• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump tells Iran ‘make a deal or it’s war’

I am beginning to think that DJT wants a war simply because it will put him into the history books as America's GREATEST Leader and Defender -- well, it would in his mind anyway. Such a war against Iran will be viewed as a positive by those Americans who claim Christianity must not only reduce the influence of Islam but also to 'prove' that Christianity is needed to improve the lives of all humans.
I don't think so.
Would an attack on Iran cause Russia to provide military aid? Iran has been selling enriched uranium to Russia for several years and the two countries have signed various commercial agreements including one in January of this year.
I think Iran is terrified.
 
The U.S. strikes into Laos and Cambodia, which consisted of immense amounts of ordinance, didn’t actually hinder communist forces there and in Cambodia arguably strengthened the Khmer Rouge, so that clearly isn’t even remotely true.

The U.S. didn’t invade North Vietnam because that would have been an idiotic idea.

None of which changes the reality Khe Sanh was entirely intended to be a WW2 style battle to destroy much of the NVA, and wound up being anything but.

Gee, the humiliating defeats the U.S. military suffered in Indochina shows that to be even more laughable false.
They didn’t because they were limited with large restrictions placed on them. The opposite of WW2.

Idiotic based on your bad military experience right? For give my laughing. But still the opposite of WW2

One battle does not mean the war was fought like WW2. That this needs to be explained to you shows your ignorance on ask things military.

Seeing you flail about is rather humorous. I will give you that. It must really burn you up that by virtually every single military expert the US military is considered the far and away world leader. But I am sure you know more then all them right?
 
More wails of “no no no” because you can’t handle facing reality.

If the Russians were actually as incompetent as claimed, the Ukrainians should be winning easily.

They aren’t even close.
Again you base these conclusions on nothing more than your fee fees with zero actual military experience or knowledge. That is why you get continually laughed at.
 
I am beginning to think that DJT wants a war simply because it will put him into the history books as America's GREATEST Leader and Defender -- well, it would in his mind anyway. Such a war against Iran will be viewed as a positive by those Americans who claim Christianity must not only reduce the influence of Islam but also to 'prove' that Christianity is needed to improve the lives of all humans.



Would an attack on Iran cause Russia to provide military aid? Iran has been selling enriched uranium to Russia for several years and the two countries have signed various commercial agreements including one in January of this year.

And his bullying is working out so well :rolleyes:

Ukraine...backed down on ending the war, submitting to Putin
Tariffs...backing own almost every day to China
Gaza...it all fell apart and Netanyahu is running the show again. No Riviera for the US!

Iran sees that weakness.
 
They didn’t because they were limited with large restrictions placed on them. The opposite of WW2.

Idiotic based on your bad military experience right? For give my laughing. But still the opposite of WW2

One battle does not mean the war was fought like WW2. That this needs to be explained to you shows your ignorance on ask things military.

Seeing you flail about is rather humorous. I will give you that. It must really burn you up that by virtually every single military expert the US military is considered the far and away world leader. But I am sure you know more then all them right?
They didn’t invade because doing so would have been moronic. The U.S. military couldn’t even hold supposedly friendly South Vietnam, and China would have undoubtedly directly entered the war in response.

More meaningless gigglefits because you lack even basic knowledge. Yawn.

Blind denial doesn’t actually change what the US did, no matter how much you flail.

Gee, the repeated utter failures of the U.S. military on the battlefield shows how much that claim is worth ;) 😂
 
Again you base these conclusions on nothing more than your fee fees with zero actual military experience or knowledge. That is why you get continually laughed at.
Again, no amount of sobbing “no no no murica number one no no no” changes the actual facts on the ground.

Is there a reason you think the gigglefits of people who can’t even face up to basic historical facts should matter to me?
 
They didn’t invade because doing so would have been moronic. The U.S. military couldn’t even hold supposedly friendly South Vietnam, and China would have undoubtedly directly entered the war in response.

More meaningless gigglefits because you lack even basic knowledge. Yawn.

Blind denial doesn’t actually change what the US did, no matter how much you flail.

Gee, the repeated utter failures of the U.S. military on the battlefield shows how much that claim is worth ;) 😂
Again based on assessment you make with your vast military experience. Sorry if your hear laughing in the background trust me it is not me laughing at you but at something else.

The person who tried to claim we fought Vietnam like we fought WW2 should not be talking about anyone’s lack of basic knowledge.

So again we are back to virtually every military expert on the planet’s opinion or yours. Whose expertise consists of a few weeks in basic training before being kicked out. Real hard to determine whose assessments to go with here. Hmmmmm
 
Can't imagine that would be necessary. Just taking out military, communications, government, and infrastructure facilities would probably do the trick.

It turns out the government there is deeply unpopular with its own people. Many of them are just waiting for a chance for someone to just weaken the regime's military even a little bit, and they can take it from there. If this is coordinated with dissident groups both within and outside the country, we could be looking at regime change there- and that would be a huge step towards peace and stability in the region- not to mention the world.

Recent anti-government protests in Iran:

View attachment 67565087 View attachment 67565088. View attachment 67565089
I hope you are right, but I'm not convinced, yet.

Not suggesting that you have to convince me
 
Again, no amount of sobbing “no no no murica number one no no no” changes the actual facts on the ground.

Is there a reason you think the gigglefits of people who can’t even face up to basic historical facts should matter to me?
That you think your assumptions are the same as the facts on the ground is why you constantly fail.
 
That you think your assumptions are the same as the facts on the ground is why you constantly fail.
That you can’t handle facing the repeated Ukrainian defeats is utterly hilarious.
 
