• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Spokane county shelter adopts out pit bull, kills 4 year old boy


^^ This.
 

1 child a day dies from swimming pools. Are we going to ban swimming pools next?
 
Nonsense. Pits are no more dangerous than other large dogs. Shit happens. That's life
 
1 child a day dies from swimming pools. Are we going to ban swimming pools next?
I said in an earlier post in this thread that all pools built where there are kids should have mandatory fences...

If you want to argue that all Pit Bulls have to wear jaw guards/masks at all time as an equivalent then I could see that.

Otherwise... *shrug*
 
Other then the massive selective breeding for aggressive violence?
 

Well since we are talking about pit bulls it matters in that context.
 
Other then the massive selective breeding for aggressive violence?
Massive selective breeding? Prove your claim with some numbers from a reputable source.
Then try to put a little love in your heart. The world will be a better place.

 

Where I live all pools do have a fence requirement or some sort of requirement that keeps people from easily entering the pool water. Personally I think people who have a pit bull should also have to have some sort of licence or training or awareness program associated with the dog. That doesn't mean I would trust the dog but it could help cut down on the lackadaisical approach to owning a dangerous animal.
 
As someone who has been bitten by a few dogs over the years, I believe some dogs are just plain aggressive, as our some people.

This breed seems to have a reputation, perhaps unfairly.

Personally I am a cat person, a cats aggression has never resulted in requiring stitches.
 
....animal “rights” extremists have taken over local animal shelters....
A brief review of the article you link to reveals that your rendition of this story is inexcusably false and misleading. Basically, you lay blame on the wrong organization.

Nevertheless, I do agree that pitbulls should be outlawed, and breeding pitbulls should also be outlawed.
 
How about including Rottweilers?
  • 45 fatal attacks from period of the study
  • Protective of family but not visitors, wanted or not
  • Powerful with a bad temper
  • 328 PSI bite force
German Shepherds?
  • History of deadly attacks
  • 20 deaths from the study
  • Aggressive and territorial
  • 238-291 PSI bite force
American Bulldog?
  • Powerful, muscular build
  • Responsible for 15 deaths
  • 3.5% of fatal dog attacks in study
  • 305 PSI bite force
Bullmastiff?
  • 3.2% of fatal dog attacks in the study
  • Weigh up to 130 pounds
  • Able to cause severe damage
  • 552 PSI bite force
Siberian Huskie?
  • 3% of fatal attacks
  • Record of attacking adults and children
  • Strong survival instincts
  • 320 PSI bite force
All of the above have a bite force higher than the typical Pittie (235 PSI)

The 14 Most Dangerous Dog Breeds
 

I already posted something on different dog breeds that are dangerous. Since this thread was focused on pit bulls that's where I tried to stay.
 

I couldn't agree more.

I also believe when any dog is adopted, truthful, background information should be mandatory.

When any strong dog such as a bulldog is paired with an irresponsible owner it has negative effects on the dog's behavior and causes trauma and is not the dog's fault.
No different than when an abusive, irresponsible parent raises a child
 
Last edited:
I already posted something on different dog breeds that are dangerous. Since this thread was focused on pit bulls that's where I tried to stay.
Considering that breed labels at animal shelters are wrong 75% of the time, I was pointing out the impracticality of your solution. Forgive me if it sounded personal but I've been doing advocacy work for the local shelter for a good number of years and pitties are the least understood and the most subjected to public bias out of all the mixes of breeds that come through our doors.
 
I couldn't agree more.

I also believe when any dog is adopted, truthful, background information should be mandatory.
We don't get any background information on the strays we take in. All we can provide is a behavioral assessment and anectdotals of the dog's demeanor when acting with staff and volunteers while at the shelter. We also screen our adopters based on their experience with particular breeds, the age of family members and the presence of other animals in the home.
When any strong dog such as a bulldog is paired with an irresponsible owner it has negative effects on the dog's behavior and causes trauma and is not the dog's fault.
No different than when an abusive, irresponsible parent raises a child
No disagreement there.
 

After all things considered so for in my mind on this topic. It does seem like pit bulls are the poster dog of dangerous animals. That is evident to me in that there are so many dogs listed on the lists both yours and mine. I think it's irresponsible for people to just be given a dangerous dog without proper vetting of the family and dog and training. I think I understand the heart of someone who does dog advocacy but I would always advocate for safety over expediency.
 
Well since we are talking about pit bulls it matters in that context.

No actually it doesn’t matter. You are complaining about pit bulls making you uninsurable. That then opens the door to conversations about how the insurance company levies many things against you that make you uninsurable.
 
His lard and master hates dogs too...first time in a long time there was no dog at the WH. Dogs sense evil.
 
Yet Pits kill and maim more people than all these breeds combined. No one cares about nerd charts with bite force. This isn’t relevant.
 
Massive selective breeding? Prove your claim with some numbers from a reputable source.
Then try to put a little love in your heart. The world will be a better place.

View attachment 67487132
I’m going to presume you mean every single statistical analysis of dog attacks ever as well as the indisputable history of the breed and it’s evolution through bear baiting to dog fighting is not “reputable” right?
 
It says exactly what I wrote, a month before the fatal attack that killed Kline the city passed a resolution banning the use of euthanasia for dangerous dogs
 
That's what our local shelter tries to do, but maybe they are the exception?
 
I tend to love yorkies and pomeranians when they arent raised by fashion show freaks.
I've wanted a little yorkie for a while. Our neighbors had one - Rocky - and he was a great little dog. Went hiking with her and the other dogs and was very confident and friendly. Unfortunately he escaped out of his fence and was hit by a car....

And I think you're right - people who raise them as dogs, socialized, with appropriate boundaries, versus accessories or little toys, can end up with great little companions. I've met many out, at the park, restaurants, etc. that I'd love to bring home, if we didn't already have two dogs...

Here's a great story - a yorkie found during WWII that survived battles, etc...

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…