• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stop the Madness!!!!!

nathanjames1791

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
227
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Can someone explain to me why we are talking about contraceptives???

Seriously gas is at its highest point ever this early in a year.

The interest on the national debt will soon be more than what we spend on medicare and medicaid combined.

The Iranians seem bent on causing a far reaching war.

And what do you hear about in the news? What is the left so up in arms about?

The fact that Rick Santorum is a catholic and that becuase of that he doesn't like contraceptives. where in the world are we??? Did I get transported back to the 50's when you couldnt be a president if you were catholic?

And yes this is about religion, dont even try and say it isn't becuase what the frick does it matter if Rick wont ever use a condom to you the voter? Nothing. The left wants to make it out like this is about contraception but thats rediculous. Santorum does NOT want to outlaw contraception, so you can all get your panties out of a bunch. This is all just a hit piece to make sure a real conservative doesnt run against Obama.
 
Ding ding ding we have a winner.
You win a new car!!!
nice car.webp
yeah thats the real reason, not that anyone will admit it, but what really annoys me is how everyone has taken the bait. Even the conservatives are only covering this story. Its driving me mad.
 
They had little else to biiiitch about. It's the GOP attempting to turn the Catholic and Evangilical votes away from Obama. And we ain't seen nothing yet. Wait until their candidate is picked, and then it's "Katie barr the door," for the nasty anti-Obama commercials we will see then.
 
Can someone explain to me why we are talking about contraceptives???

Seriously gas is at its highest point ever this early in a year.

The interest on the national debt will soon be more than what we spend on medicare and medicaid combined.

The Iranians seem bent on causing a far reaching war.

And what do you hear about in the news? What is the left so up in arms about?

The fact that Rick Santorum is a catholic and that becuase of that he doesn't like contraceptives. where in the world are we??? Did I get transported back to the 50's when you couldnt be a president if you were catholic?

And yes this is about religion, dont even try and say it isn't becuase what the frick does it matter if Rick wont ever use a condom to you the voter? Nothing. The left wants to make it out like this is about contraception but thats rediculous. Santorum does NOT want to outlaw contraception, so you can all get your panties out of a bunch. This is all just a hit piece to make sure a real conservative doesnt run against Obama.

I did not know we could only talk about one thing at a time. Maybe I am just especially talented in being able to walk and chew bubblegum at the same time...but I doubt it.
 
Can someone explain to me why we are talking about contraceptives???

Because the GOP can't run on foreign policies when under the Obama administration they took out Bin Laden, Khadafi, Hosni Mubarak and easily took out some Somali pirates on multiple occasions on rescue missions.

Because the GOP can't run on economic policies because our economy is most definitely on the rebound.

So social whining is all they believe they got left.
 
Because the GOP can't run on foreign policies when under the Obama administration they took out Bin Laden, Khadafi, Hosni Mubarak and easily took out some Somali pirates on multiple occasions on rescue missions.

Because the GOP can't run on economic policies because our economy is most definitely on the rebound.

So social whining is all they believe they got left.
Ding, ding, ding.
 
Because the GOP can't run on foreign policies when under the Obama administration they took out Bin Laden, Khadafi, Hosni Mubarak and easily took out some Somali pirates on multiple occasions on rescue missions.

Because the GOP can't run on economic policies because our economy is most definitely on the rebound.

So social whining is all they believe they got left.

LOL. Obama did not take out Hosni Mubarak, that is untrue. The Egyptian people took out Hosni Mubarak, the Obama administration co-opted the protests

Due to being inspired by the success of the Tunisian protests, the Egyptian people launched their own protest movement, calling for the overthrow of US puppet Hosni Mubarak. However, the US was busy co-opting the protest movement.

The US used the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as a cover to help co-opt the protest movement. Ironically, the NED is not used for the spreading of democracy, rather it was established by the Reagan administration to aid in the overthrow of foreign governments, after the CIA’s covert operations were revealed. The NED was supported “As a bipartisan endowment, with participation from the two major parties, as well as the AFL-CIO and US Chamber of Commerce, the NED took over the financing of foreign overthrow movements, but overtly and under the rubric of ‘democracy promotion.’” [6] Thus, the US supported both Mubarak and the protesters, in a bid to make sure that no matter what occurred, America would still get its way.

The civil society groups had a major influence on Egyptian activists as in May 2009 the activists

"spent a week in Washington receiving training in advocacy and getting an inside look at the way U.S. democracy works. After their training, the fellows were matched with civil society organizations throughout the country where they shared experiences with U.S. counterparts. The activists [wrapped] up their program this week by visiting U.S. government officials, members of Congress, media outlets and think tanks." [7] (emphasis added)



Thus, due to the US aiding the activists, the Americans ensured that the protesters owed them a debt and that US interests would be secure even if Mubarak was ousted.​


(Arab Spring: Revolutions, Lies, and Intervention)

In regards to Libya, that was nothing but a media campaign of lies and deceit. There was no investigation into if the accusations against Gaddafi even held any weight. For example:

"Human rights organisations have cast doubt on claims of mass rape and other abuses perpetrated by forces loyal to Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, which have been widely used to justify Nato's war in Libya." (Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war - Africa - World - The Independent)

