime with responses.
Stay well SkyFox76, stay well Josie.
Every firearm that is used in a crime was manufactured legally, and sold legally at least once.
There is no such thing as an illegal gun, they were all sold legally at least once.
Arlevah
I share your concern about non-human creatures suddenly disappearing from public view. We have wild turkeys roaming our streets and some of them have become familiar to the residents up and down our streets.
But I think mass shootings of real people take precedence over worrying about an abducted rooster.
Maybe some poor family in Mississippi is thankful a rooster suddenly appeared in their kitchen.