How can something be "grotesque and bizarre" but mainstream as written in the OP? To me, grotesque and bizarre would be any animal/human sex acts, that's probably not very common though .. . I hope. :mrgreen:
I also would probably think it strange if I walked in on a significant other getting it on with a blow up doll, that would just be bizarre though, not really too gross. :lol:
Ummmm... You do exactly that all the time; often in the most insultingly judgmental and confrontational way possible. :screwy
No one in this thread has so far taken any kind of overtly judgmental "high horse" stance with regards to sexuality. We've simply stated what we're not into, and the reasons why.
"You do it too" is not a justification for your argument, and you have done more than just simply state what you're not into. You have criticized certain practices as unhealthy or unnatural. Please stop posting lies.
Because those are the reasons that I avoid them. It fits with the OP.
I haven't told anyone else that they shouldn't behave as they like.
But those practices are neither unhealthy or unnatural.
What you're missing is that when it comes to preferences, one doesn't need a reason other than "Not interested" or "don't like it"
Both of which are simply opinionated value judgments on your part. Value judgments, I might add, that you are currently attempting to "shame" the rest of us into accepting.
You're not even following your own stated philosophy here.
Additionally, I would point out that potentially dangerous behavior like "fisting" and the use of mechanical instruments to achieve orgasm are both pretty much the definition of "unnatural."
Nope, they are not value judgements
It is a clear and obvious fact that preferences are nothing more than liking one thing more than another, so the only "justification" they need is a statement that one prefers one over the other.
Walking is a potentially dangerous behavior, and the use of mechanical instruments for sexual gratification has been observed in a number of species.
Cuddling after sex is just gross.
Any woman who tries to kiss me after a blowjob is gonna catch a bitch-slap. Just sayin'.
Go brush, then kiss me.
Why would her hair being unkempt affect your desire to kiss her?
A large number of people might think anal sex is grotesque at least. That doesnt mean a large number of people dont engage in the act, making it 'mainstream'.How can something be "grotesque and bizarre" but mainstream as written in the OP? To me, grotesque and bizarre would be any animal/human sex acts, that's probably not very common though .. . I hope. :mrgreen:
I also would probably think it strange if I walked in on a significant other getting it on with a blow up doll, that would just be bizarre though, not really too gross. :lol:
On the other hand, though, my husband isn't 'small' - so maybe the real point is that he's not average. Sex use to be excruciatingly painful sometimes, to the point where I'd avoid it (and that was after having a few kids) - and now it's not.
So - I don't know, if he was small, maybe I'd notice . . . and for those few guys, maybe that's the issue
For the porno chicks - I don't know what to say, only that maybe forcing sex when you're not actually turned on (because trust me, it's a job, not a pleasure for them) does something. I don't have those issues, so I can't say much beyond that. I have sex when I'm turned on - as it's supposed to be. My sex without toys far outnumbers the times we have sex with other things involved - but it's all fun in the end.
Being married to "mandingo" probably would make a bit of a difference in that regard, yes. :lol:
As I said before, I can't speak to your sex life or the size and frequency of anything you use (nor would I want to). If it works for you, I'm glad to hear it. More power to you.
I was simply saying that it's not really my thing, and that the sheer size of some of the "objects" used by women in pornography strikes me as being more than a little worrisome as far as regular sexual functionality is concerned (i.e. you can't tell me, for instance, that a woman who can casually take a baseball bat up the hoohah is going to go home that night and be even remotely satisfied by any guy packing a mere six or seven inches downstairs).
For the record, I'm not totally opposed to "marital aids" like vibrators and dildos either. I've never really had a use for them, but I wouldn't have a problem keeping one around for special occasions either.
I'm just not real big on the "fetishization" of the practice that I have observed in a lot of couples in my generation.
However, I do agree with your previous assessment that this is all ultimately a matter of "to each their own."
"fetishization" - I don't think some people use sex toys as often as they claim, for one thing. I think there's a "I'm sexually free!" stigma - and if they claim to be part of this "free" crowd they're "cool" (read = posers)
Anyone that ****s or pisses on their lover or enjoys being **** or pissed on.
And I mean literally.
Does that include pissing the bed after a three-day bender?
Honestly, anal is something which has always struck me as being better "in theory" than in practice. :lol:
Yes. BTW, Mrs. Case called, she said to get off the computer and go wash your linens.
That's what she gets for purchasing a man before he's housebroken.
View attachment 67152138
More seriously though, I've never actually tried it.
I've been tempted to ask a couple of times (during doggy, 69, and the like), but I've always ultimately wound up chickening out. :lol:
I tried to tell her to stay away from the clearance rack. She just doesn't listen!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?