• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Inaugural Committee Ordered to Hand Over Documents to Federal Investigators

Looks like more of an issue for Clinton than Trump but keep hoping beyond hope. 27 indictments none tying Trump to collusion!!

I only wish you could read because I'd do the George H.W. Bush line, 'read my lips'. The things that will destroy Trump will have nothing to do with Russia per se but it will have everything to do with criminal activity like money laundering, tax evasion and fraud.
 
You are truly clueless about leadership and about the law, what benefit did Putin or the Russians get out of this meeting AFTER Trump was in the Oval Office? Your cold war mentality is really just about getting Trump because of your hatred of his personality. Couldn't give a **** what you think as I will continue to celebrate the successes that have been generated the past 2 years.

The U.S. isn't withdrawing from NATO but the U.S. is requiring your country and others to meet their financial obligations which is what many are doing and that is making NATO stronger much to the chagrin of Putin, so much for your opinions

What did Putin get of Helsinki?. In terms of offers or promises no one knows because there were no other Americans in the room with Trump and Putin and that is just an outrageous breach of protocol. But he did get an American President to discredit and his own intelligence services on a stage in front of the entire world. Russia is not our friend. Putin is out to restore Russia to the former glory days of the old Soviet Union. He wants to disrupt liberal democratic governments, institutions, economic and trade order around the world that have kept the peace for the past 75 years so that he can expand Russia's sphere of influence. Crippling the cohesion of the NATO alliance would go a long way in enabling him to achieve his goals. And Trump has floated the idea of the US withdrawing from NATO out loud to members of his staff and cabinet. With the US withdrawal from INF treaty the world just became a more dangerous place than it already is.
 
I only wish you could read because I'd do the George H.W. Bush line, 'read my lips'. The things that will destroy Trump will have nothing to do with Russia per se but it will have everything to do with criminal activity like money laundering, tax evasion and fraud.

Actually you have nothing after two years so in about 6 years you will get rid of Trump. Truly is sad that someone who isn't even in this country has such hatred of our President and so ignorant of basic civics and economic results. Going to be fun watching you people the next 6 years and then have Trump replaced by another Republican President because of the economic and foreign policy results generated. We apparently need a few more radical Democrats trying to destroy the very economic system that created their wealth so they motto will be "I have mine, the hell with you!"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cl...ren-worth-millions-new-financial-records-show

Your holier than thou attitude and liberal arrogance is on full display here as corruption only matters when it may be associated with a Republican. Obama and Clinton are immune
 
I already know your ears don't hear but are your eyes not working either?

Paul Manafort - indicted
Michael Cohen - pleaded guilty
Michael Flynn - pleaded guilty
George Papadopoulos - pleaded guilty
Rick gates - pleaded guilty
Alex Van der Zwaan - pleaded guilty
Richard Pinedo - pleaded guilty
Konstantin Kilmnik -indicted
Roger Stone - indicted
13 Russian Nationals - indicted
12 Russian Military Officers - indicted

How many of those anything to do with "collusion"?

BTW, an indictment isn't a conviction.
 
What did Putin get of Helsinki?. In terms of offers or promises no one knows because there were no other Americans in the room with Trump and Putin and that is just an outrageous breach of protocol. But he did get an American President to discredit and his own intelligence services on a stage in front of the entire world. Russia is not our friend. Putin is out to restore Russia to the former glory days of the old Soviet Union. He wants to disrupt liberal democratic governments, institutions, economic and trade order around the world that have kept the peace for the past 75 years so that he can expand Russia's sphere of influence. Crippling the cohesion of the NATO alliance would go a long way in enabling him to achieve his goals. And Trump has floated the idea of the US withdrawing from NATO out loud to members of his staff and cabinet. With the US withdrawal from INF treaty the world just became a more dangerous place than it already is.

What did Putin get from obama on his open mike comments with the President of Russia? Double standard? I will take the U.S. economic results and NATO results as an indication of what Putin got, a stronger NATO and stronger U.S. Floating the idea is far from actually doing it but then rhetoric is what drives people like you not actual results.

NATO countries are now fulfilling their obligations to NATO taking the burden off the U.S. and that is a great thing, NATO Stronger because of Trump!!

