Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton

[SLC]

Benghazi was nothing but propaganda peddled by Fox. Just like the death panel meme and the caravan coverage, many right wingers were near hysterics, freaking out we don't have a boarder and are being invaded, etc. All of that stuff is propaganda.

But Trump shooting his mouth off is real.

I know right? As long as your kids weren’t getting killed in Beenghazi it was just propaganda. :roll::doh

 

[Tanngrisnir]

The Democrats have been saying since Election Day all the investigations they intend to launch come January. Some have said they will seek to impeach.
Will the Democrats actually follow through on all their ruthless authoritarian Putin like tendencies? Maybe they will mellow out and be responsible.
Maybe they will follow Trump's example and NOT launch an investigation.

LOL! Literally nothing the dems are doing or have done is 'Putin-like', nor can you demonstrate otherwise.

There is plenty of credible evidence of multiple counts of criminal wrongdoing on the part of his administration, his business and his laughably charitable foundation. The House GOP turned a blind eye and/or ran interference for him, utterly failing in their duty to act as a check on the executive branch. Those days are over.

You have absolutely no clue what you're babbling about.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

People dying in Benghazi was propaganda? Interesting.

No, the breathless, head-up-the-ass Kabuki theater from the GOP that this was from treasonous, nefarious democratic coverup/conspiracy was propaganda.

Several republicans even publicly admitted that the investigations were to politically damage Clinton.

 

[SLC]

If Trump was justified we would have had a prosecution.... It doesn't seem possible that the documented evidence is meaningful but Trump has refused to act on it. ... Where is the legal paperwork?... Where is the justification that contradicts failed investigations by several branches of government?

Lol, Trump is being made into a Saudi bitch.

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

The AG is supposed to analyze the evidence and hat the FBI provides and make a legal conclusion if indictment and prosecution is required by law. The FBI overstepped it’s mandate and the AG did not do her job as required by law.

 

[Hatuey]

The AG is supposed to analyze the evidence and hat the FBI provides and make a legal conclusion if indictment and prosecution is required by law. The FBI overstepped it’s mandate and the AG did not do her job as required by law.

Lmao, we are now at 3 AGs, 2 of whom didn't act, and one who is soon to be history as well. You got any hot dreams about boxing rings to explain why after 2 years Trump has done nothing?


Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

 

[SLC]

Lmao, we are now at 3 AGs, 2 of whom didn't act, and one who is soon to be history as well. You got any hot dreams about boxing rings to explain why after 2 years Trump has done nothing?


Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

You forgot Yates. Well we all know Loretta Lynch was too busy talking with Bill about grandchildren to actually be doing her job. And Sessions recused himself from all things Russian. Hillary paid for a fake dossier that has fake intelligence from Russian agents about fake prostitutes peeing on the mattress in Trumps hotel room. And the fake dossier was illegally to misrepresent the legal need for a surveillance warrant on Carter Page. And we know Comey, Yates, McCabe, Rosenstein all signed off on those warrant apps saying the Dossier was verified when it wasn't. They also did not include exculpatory evidence in the FISA application. So Sessions was recused Yates was a Obama hack that refused to do her job and got fired for it. Rosenstein certainly isn't going to do something that might expose even more to potential criminal prosecution. An Whitaker is new on the job yet. The IG and Huber are looking into the issue let's give them a chance.

 

[Exactice]

Lmao, we are now at 3 AGs, 2 of whom didn't act, and one who is soon to be history as well. You got any hot dreams about boxing rings to explain why after 2 years Trump has done nothing?


Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

Because its "Political" Suicide. WHILE he wants to "Lock her up" There is a legimate balance that 49/51% of the nation does NOT like Trump this will upset someone and potentially take his re elections down.

IT IS Concerning though TAKING TRUMP OUT COMPLETELY.

Is it NOT the AG's Job to prosecute when the Law is broken? ITS Not their JOB to pass judgement. Thats the RIGHT of the people through a JURY. No?

Its the responsibility of the AG/Prosecutor to bring credible evidence forward.

Its the Responsibility of the Defense to refute and claims of criminal acts with credible evidence that the actions taken were NOT criminal.


Eric Holder is the ONLY AG to be held in contempt of congress. PEOPLE DIED under "Fast and Furious"

AG Lynch had an unprecedented meeting with the subjects Husband PRIOR to her interview WITH the FBI. She then and another unprecedented statement to take the recommendation OF the FBI. THAT IS NOT Standard practices right?

