But you implied it by disputing what someone determined based on what was presented in court and elsewhere. You said that:
What happens in a court room has to do with determining "based on the law"...
...But it does not determine the truth of the details surrounding the case nor does it make moral judgement's. So the verdict does not establish as truth whether or not George Zimmerman was racially motivated
The fact is, there are some aspects that can be determined from a trial which a judgment can be rendered and in the Zimmerman case, the question of racial motivation happens to be one of them. There are a ton of things going back to when he was a child, all the way up to the present day that clearly indicate the man is
not a racist and does not harbor any ill will toward black people, or anyone else. Neither the state of Florida, or the FBI could find anything at all indicating that Zimmerman was in any way a racist or embraced any racial hatred or biases.
Based on the FACTS it's very reasonable for a person to assess that Zimmerman is a racist, and what took place that night had nothing to do with racial bias or hatred, and therefore had nothing to do with why Trayvon Martin ended up dead.