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/stoltenberg-nato-engages

I am sure this benefits Putin
 
Actually you have nothing after two years so in about 6 years you will get rid of Trump. Truly is sad that someone who isn't even in this country has such hatred of our President and so ignorant of basic civics and economic results. Going to be fun watching you people the next 6 years and then have Trump replaced by another Republican President because of the economic and foreign policy results generated. We apparently need a few more radical Democrats trying to destroy the very economic system that created their wealth so they motto will be "I have mine, the hell with you!"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cl...ren-worth-millions-new-financial-records-show

Your holier than thou attitude and liberal arrogance is on full display here as corruption only matters when it may be associated with a Republican. Obama and Clinton are immune

He'll never be re-elected. What you're calling 'liberal arrogance' is in reality people that you see against Trump. Yes, we are opposed to his regime and hopefully we can pull this country through this crisis over the next two years without any long-lasting damage. 'Corruption' is Trump's middle name and always has been. I've known about this NY thug for many more years than you ever will.
 
How many of those anything to do with "collusion"?

BTW, an indictment isn't a conviction.

BTW, pleading 'guilty' is an automatic conviction.

Manafort, convicted and awaiting sentencing.

Popadapoulas, convicted.

Alex van der Zwann, convicted and sentenced to 30 days, then deported out of the U.S. and told not to come back.

Michael Flynn, pleaded guilty, soon to be sentenced.

Rick Gates, pleaded guilty to conspiracy, to be sentenced.

Richard Pinedo, pleaded guilty and convicted and serving six months in prison.
 
BTW,

Manafort, convicted and awaiting sentencing.

Popadapoulas, convicted.

Alex van der Zwann, convicted and sentenced to 30 days, then deported out of the U.S. and told not to come back.

Michael Flynn, pleaded guilty, soon to be sentenced.

Rick Gates, pleaded guiltyto conspiracy, to be sentenced.

Richard Pinedo, pleaded guilty and convicted and serving six months in prison.

Not one single conviction was related to "Russian collusion".
 
How millions of Americans think it is a good idea to fully trust someone who created Trump University, bankrupted a casino, and started a mortgage company at the peak of a housing bubble is just beyond me.

Dupes will be dupes.
 
"Federal law prohibits foreign contributions to federal campaigns, political action committees and inaugural funds."

Your answer suggests you believe it's quite likely that inaugural committee members knowingly accepted illegal foreign donations. So a fair question is if committee members knowingly accepted illegal foreign donations and then proceeded to lie under oath about them, why would they do that?

Incorrect. My answer "suggests" that regardless of whether or not that inaugural committee accepted foreign donations (legal or otherwise) its irresponsible for any prosecutor to go after anyone for the trivial, especially when the letter of the law is irrelevant to the prevention of the "corruption" to its aim.
 
Incorrect. My answer "suggests" that regardless of whether or not that inaugural committee accepted foreign donations (legal or otherwise) its irresponsible for any prosecutor to go after anyone for the trivial, especially when the letter of the law is irrelevant to the prevention of the "corruption" to its aim.

That...made literally no sense whatsoever.
 
If foreign actors are attempting to buy influence by donating to an inauguration, why is that "dumber than dumb?" Are you OK with that?

If foreign actors were seriously attempting to compromise election law, why isn't Mueller the one doing the investigation under his original charge? His "pass" to the southern district indicates this has little to do with foreign interface (except as a pre-text) and more to do with the endless ritual of creating crime by inducing lying to agents and making the trivial a political issue.

I have nothing against investigation any clear violation by foreign actors and their consequential work with politicians or their representatives, you know, like this:

Calls for an independent counsel

President Clinton's FBI Director Louis Freeh wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Attorney General Janet Reno in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an independent counsel."[46]

In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, Charles La Bella, sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fund-raising abuses by Democratic party officials.[47]

...In his report to Reno he wrote: " [A] pattern [of events] suggests a level of knowledge within the White House—including the President's and First Lady's offices—concerning the injection of foreign funds into the reelection effort." Additionally, La Bella stated: "If these allegations involved anyone other than the president, vice president, senior White House or DNC and Clinton-Gore '96 officials, an appropriate investigation would have commenced months ago without hesitation."[49]

Robert Conrad, Jr., who later became head of the task force, called on Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fund-raising practices of Vice President Gore.[50]


Janet Reno declined all requests: …

...The same poll found that 47 percent of Americans believed a quid pro quo existed between the Clinton administration and the PRC government.[52]

Criticism of investigation...