Session, Recuses himself from his responsibilities of AG in regards to a "SPECIAL Council" FOR WHAT? Here is the interesting real questions. About the Special Council
1) Usually special council are there to investigate a crime, which it must be done by a non partisan group. in regards to a specific allegation right? (THINKING Clinton time, Thinking Nixon time)
This special Council was to investigate, Russian Interference in the 2016 elections, THERE is NO conflict of interest or "Partisan" concern as it Affects BOTH sides and to American Democracy right? Did we actually "NEED" a special council to confirm Russian's interference? Did 17 Intelligence Agency already KNOW about this, and likely know players?
1a) SO in reality we didnt need a Special Council For Russian interference, WE all KNOW it happened. So now its .... "IF" Trump colluded with RUSSIA. WITH THAT. to apply something like this a LAW should have been broken right? A criminal act had to occur? WHAT criminal ACT did the PRESIDENT commit? Clinton lied under oath after multiple women accused him of infidelity, He also had relations IN the Physical Oval office. Nixon was CAUGHT on tape trying to obstruct justice. As well as the 5 men breaking into the DNC...... THERE was a predicate of a crime that took place.

What predicate .... that indicate TRUMP, not Papadpolouse, Not Page... Not anyone else BUT TRUMP..... That warranted the "actual" special council that NO other JUDGE, Prosecutor, Cabinet committee could NOT investigate???


So with the "Immunity" (or so called immunity) Surrounding Mueller, and then Tack on HRC and COMEY. They are some what by court of public opinion UNTOUCHABLE, even though WE all see that a predicate of a crime was comitted to AT LEAST prosecute and let a JURY make the determination if they were ACTUALLY guilty of a crime

 

[Hatuey]

You forgot Yates. Well we all know Loretta Lynch was too busy talking with Bill about grandchildren to actually be doing her job. And Sessions recused himself from all things Russian. Hillary paid for a fake dossier that has fake intelligence from Russian agents about fake prostitutes peeing on the mattress in Trumps hotel room. And the fake dossier was illegally to misrepresent the legal need for a surveillance warrant on Carter Page. And we know Comey, Yates, McCabe, Rosenstein all signed off on those warrant apps saying the Dossier was verified when it wasn't. They also did not include exculpatory evidence in the FISA application. So Sessions was recused Yates was a Obama hack that refused to do her job and got fired for it. Rosenstein certainly isn't going to do something that might expose even more to potential criminal prosecution. An Whitaker is new on the job yet. The IG and Huber are looking into the issue let's give them a chance.

That's a really cute conspiracy theory that I didn't read. Lol, who is silly enough to believe that the reason Trump is everyone's except lack of evidence? Some people believe the wildest things.

I am disappointed that no weird boxing analogies were used in the CT though.

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

You forgot Yates. Well we all know Loretta Lynch was too busy talking with Bill about grandchildren to actually be doing her job. And Sessions recused himself from all things Russian. Hillary paid for a fake dossier that has fake intelligence from Russian agents about fake prostitutes peeing on the mattress in Trumps hotel room. And the fake dossier was illegally to misrepresent the legal need for a surveillance warrant on Carter Page. And we know Comey, Yates, McCabe, Rosenstein all signed off on those warrant apps saying the Dossier was verified when it wasn't. They also did not include exculpatory evidence in the FISA application. So Sessions was recused Yates was a Obama hack that refused to do her job and got fired for it. Rosenstein certainly isn't going to do something that might expose even more to potential criminal prosecution. An Whitaker is new on the job yet. The IG and Huber are looking into the issue let's give them a chance.

LOL!

There is no evidence that the dossier or the intelligence in it is fake.
There is no evidence that is was illegally used to misrepresent anything.
They never stated is wasn't verified.
There was no exculpatory evidence.

I suggest knowing what you're talking about before actually talking.

 

[Hawkeye10]

LOL!

There is no evidence that the dossier or the intelligence in it is fake.
There is no evidence that is was illegally used to misrepresent anything.
They never stated is wasn't verified.
There was no exculpatory evidence.

I suggest knowing what you're talking about before actually talking.

That years later it has not been proven true even with a lot of people attempting to do so leads the the conclusion that it is fake and is due no consideration.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

That years later it has not been proven true even with a lot of people attempting to do so leads the the conclusion that it is fake and is due no consideration.

No, it doesn't lead to that conclusion to any rational, sober and honest adult.

