I realize any actual change would require a change to the Constitution. But for the sake of discussion, and regardless of what you think about the current President, do you think there should be a change to the duration and number of terms a President should be able to serve?
While I do think 4 years is a little on the short side, I don’t think a President should be wasting any of his or her time running for reelection. I think a decent rule would be that the POTUS should serve a single 6-year term and no more.
What say you?
Let the voters decide who stays in office or not.
12-16 years and we have a deal. I want the American people to be left with no doubts as to who is responsible for what, when, where, and why, and the only way to do that is to have a term stretch out for over a decade.
I realize any actual change would require a change to the Constitution. But for the sake of discussion, and regardless of what you think about the current President, do you think there should be a change to the duration and number of terms a President should be able to serve?
While I do think 4 years is a little on the short side, I don’t think a President should be wasting any of his or her time running for reelection. I think a decent rule would be that the POTUS should serve a single 6-year term and no more.
What say you?
I realize any actual change would require a change to the Constitution. But for the sake of discussion, and regardless of what you think about the current President, do you think there should be a change to the duration and number of terms a President should be able to serve?
While I do think 4 years is a little on the short side, I don’t think a President should be wasting any of his or her time running for reelection. I think a decent rule would be that the POTUS should serve a single 6-year term and no more.
What say you?
Haven't the "voters" proven numerous times that they can't be trusted to do what's right?
I live in Delaware. Biden was re-elected so much it took a VP position to finally get him out of office.
Names like Kennedy, Thurmond, and Byrd should be enough to warrant term limits.
No good can come from having people running this country for multiple decades.
Corruption and abuse of power are too much for people to rise above when it becomes a lifetime career.
I fully support term limits.
One senator should not be able to have more power than another senator nor should a congressman be allowed to have more power than another congressman.
I realize any actual change would require a change to the Constitution. But for the sake of discussion, and regardless of what you think about the current President, do you think there should be a change to the duration and number of terms a President should be able to serve?
While I do think 4 years is a little on the short side, I don’t think a President should be wasting any of his or her time running for reelection. I think a decent rule would be that the POTUS should serve a single 6-year term and no more.
What say you?
This is the only instance of term limits that I support. The Presidency has grown in power so much since WWII, that we call him "The Leader of the Free World." IMO, that's too much power to hold for too long of a period of time. Especially without the input of the rest of the "Free World" that he is apparently the leader of.
I've considered if a 6 year term is OK, but I think it's best to have a referendum on his performance once in a while.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?