"Still, the rebels have offered their own far-fetched claims, like mass rapes by loyalist troops issued tablets of Viagra. Although the rebels have not offered credible proof, that claim is nonetheless the basis of an investigation by the International Criminal Court." (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/wo...pagewanted=all)

"There have been no confirmed cases of that; supposedly there are many African prisoners of war being held in Benghazi, but conveniently journalists are not allowed to see them.There are, however, African guest workers, poorly paid migrant labor, many of whom, unarmed, have been labeled mercenaries." (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/wo...pagewanted=all)

In addition to this, there was little to no talk in the MSM about the rebels killing black Africans

"Across eastern Libya, rebel fighters and their supporters are detaining, intimidating and frequently beating African immigrants and black Libyans, accusing them of fighting as mercenaries on behalf of Kadafi, witnesses and human rights workers say.

In a few instances, rebels have executed suspected mercenaries captured in battle, according to Human Rights Watch and local Libyans." (Blacks In Libya | Libyan rebels accused of targeting blacks - Los Angeles Times)​


But the West did have a UN Mandate, thus they went in and bombed Libya and overthrew Gaddafi even though that last part was overstepping the UN mandate.
 
Can someone explain to me why we are talking about contraceptives???

Seriously gas is at its highest point ever this early in a year.

The interest on the national debt will soon be more than what we spend on medicare and medicaid combined.

The Iranians seem bent on causing a far reaching war.

And what do you hear about in the news? What is the left so up in arms about?

The fact that Rick Santorum is a catholic and that becuase of that he doesn't like contraceptives. where in the world are we??? Did I get transported back to the 50's when you couldnt be a president if you were catholic?

And yes this is about religion, dont even try and say it isn't becuase what the frick does it matter if Rick wont ever use a condom to you the voter? Nothing. The left wants to make it out like this is about contraception but thats rediculous. Santorum does NOT want to outlaw contraception, so you can all get your panties out of a bunch. This is all just a hit piece to make sure a real conservative doesnt run against Obama.
Contraception is an issue easily fixed. Or, makes a great distraction. Pick one, or both. Regardless, none of the others are solvable anytime soon, so they don't want us focused on them.
 
LOL. Obama did not take out Hosni Mubarak, that is untrue. The Egyptian people took out Hosni Mubarak, the Obama administration co-opted the protests

Due to being inspired by the success of the Tunisian protests, the Egyptian people launched their own protest movement, calling for the overthrow of US puppet Hosni Mubarak. However, the US was busy co-opting the protest movement.

The US used the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as a cover to help co-opt the protest movement. Ironically, the NED is not used for the spreading of democracy, rather it was established by the Reagan administration to aid in the overthrow of foreign governments, after the CIA’s covert operations were revealed. The NED was supported “As a bipartisan endowment, with participation from the two major parties, as well as the AFL-CIO and US Chamber of Commerce, the NED took over the financing of foreign overthrow movements, but overtly and under the rubric of ‘democracy promotion.’” [6] Thus, the US supported both Mubarak and the protesters, in a bid to make sure that no matter what occurred, America would still get its way.

The civil society groups had a major influence on Egyptian activists as in May 2009 the activists

"spent a week in Washington receiving training in advocacy and getting an inside look at the way U.S. democracy works. After their training, the fellows were matched with civil society organizations throughout the country where they shared experiences with U.S. counterparts. The activists [wrapped] up their program this week by visiting U.S. government officials, members of Congress, media outlets and think tanks." [7] (emphasis added)



Thus, due to the US aiding the activists, the Americans ensured that the protesters owed them a debt and that US interests would be secure even if Mubarak was ousted.​


(Arab Spring: Revolutions, Lies, and Intervention)

In regards to Libya, that was nothing but a media campaign of lies and deceit. There was no investigation into if the accusations against Gaddafi even held any weight. For example:

"Human rights organisations have cast doubt on claims of mass rape and other abuses perpetrated by forces loyal to Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, which have been widely used to justify Nato's war in Libya." (Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war - Africa - World - The Independent)

"Still, the rebels have offered their own far-fetched claims, like mass rapes by loyalist troops issued tablets of Viagra. Although the rebels have not offered credible proof, that claim is nonetheless the basis of an investigation by the International Criminal Court." (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/wo...pagewanted=all)

"There have been no confirmed cases of that; supposedly there are many African prisoners of war being held in Benghazi, but conveniently journalists are not allowed to see them.There are, however, African guest workers, poorly paid migrant labor, many of whom, unarmed, have been labeled mercenaries." (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/wo...pagewanted=all)

In addition to this, there was little to no talk in the MSM about the rebels killing black Africans

"Across eastern Libya, rebel fighters and their supporters are detaining, intimidating and frequently beating African immigrants and black Libyans, accusing them of fighting as mercenaries on behalf of Kadafi, witnesses and human rights workers say.

In a few instances, rebels have executed suspected mercenaries captured in battle, according to Human Rights Watch and local Libyans." (Blacks In Libya | Libyan rebels accused of targeting blacks - Los Angeles Times)​


But the West did have a UN Mandate, thus they went in and bombed Libya and overthrew Gaddafi even though that last part was overstepping the UN mandate.