Again based on assessment you make with your vast military experience. Sorry if your hear laughing in the background trust me it is not me laughing at you but at something else.

The person who tried to claim we fought Vietnam like we fought WW2 should not be talking about anyone’s lack of basic knowledge.

So again we are back to virtually every military expert on the planet’s opinion or yours. Whose expertise consists of a few weeks in basic training before being kicked out. Real hard to determine whose assessments to go with here. Hmmmmm
“Every military expert” thought the U.S. would win in Afghanistan. It was defeated and humiliated.

Hmm. Sounds like your “experts” aren’t actually that intelligent after all 😂

The U.S. absolutely did fight Vietnam as if it was World War Two, completely with a totally failed strategic bombing campaign.

Gee dude, if invading the North was going to be so easy why didn’t the increasingly desperate U.S. ever attempt it?
 
That you can’t handle facing the repeated Ukrainian defeats is utterly hilarious.
Not a single Ukrainian defeat comes close to the epic defeats that have plagued the Russian military since they decided to try and take over its neighbor.
 
Not a single Ukrainian defeat comes close to the epic defeats that have plagued the Russian military since they decided to try and take over its neighbor.
The Ukrainian offensive the West was equating to D-Day failed to achieve its minimum objectives, so that’s clearly yet another falsehood.
 
“Every military expert” thought the U.S. would win in Afghanistan. It was defeated and humiliated.

Hmm. Sounds like your “experts” aren’t actually that intelligent after all 😂

The U.S. absolutely did fight Vietnam as if it was World War Two, completely with a totally failed strategic bombing campaign.

Gee dude, if invading the North was going to be so easy why didn’t the increasingly desperate U.S. ever attempt it?
No no I am sure there are all wrong and you are the only one who is correct.
Seems really believable.

No we didn’t and the facts prove that.

That you don’t understand why is just more of your ignorance. But it doesn’t even matter as it proves that your claims that we fought vista the same as WW2 to be the lie it was.
We started the war in WW 2 with the goal of capturing Berlin. There was never an effort to capture Hanoi.
In general terms we tried to win Vietnam by forcing the NV to stop attacking the south. We fought WW2 with the intention of destroying the German military and taking over Germany. It was completely different.
 
The Ukrainian offensive the West was equating to D-Day failed to achieve its minimum objectives, so that’s clearly yet another falsehood.
Still not as massive defeat as your hero’s special military operation.
 
No no I am sure there are all wrong and you are the only one who is correct.
Seems really believable.

No we didn’t and the facts prove that.

That you don’t understand why is just more of your ignorance. But it doesn’t even matter as it proves that your claims that we fought vista the same as WW2 to be the lie it was.
We started the war in WW 2 with the goal of capturing Berlin. There was never an effort to capture Hanoi.
In general terms we tried to win Vietnam by forcing the NV to stop attacking the south. We fought WW2 with the intention of destroying the German military and taking over Germany. It was completely different.
Gee dude, as mentioned they all thought “the most powerful military ever” would win in Afghanistan, and instead it got beaten in spectacular fashion.

Hmm…the narratives aren’t adding up 😂

There was never any such attempt because invading the north would be a spectacularly dumb idea, for the reasons I already pointed out.

The pretense that China would tolerate an American invasion of North Vietnam when it didn’t do so with North Korea is hilarious, though.
 
I pointed out the fact insurgencies require civilian support to function and you started flailing, yes.
nope. you used vague weasel words. its as if you dont actually know anything specific
failed again. lol.
 
I am beginning to think that DJT wants a war simply because it will put him into the history books as America's GREATEST Leader and Defender -- well, it would in his mind anyway. Such a war against Iran will be viewed as a positive by those Americans who claim Christianity must not only reduce the influence of Islam but also to 'prove' that Christianity is needed to improve the lives of all humans.



Would an attack on Iran cause Russia to provide military aid? Iran has been selling enriched uranium to Russia for several years and the two countries have signed various commercial agreements including one in January of this year.

Only Congress has the authority to declare war. Every American should insist their Representatives and the President follow the law.

Everyone, contact your representative NOW - before the fact - and tell them you expect Congress to follow the law.

Congressional discussion and votes on going to war with Iran (or others) must be broadcast on Signal Chat. That way the world, all of us, will be able to know who said what and who voted how. :oops: ;) Let us all see how brave Congress really is.

One thing Congress and Donald Trump agree on is that the President, his children, the members of Congress and the Senate and their children and their extended family members will not be sent to war. They never are. We all know this.

If Congress votes to send us, our children, our family, our blood, our future, and buckets of our money to war THIS TIME they fecking send their own as well. No bone spurs, no exemptions, no excuses.

No more fortunate sons. No more.
 
The Russians still hold vast swathes of Ukraine. Hardly a “defeat.”
"vast". lol. more weasel words.
its as if you are incapable of making a post with specifics. lol
failed again
 
nope. you used vague weasel words. its as if you dont actually know anything specific
failed again. lol.
Not sure how much clearer I can make “insurgencies can't function without a strong degree of support from the civilian populace”.

But I get you aren’t actually able to face that reality ;)
 
I am beginning to think that DJT wants a war simply because it will put him into the history books as America's GREATEST Leader and Defender -- well, it would in his mind anyway. Such a war against Iran will be viewed as a positive by those Americans who claim Christianity must not only reduce the influence of Islam but also to 'prove' that Christianity is needed to improve the lives of all humans.



Would an attack on Iran cause Russia to provide military aid? Iran has been selling enriched uranium to Russia for several years and the two countries have signed various commercial agreements including one in January of this year.
Did you read the article or the headline?
 
Back
Top Bottom