• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ridge accuses Bush White House of political use of terror alert system

There's also a rule against harrassment, I believe. Maybe you should check it out since you're so anal about the rules?

If you feel I am harassing you, feel free to contact a mod.
 
If you feel I am harassing you, feel free to contact a mod.

I have, but since you're in the click, I'm sure it won't do any good.
 
I have, but since you're in the click, I'm sure it won't do any good.

Maybe it won't do any good because you are not being harraseed
 
Is this really a matter of debate? I remember being told I was unpatriotic because I didn't believe in the "War on Terror." I was literally yelled at because I was "unpatriotic." It freaking blows my mind to think people still defend Bush on the grounds that Obama is worse, when there should be serious investigations into things like this. If there are grounds for an investigation, what is wrong with an investigation, especially if the administration supposedly has nothing to worry about. Oh, because it is in the past.

I can hire a non govt group to assassinate people, or use terror to sway the collective support for myself, or show pictures of hospitals and warehouses and call them chemical weapons factories so long as it happened in the past. Let's move on! David Berkowits might have had a great argument if he just said Ted Bundy was worse and that it's in the past.

The law is the law...
 
Well, since it doesn't read "Bush rose the terror alert to influence the election" I'm guessing that Bush refused to give in to his aides' pressure. Good for him

No, according to the story it was Ridge and others who pulled Donald Scumsfeld aside and talked him out of a really bad and corrupt idea.

The fact that it was even floated is really scary.

Don't pat W. on the back for any pre-election decisions. Remember, he didn't declare himself the 'decider' until after the 2004 election.
 
Good thing they wrote lots of letters so we could know.
 
Ridge did NOT accuse the Bush White House of political use of terror alert system

The quote from Ridge's book that has the left celebrating stated:

“There was absolutely no support for that position within our department. None.” He then says, “I wondered, ‘Is this about security or politics?’ "

Notice he doesn't point any fingers, reference any incidents or conversations, nor does he offer evidence of any kind to back up that claim.

There's a reason for this... It's because it was just a passing thought based on the fact that he didn't feel the threat level needed to be raised. It wasn't an accusation.

The reason I know it wasn't an accusation, is because Ridge stated very definitively earlier in the book, when addressing allegations that political pressure had been applied to raise threat levels, said:

"Let me make it very clear. I was never directed to do so no matter how many analysts, pundits or critics say so."

So there you have it...

All this false hype is designed to appeal to Bush haters on the left, to sell a few books.

.
 

Just wondering, could you actually show us where you got those quotes?
 
Ridge did NOT accuse the Bush White House of political use of terror alert system.

Politicization is exactly what it seems to be. From the book:

 

Ridge's comments are speculative hyperbole???? BRILLIANT!!!!!

No matter how many former Bush officials come out of the woodwork and tell their stories they will always end up being lying villains to you.

You're a hilarious little guy that's for sure!

:rofl:rofl:rofl
 

Next tactic will be: but the liberals did it!
 


Reading comprehension problem?
 
Reading comprehension problem?

I would ask you the same question.

 
There's no evidence of law breaking.
 
How could it win them the election if they never even did it? The reason I said it was serious was that I thought Ridge accused Rumsfeld and Ashcroft of overtly attempting to politicize the alert system. Now it looks like Ridge never even made that accusation. Either way, the alert level wasn't raised.
 
Just wondering, could you actually show us where you got those quotes?

I got them from an article published by The American Spectator. Here is a relevant excerpt from that piece:


.
 
In Afganistan, they are comming off of heightened alert, because they raised the threat level because of the election.

The same thing was done in Iraq.

And I would not be surprised if President Obama has it raised in 2012 during the next election.

Political? No. This is simply a target date that would get terrorists a greater amount of coverage of their act, and would disrupt our political process.

Duh!

However, the difference is that I will not be going around accusing the President of raising the level for political gains.
 
They didn't have to, they instead released a months old video of Bin Laden less than a week before the election. That video is probably what killed Kerry's chances.

This is a blatant lie.


[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Osama_bin_Laden_video]2004 Osama bin Laden video - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

The US not only had nothing to do with the release of this video, they actively tried to prevent it.

Got any more conspiracy theories you want to throw out there?
 

You've kind of hit the nail on the head with this post. Because this is how the MSM operate... take a non-story and turn it into a story by confusing facts until the majority of the public believe a whole alternate version of history.


:2wave:
 
Next tactic will be: but the liberals did it!

Did what exactly? They had a meeting and nothing was done to change the levels. Ridge had a spider sense tingly feeling and the world turns upside down?

If anyone finds solid evidence of anything illegal PLEASE prosecute....otherwise..stfu
 
Last edited:

I wasn't trying to specify the terrorist alert level at the time of the election, but more the approach the Bush campaign took to get re-elected. Things like saying that only Bush will keep America safe, and all of the other bull**** that the American people ate up.
 
The American voter shouldn't have to wonder what their President is lying about.

There was once a time where that Office was a symbol of honor, courage, and leadership by example, NOT power...

It all depends how you view history. And, how far back you go.

The nature of politics is to influence others to obtain your goal. Thus, you have to con to get what you want. If you con, you have to bend the truth, or over enhance the truth, which in itself is a lie.
 
I'm not GOP, and I am smacking his ass. He lied during his campaign. Said he was going to bring decency back to the White House. He didn't.

Please share how he lied?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…