FBI agent Ivian Smith wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh that expressed "a lack of confidence" in the Justice Department's attorneys regarding the fund-raising investigation. He wrote: "I am convinced the team at... [the Department of Justice] leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up to the task... The impression left is the emphasis on how not to prosecute matters, not how to aggressively conduct investigations leading to prosecutions." Smith and three other FBI agents later testified before Congress in late 1999 that Justice Department prosecutors impeded their inquiry. FBI agent Daniel Wehr told Congress that the first head U.S. attorney in the investigation, Laura Ingersoll, told the agents they should "not pursue any matter related to solicitation of funds for access to the president. The reason given was, 'That's the way the American political process works.' I was scandalized by that," Wehr said. The four FBI agents also said that Ingersoll prevented them from executing search warrants to stop destruction of evidence and micromanaged the case beyond all reason.[56]

FBI agents were also denied the opportunity to ask President Clinton and Vice President Gore questions during Justice Department interviews in 1997 and 1998 and were only allowed to take notes. During the interviews, neither Clinton nor Gore were asked any questions about fund-raisers John Huang, James Riady, nor the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple fund-raising event led by Maria Hsia and attended by John Huang and Ted Sioeng.[57] (Wiki)

So when I read that on the thin and unsupported speculation of Trump collusion with Russians that a witchhunt is launched with a special council that expands his vision far beyond its purpose, and district prosecutor is charged with finding other trivialities for an inaguaral party occurring AFTER the election is over...WELL the politically motivated shifting of standards speaks for itself.

It's an arbitrary and political lawfare farce.
 
Last edited:
He'll never be re-elected. What you're calling 'liberal arrogance' is in reality people that you see against Trump. Yes, we are opposed to his regime and hopefully we can pull this country through this crisis over the next two years without any long-lasting damage. 'Corruption' is Trump's middle name and always has been. I've known about this NY thug for many more years than you ever will.

You spend way too much time in forums with people who think like you, who is going to defeat him? Each of the announced candidates now are out lefting each other and are totally clueless like you appear to be on the U.S. economy and national security issues. We have a President who finally isn't taking any of the leftwing crap

The crisis that you claim exists is 2 trillion added to GDP, 4.7 million jobs created, record tax revenue to the states and local governments, record charitable contributions. You have yet to post anything to support your opinion so you are nothing but hot air and hot air doesn't generate results
 
Here are the jobs Obama created and those include part time for economic reasons. You seem to want to ignore bls.gov. why is that?



does part time for economic reasons resonate in that alternate universe in which you live

Are you disputing the numbers I provided from the Bureau of Labor Statistics?
 
It is my opinion that there are paid operatives of both parties that part of their job is to post in political sites to support the left or right ideology, the problem with the left is none of the official data supports your contention so you have to post leftwing opinion pieces without data in context to boost the left claims. I happen to believe you are one of those operatives.

You can believe in the Faerie Kingdom for all I care about it. I provide stats from the Bureau of Labor . You don't like it? Fine with me.
 
You can believe in the Faerie Kingdom for all I care about it. I provide stats from the Bureau of Labor . You don't like it? Fine with me.
Context is the issue not bottom line stats, part time jobs vs full time jobs both are included in total employment you are celebrating part time job creation

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Context is the issue not bottom line stats, part time jobs vs full time jobs both are included in total employment you are celebrating part time job creation

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The same source - Bureau of Labor Statistics - using the same methodology - reports that Obama created about the same number of Jobs that Trump has in his first two years. Trump inherited the Obama success wave and has been riding it.

Again - you don't like it? Fine with me.
 
The same source - Bureau of Labor Statistics - using the same methodology - reports that Obama created about the same number of Jobs that Trump has in his first two years. Trump inherited the Obama success wave and has been riding it.