"In his June 2017 Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, former FBI director James Comey called "some personally sensitive aspects" of the dossier "salacious and unverified," but he did not state that the entire dossier was unverified or that the salacious aspects were false. When Senator Richard Burr asked if any of the allegations in the dossier had been confirmed, Comey said he could not answer that question in a public setting"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Russia_dossier

 

[SLC]

LOL! Literally nothing the dems are doing or have done is 'Putin-like', nor can you demonstrate otherwise.

There is plenty of credible evidence of multiple counts of criminal wrongdoing on the part of his administration, his business and his laughably charitable foundation. The House GOP turned a blind eye and/or ran interference for him, utterly failing in their duty to act as a check on the executive branch. Those days are over.

You have absolutely no clue what you're babbling about.

How about Hillary and the RNC paying for information that came from Russian agents? That is Putin like.

 

[Herkamer63]

Fake story, fake accusation, fake news. This article has already been debunked. Move this to the Conspiracy Theories section.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

How about Hillary and the RNC paying for information that came from Russian agents? That is Putin like.

Nope. Not even remotely.

But you go ahead and pretend otherwise if you need to.

 

[Exactice]

LOL!

There is no evidence that the dossier or the intelligence in it is fake.
There is no evidence that is was illegally used to misrepresent anything.
They never stated is wasn't verified.
There was no exculpatory evidence.

I suggest knowing what you're talking about before actually talking.

Tanns! Hey,

Just for fun..... as I know our "relationship"


There is no evidence that the dossier or the intelligence in it is fake. Fair enough!, But the Dossier as not bee Verified either, Comey has stated it in open that the Dossier is unverified and salacious?
There is no evidence that is was illegally used to misrepresent anything. Currently there is NO evidence. As MOST of it is hidden behind redcations. WITH that of the RECENT release of the carter page, IT was specifically stated that, there was "SOURCE 1," There was NO other un-redacted points saying "Source 2, Source 3" Why is that? if the Dossier was NOT the only source to be used illegally or misrepresent something, why is it the ONLY un redacted source in FISA application?
They never stated is wasn't verified. Holding getting the ACTUAL video of comey saying that it was "Salacious and unverified"
There was no exculpatory evidence. IN the Dossier? Of course there would NOT be for Trump LOL!

 

[SLC]

Fake story, fake accusation, fake news. This article has already been debunked. Move this to the Conspiracy Theories section.

Nope. Not even remotely.

But you go ahead and pretend otherwise if you need to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier#Research_funded_by_Democrats_produces_dossier

The second phase of opposition research was funded by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, working through their attorney of record, Marc Elias of Perkins Coie.[9] In March 2016, Fusion GPS "approached Perkins Coie to see if its clients would be interested in paying Fusion" to continue its existing research on Trump,[31] and in April 2016, Elias hired Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump.[9][31]

Former MI6 agent Christopher Steele authored the 35-page unsubstantiated report published online in January, which alleged that blackmail against Trump was being used by Kremlin officials in an election interference plot.

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/christopher-steele-tells-fbi-sources-trump-dossier-report-article-1.3433372

Mr Steele, the co-founder of London-based Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd, prepared a 35-page document that alleges the Kremlin colluded with Mr Trump’s presidential campaign and that the Russian security services have material that could be used to blackmail him, including an allegation that he paid prostitutes to defile a bed that had been slept in by Barack and Michelle Obama.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/11/former-mi6-officer-produced-donald-trump-russian-dossier-terrified/

If Steele's sources weren't Russian spies why would they know what the Kremlin wanted to do?

During a December 2016 meeting, Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr recorded Simpson in written notes as saying that some people believed one of the allegations of collusion “but others disagree.”

More importantly, Simpson told Ohr that Steele’s main source wasn’t in Moscow but, rather, was a former Russian intelligence figure in Washington, the notes show.

“Much of the collection about the Trump campaign ties to Russia comes from a former Russian intelligence officer (? not entirely clear) who lives in the US,” Ohr wrote in his notes, quoting Simpson.

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/417535-questions-grow-about-fbi-vetting-of-christopher-steeles-russia-expertise

 

[Tanngrisnir]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier#Research_funded_by_Democrats_produces_dossier


https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/christopher-steele-tells-fbi-sources-trump-dossier-report-article-1.3433372

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/11/former-mi6-officer-produced-donald-trump-russian-dossier-terrified/

If Steele's sources weren't Russian spies why would they know what the Kremlin wanted to do?

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/417535-questions-grow-about-fbi-vetting-of-christopher-steeles-russia-expertise

Which doesn't even remotely make it Putin-like.

