- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 21,659
- Reaction score
- 11,742
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I thought it might be useful for those interested in the current furore over Blair's memoirs and the ensuing interviews to have a thread that tied everything together.
Starting off with the Guardian (There's two interviews)
I felt this particular tidbit is important, he's not mincing words here - he beleives we should actively prevent Iran getting hold of Nuclear Weapons and despite the obvious double standard (we have them so they can't) I do agree.
Starting off with the Guardian (There's two interviews)
--snip--
Asked the classic judge's question — if he would have done anything differently in retrospect — he replies it is "very difficult to answer that". But he wishes he had seen earlier that 9/11 had "far deeper roots" than he thought at the time.
"The reason for that, let me explain it, is that in my view what was shocking about September 11 was that it was 3,000 people killed in one day but it would have been 300,000 if they could have done it. That's the point ... I decided at that point that you cannot take a risk on this. This is why I am afraid, in relation to Iran, that I would not take a risk of them getting nuclear weapons capability. I wouldn't take it.
"Now other people may say, come on, the consequences of taking them on are too great, you've got to be so very careful, you'll simply upset everybody, you'll destabilise it. I understand all of those arguments. But I wouldn't take the risk of Iran with a nuclear weapon."
--snip--
The Guardian Exclusive
I felt this particular tidbit is important, he's not mincing words here - he beleives we should actively prevent Iran getting hold of Nuclear Weapons and despite the obvious double standard (we have them so they can't) I do agree.