- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
- Messages
- 20,001
- Reaction score
- 23,800
- Location
- In a box.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
How about “ … so the guy should have taken pictures of the crime in progress and called LAW ENFORCEMENT rather then incurring all the risks of foolishly taking the law into his own hands. If he had engaged the youths in a gun fire exchange, and any innocent bystanders were killed or injured, he would be, and should be held directly responsible.”So the guy should have just let the kids steal his car?
And the law is if someone brandishes a gun on you then it’s within your right to shoot at center mass until the threat is over.With that sort of attitude I don't think you deserve to be on any jury.
I have done jury duty and you have to be impartial and I don't think you can be.
AMEN!And the law is if someone brandishes a gun on you then it’s within your right to shoot at center mass until the threat is over.
I try to be optimistic, but I am not that optimistic. I predict these teems will go on to commit more, and possibly worse crimes in the future as adults.13 year olds out stealing cars and pulling out a gun. SMH I do have to feel bad they were shot because they are very much children who obviously have no positive role models in their lives but hopefully this can be a wake up call to those young boys to straighten up their lives.
And the law is if someone brandishes a gun on you then it’s within your right to shoot at center mass until the threat is over.
The man who shot at them stated to police it was because one of them brandished a gunIs there any evidence at all that these kids pointed a weapon at anyone let alone the police?
Well that's obviousThere's a huge difference between just carrying a gun and pointing it in a threatening manner.
Not required. There were 4 carjackers. Two were shot.Was a gun ever recovered from the scene as that seems like a vital detail.
No, because the car would be gone and Philly police officers have way more important things than look for a stolen car. If you call the police in most of Philly and don’t say someone has a weapon, they’re not coming. Then the guy would be out a car.How about “ … so the guy should have taken pictures of the crime in progress and called LAW ENFORCEMENT rather then incurring all the risks of foolishly taking the law into his own hands. If he had engaged the youths in a gun fire exchange, and any innocent bystanders were killed or injured, he would be, and should be held directly responsible.”
Wouldn’t that make the most sense?
In many places the crime is shooting unarmed persons who are not a physical threat.Don't do the crime then.
And many places if 1 of 4 commit murder they all 4 are charged with murder.In many places the crime is shooting unarmed persons who are not a physical threat.
There has been no evidence yet presented that 1 of the 4 pulled a gun.And many places if 1 of 4 commit murder they all 4 are charged with murder.
And so applies if 1 of 4 pulls a gun. All are at risk of being shot.
The man who shot the youths said they did.There has been no evidence yet presented that 1 of the 4 pulled a gun.
An Eye witness and the fact that 2 got away long enough to have get rid of the evidence. A lot of these teenagers pretend to be armed as well. I have watched it in the street from my bedroom window late at night. While they may think it is cool when someone with a gun feels threatened and starts shooting being cool will get you dead.There has been no evidence yet presented that 1 of the 4 pulled a gun.
I know he did, however no gun has been found.....Was there another witness?The man who shot the youths said they did.
Why would the 2 that fled throw a gun away?I know he did, however no gun has been found.....Was there another witness?
IF there was a gun, they could have. So far it appears there was no witness, and no gun. I'm not defending stealing cars. I don't support shooting unarmed kids. This story has a lot of unanswered questions.Why would the 2 that fled throw a gun away?
Fair enoughIF there was a gun, they could have. So far it appears there was no witness, and no gun. I'm not defending stealing cars. I don't support shooting unarmed kids. This story has a lot of unanswered questions.
That's about as high a heaping pile of bullshit in one answer anyone can possibly muster. If someone is stealing your car, and they are not armed, and you pull a gun on them, what the **** do you think you can do about it? Hmmm? Shoot them?!!? Only somebody with their head WAY up their own ass would think that was an appropriate response, let alone one that they could legally get away with.No, because the car would be gone and Philly police officers have way more important things than look for a stolen car. If you call the police in most of Philly and don’t say someone has a weapon, they’re not coming. Then the guy would be out a car.
The man who shot the youths said they did.
and these are positive outcomes?
sickening posts. Truly despicable.
Until a gun is recovered we only have his word that the kids had a gun.
He could be lying.
Is it worth shooting 2 people to protect?
I don't think it is no matter how nice it is.
I don't think shooting at children should be allowed to prevent car theft.
A car can be easily replaced.