Again - you don't like it? Fine with me.
Still didn't acknowledge that you are s Democrat operative and this is part of your job. Trump 2 years 4.7 million Obama 8 years 6 million, hardly the same

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Still didn't acknowledge that you are s Democrat operative and this is part of your job. Trump 2 years 4.7 million Obama 8 years 6 million, hardly the same

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Your numbers are wrong. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says so.

It makes me smile that you think somebody sends me money to post here. You amuse me. :roll:;)
 
The Mueller investigation isn't the only investigation that Trump and his team of conspirators need to fear, it's the Southern District of NY that's going to be more trouble for them that Robert Mueller. They're looking for 'straw donors' such as foreign money being given to the inaugural committee to influence Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/04/us/politics/trump-inaugural-committee-subpoena.html

[h=1]Trump Inaugural Committee Ordered to Hand Over Documents to Federal Investigators[/h]
President Trump’s inaugural committee was ordered on Monday to turn over documents about its donors, finances and activities to federal prosecutors in Manhattan, according to two people familiar with their investigation into the committee’s activities.


A lawyer working with the inaugural committee received a subpoena on Monday evening seeking documents related to all of the committee’s donors and event attendees; any benefits handed out, including tickets and photo opportunities with the president; federal disclosure filings; vendors; contracts; and more, one of the people said.

This will surely take Trump down. If not, they can always fall back on the fact that Trump drove his golf cart on the green.
 
This will surely take Trump down. If not, they can always fall back on the fact that Trump drove his golf cart on the green.

Either that or he took dark money from Deutsche Bank loans from Russia oligarchs that murder people. Oh and by the way, he was just rejected by Deutsche Bank, the last bank that would loan him money, now even they are turning him down, he's a bad risk.
 
Trump Inaugural Committee Ordered to Hand Over Documents to Federal Investigators

Good. I'm dying to learn from whence came and what happened to the record sum of money his committee raised because there's no way all or nearly all of it went to pay for the dull ass inauguration events they put on. We have some sense of the latter, but not much re: the former.


It’s very possible that I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it.
-- Donald Trump, "What Does Donald Trump Really Want"​
 
This will surely take Trump down. If not, they can always fall back on the fact that Trump drove his golf cart on the green.

Trump has already been "taken down". Now the issue is whether we can get him out sooner then four years.
 
If foreign actors were seriously attempting to compromise election law, why isn't Mueller the one doing the investigation under his original charge? His "pass" to the southern district indicates this has little to do with foreign interface (except as a pre-text) and more to do with the endless ritual of creating crime by inducing lying to agents and making the trivial a political issue.

I have nothing against investigation any clear violation by foreign actors and their consequential work with politicians or their representatives, you know, like this:

Not interested in your whataboutism, but how do you know it's a pretext? Why would Whitaker sign off on a warrant to his boss if it's a witch hunt? The SDNY USA is a Trump appointee. Weird that he's out to get his boss or his minions on nothing....

And Mueller's task was to investigate Russian interference in the campaign and any coordination with the Trump campaign. The foreign actors who might have used straw men to contribute could be Russians or others. So you don't have a clue why SDNY took this case versus Mueller. SDNY prosecuted Cohen in part so the leads might have come through SDNY and there was nothing for Mueller TO pass off.

So when I read that on the thin and unsupported speculation of Trump collusion with Russians that a witchhunt is launched with a special council that expands his vision far beyond its purpose, and district prosecutor is charged with finding other trivialities for an inaguaral party occurring AFTER the election is over...WELL the politically motivated shifting of standards speaks for itself.

It's an arbitrary and political lawfare farce.

The problem is you're assuming what they're looking at is "trivialities" and you don't have any way of knowing that. It's especially odd here because the inauguration books are a complete mess, including the donor records, they raised a huge amount of money (doubled the previous record), from unlimited donations, and practically invited influence peddlers to do their best to corrupt the incoming administration with their 7 figure donations. So you take a process that BEGS for corruption, then what isn't kept secret is so chock full of errors, some of them intentional, scores of unknown donors, plus the hall of fame crew of crooks and con men surrounding Trump, and conclude it must be a clean effort. Bizarre.... :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom