Or the fact that Saddam did not have nuclear weapons to strike back against people who oppose his military decisions.Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?Or the fact that Saddam did not have nuclear weapons to strike back against people who oppose his military decisions.
Saddam did not have a functional nuclear program, despite the lies told by Dubya and Colin Powell. We knew that he didn't but they would not have sold the war to the American people if they had admitted that fact.Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?
wrong war pards.Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?
Saddam was a problem, but he wasn't intent on putting back together the Soviet Union yet.Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?
That’s exactly why.Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
Probably cause the military calculus is entirely different and Putin has nukes.Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
Yes, he was talking about bio and chemical weapons. We knew with certainty that Sadam did not have nukes. As it turns out, he had nothing, and Bush made a huge mistake. One of the biggest most brutal lies thrust on the global community of all time.Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?
Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?
This is also why Iran wants nuclear weapons. Not for an offensive role but instead for defensive purposes, mostly Israel. No country that is part of the nuclear club has ever been invaded.Saddam didn’t have nuclear weapons. That’s it.
Wrong Iraq war. This is the first one.Didn't W sell some americans on the lie saddam had weapons of mass destruction so we could invade iraq? Did we ever find any?
This is also why Iran wants nuclear weapons. Not for an offensive role but instead for defensive purposes, mostly Israel. No country that is part of the nuclear club has ever been invaded.
Is it possible oil plays into the decision making?
They are both members of the nuclear club, and it was never a full-scale invasion. It's small terrorist attacks and border pissing matches, usually over the disputed Khasmir region.Except India/Pakistan.
Eventually, no-one on the UN Security Council vetoed authorization for invasion. It's pretty much impossible to 'legally' use force against five countries in the world no matter what they do... same goes for those they choose to protect.The reason isn't nuclear weapons. Both the US and Russia are willing to risk everything- they have been for decades. It took seven months of Iraqi occupation of Kuwait before direct military intervention happened.