My bad. Didn't mean to imply that he did take him out. But that Mubarak was taken out and the US didn't step in and assist his reign and instead supported the protests.

The rest of your post trying to go on about what the Arab Spring was... kind of was a bit of overkill in an off-topic fashion. Thanks anyways.

Gaddafi... I didn't say anything about right or wrong. I said he was removed with the assistance of the Obama administration and the right isn't about to go to the left of Obama for fear of looking weak on foreign policy.
 
Because the GOP can't run on foreign policies when under the Obama administration they took out Bin Laden, Khadafi, Hosni Mubarak and easily took out some Somali pirates on multiple occasions on rescue missions.

Because the GOP can't run on economic policies because our economy is most definitely on the rebound.

So social whining is all they believe they got left.

You could have saved yourself a lot of typing by simply saying "OBAMA 2012".
 
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing by simply saying "OBAMA 2012".


Not voting for Obama actually. But I'm not blind to reality. If you remove your partisan blinders maybe you won't get nauseous so easily.

Actually have my vote currently bouncing between 2 possibilities. On from the Justice Party and the other is actually a Republican. Just not any of the crazy nerd-fest we've seen in the GOP debates thus far.

 
Last edited:
yeah thats the real reason, not that anyone will admit it, but what really annoys me is how everyone has taken the bait.

So, you are on the right spot to debait politics. :mrgreen:
 
Yknow I've been waiting patiently for this administration to offer up free peanut butter for a long time now. For all Americans unless your allergic, but they must have a different priority list. For what its worth Obama please put PB on the priority list along with beer and you will have my vote. I appreciate the free contraceptives though...
 
They had little else to biiiitch about. It's the GOP attempting to turn the Catholic and Evangilical votes away from Obama. And we ain't seen nothing yet. Wait until their candidate is picked, and then it's "Katie barr the door," for the nasty anti-Obama commercials we will see then.
What??? How is a GOP canidate getting smeared being done by the GOP to get Obama? not that there wont be anti-obama commercials, but dont think the liberals are going to play nice either.
 
I did not know we could only talk about one thing at a time. Maybe I am just especially talented in being able to walk and chew bubblegum at the same time...but I doubt it.
No you miss the point, I could care less if they talk about one thing, what I want is for them to talk about something at least moderately important. What Santorum's personal religious views are have absolutely nothing to do with what is going on in America right now. The truth is they cant find anything else to smear santorum on so they are going after his religion and it is just really sad that they have to go their, in my opinion.
 
Because the GOP can't run on foreign policies when under the Obama administration they took out Bin Laden, Khadafi, Hosni Mubarak and easily took out some Somali pirates on multiple occasions on rescue missions.

Because the GOP can't run on economic policies because our economy is most definitely on the rebound.

So social whining is all they believe they got left.
oops I forgot it was Obama who shot Bin laden! my bad I guess I will relect him.
Also this is the liberals whining obviously. The Gop would not whine against their own canidate (do i really have to keep pointing that out). It is the Liberals who are trying to pull away from the issues.
 
No you miss the point, I could care less if they talk about one thing, what I want is for them to talk about something at least moderately important. What Santorum's personal religious views are have absolutely nothing to do with what is going on in America right now. The truth is they cant find anything else to smear santorum on so they are going after his religion and it is just really sad that they have to go their, in my opinion.

that's not really true, santorum is putting his religion out there rather vehemently, and no one is going after due to his religion, he's being questioned because of his rather radical views. additionally, he's gone after obama's religion, as well. and you know what? that's politics. truthfully, i think santorum is probably an ok guy, but he's got no ideas about our economy, which is by far our most important issue.
 
Can someone explain to me why we are talking about contraceptives???

Seriously gas is at its highest point ever this early in a year.

The interest on the national debt will soon be more than what we spend on medicare and medicaid combined.

The Iranians seem bent on causing a far reaching war.

And what do you hear about in the news? What is the left so up in arms about?

The fact that Rick Santorum is a catholic and that becuase of that he doesn't like contraceptives. where in the world are we??? Did I get transported back to the 50's when you couldnt be a president if you were catholic?

And yes this is about religion, dont even try and say it isn't becuase what the frick does it matter if Rick wont ever use a condom to you the voter? Nothing. The left wants to make it out like this is about contraception but thats rediculous. Santorum does NOT want to outlaw contraception, so you can all get your panties out of a bunch. This is all just a hit piece to make sure a real conservative doesnt run against Obama.

Are you kidding me? EVery liberal I know is praying that Rick Santorum runs against Barack Obama.
 
oops I forgot it was Obama who shot Bin laden! my bad I guess I will relect him.
Also this is the liberals whining obviously. The Gop would not whine against their own canidate (do i really have to keep pointing that out). It is the Liberals who are trying to pull away from the issues.

The GOP would not 'whine' against their own candidate? Really? Tell that to Gingrich, Romney, and all the rest.

And I think you can reveal your 'leaning' now. It's no longer a secret.
 
Back
Top Bottom