Stop digging. You're in too deep already.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Russia_dossier

"In his June 2017 Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, former FBI director James Comey called "some personally sensitive aspects" of the dossier "salacious and unverified," but he did not state that the entire dossier was unverified or that the salacious aspects were false. When Senator Richard Burr asked if any of the allegations in the dossier had been confirmed, Comey said he could not answer that question in a public setting."

The funding is absolutely irrelevant as you cannot demonstrate any meaningful relationship between the veracity of the material and the money.

 

[Herkamer63]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier#Research_funded_by_Democrats_produces_dossier


https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/christopher-steele-tells-fbi-sources-trump-dossier-report-article-1.3433372

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/11/former-mi6-officer-produced-donald-trump-russian-dossier-terrified/

If Steele's sources weren't Russian spies why would they know what the Kremlin wanted to do?

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/417535-questions-grow-about-fbi-vetting-of-christopher-steeles-russia-expertise

I'm not against the idea if Trump wanted to do an investigation into Hillary and Comey because they both lied under oath and had broken many laws, hell, I think Hillary should have been disqualified running for president and then prosecuted back in 2016 because she broke the law. But I think that this NYT story was never vetted. So to believe that Trump did is wrong and ridiculous because I thought I saw a report saying that this order never happened. In other words the NYT simply made it up. They're not exactly what I'd call the poster boys and girls of honesty in cases like this.

 

[Athanasius68]

LOL! Literally nothing the dems are doing or have done is 'Putin-like', nor can you demonstrate otherwise.

There is plenty of credible evidence of multiple counts of criminal wrongdoing on the part of his administration, his business and his laughably charitable foundation. The House GOP turned a blind eye and/or ran interference for him, utterly failing in their duty to act as a check on the executive branch. Those days are over.

You have absolutely no clue what you're babbling about.

Yawn. The claim is that by thinking of investigating/prosecuting Clinton, Trump is behaving like a tyrant; using his political power against political enemies.
Trump, of course, DIDNT do that. I guess we will find out if the Dems will.

 

[Carleen]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/president-trump-justice-department.html


The man who would be King. Reminds one of Nixon
The President trying to use DOJ to go after his political enemies

Now I eagerly await Trump supporters spin on this.

He knew and still does so little about the government he leads he still astounds with his ignorance.

 

[SLC]

LOL!

There is no evidence that the dossier or the intelligence in it is fake.
There is no evidence that is was illegally used to misrepresent anything.
They never stated is wasn't verified.
There was no exculpatory evidence.

I suggest knowing what you're talking about before actually talking.

Actually there is evidence it was used in the Carter Page FISA Warrant and the 3 renewal application as evidence why they needed to surveil Carter Page. All evidence must be verified BEFORE it is used for evidence to obtain a warrant to surveil an American citizen. They have email indicating they knew the dossier was unverified. They listed the fact that the DNC had funded it in an obscure footnote. They did not clearly tell the judge that one campaign had funded the opposition information in the dossier on the other campaign. They have emails that contain exculpatory evidence that the FBI?DOJ did not provide the judge. That is a fraud upon the court. That is the reason Rosenstein fought tooth and nail not to release the application to his bosses the intelligence committee.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/20/christopher-steele-hedges-russia-dossier-claims-ag/

Christopher Steele, the former British spy who fueled an ongoing investigation into President Trump’s administration, was a lot more confident of his charges when he wrote his now-notorious 2016 dossier than he is today in defending it in a libel lawsuit.

While Mr. Steele stated matter-of-factly in his dossier that collusion between Mr. Trump and the Russian government took place, he called it only “possible” months later in court filings. While he confidently referred to “trusted” sources inside the Kremlin, in court he referred to the dossier’s “limited intelligence.”

 

[SLC]

He knew and still does so little about the government he leads he still astounds with his ignorance.

Yes he naively thought Hillary And Comey should obey the law like everyone else.

 

[Carleen]

Yes he naively thought Hillary And Comey should obey the law like everyone else.

Does not mean he has the authority to put them in jail like he thought he could.

 

[JANFU]

He knew and still does so little about the government he leads he still astounds with his ignorance.

Well Mr & Mrs Khan whose son died in Astan, they have extra copies of the Constitution

 

[SLC]

Kennedy has his brother investigate the Mafia. Did you know Trump can appoint a Special Council like Mueller other presidents have done it. Obama has his AG not investigate the DACA Kids

Does not mean he has the authority to put them in jail like he thought he could.