- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,993
- Reaction score
- 60,557
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
There's also a rule against harrassment, I believe. Maybe you should check it out since you're so anal about the rules?
If you feel I am harassing you, feel free to contact a mod.
I have, but since you're in the click, I'm sure it won't do any good.
Maybe it won't do any good because you are not being harraseed
Well, since it doesn't read "Bush rose the terror alert to influence the election" I'm guessing that Bush refused to give in to his aides' pressure. Good for him
Good thing they wrote lots of letters so we could know.When was this? 300 years ago? You do know that Washington and Jefferson were still politicians regardless of all the beautiful things they were right? Their anatomy, brain waves and general humanity were not that much different then yours or mine. They still lied, played tricks and brought as much drama to the executive office as other President. The only difference is that back then C-SPAN wasn't around and their every word, thought or belief could not be scrutinized.
Ridge did NOT accuse the Bush White House of political use of terror alert system
The quote from Ridge's book that has the left celebrating stated:
“There was absolutely no support for that position within our department. None.” He then says, “I wondered, ‘Is this about security or politics?’ "
Notice he doesn't point any fingers, reference any incidents or conversations, nor does he offer evidence of any kind to back up that claim.
There's a reason for this... It's because it was just a passing thought based on the fact that he didn't feel the threat level needed to be raised. It wasn't an accusation.
The reason I know it wasn't an accusation, is because Ridge stated very definitively earlier in the book, when addressing allegations that political pressure had been applied to raise threat levels, said:
"Let me make it very clear. I was never directed to do so no matter how many analysts, pundits or critics say so."
So there you have it...
All this false hype is designed to appeal to Bush haters on the left, to sell a few books.
.
Ridge did NOT accuse the Bush White House of political use of terror alert system.
Ridge writes that there was a "vigorous, some might say dramatic, discussion" about raising the threat level. He says his aides told the White House that doing so would politicize national security.
"I believe our strong interventions had pulled the 'go-up' advocates back from the brink," Ridge writes. "But I consider the episode to be not only a dramatic moment in Washington's recent history, but another illustration of the intersection of politics, fear, credibility and security."
"After that episode, I knew I had to follow through with my plans to leave the federal government for the private sector," Ridge, who resigned soon after the election...
More speculative hyperbole from the Left. I guess you missed this part of the story so I used a much bigger crayon:
UPDATE: Bush's former homeland security adviser, Frances Townsend, told the Associated Press today that politics never played a role in determining alert levels. She noted that in the weeks before the electio two videotapes, including one from al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, were released that she said contained "very graphic" and "threatening" messages.
"Never were politics ever discussed in this context in my presence," she said.
Asked if there was any reason for Ridge to have felt pressured, Townsend told the AP: "He was certainly not pressured. And, by the way, he didn't object when it was raised and he certainly didn't object when it wasn't raised."
Ridge's comments are speculative hyperbole???? BRILLIANT!!!!!
No matter how many former Bush officials come out of the woodwork and tell their stories they will always end up being lying villains to you.
You're a hilarious little guy that's for sure!
:rofl:rofl:rofl
Damn. I thought it was odd how after Bush was reelcted all those "terror alerts" went away.
Seems the GOP have proven themselves to be much, much worse than anything we could have imagined.
If history is written correctly, this will be seen as the time when the GOP lost all credibility and never, ever regained power as a party ever again.
UPDATE: Bush's former homeland security adviser, Frances Townsend, told the Associated Press today that politics never played a role in determining alert levels. She noted that in the weeks before the electio two videotapes, including one from al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, were released that she said contained "very graphic" and "threatening" messages.
"Never were politics ever discussed in this context in my presence," she said.
Asked if there was any reason for Ridge to have felt pressured, Townsend told the AP: "He was certainly not pressured. And, by the way, he didn't object when it was raised and he certainly didn't object when it wasn't raised."
Reading comprehension problem?
Ridge writes that there was a "vigorous, some might say dramatic, discussion" about raising the threat level. He says his aides told the White House that doing so would politicize national security.
"I believe our strong interventions had pulled the 'go-up' advocates back from the brink," Ridge writes. "But I consider the episode to be not only a dramatic moment in Washington's recent history, but another illustration of the intersection of politics, fear, credibility and security."
"After that episode, I knew I had to follow through with my plans to leave the federal government for the private sector," Ridge, who resigned soon after the election...
There's no evidence of law breaking.Is this really a matter of debate? I remember being told I was unpatriotic because I didn't believe in the "War on Terror." I was literally yelled at because I was "unpatriotic." It freaking blows my mind to think people still defend Bush on the grounds that Obama is worse, when there should be serious investigations into things like this. If there are grounds for an investigation, what is wrong with an investigation, especially if the administration supposedly has nothing to worry about. Oh, because it is in the past.
I can hire a non govt group to assassinate people, or use terror to sway the collective support for myself, or show pictures of hospitals and warehouses and call them chemical weapons factories so long as it happened in the past. Let's move on! David Berkowits might have had a great argument if he just said Ted Bundy was worse and that it's in the past.
The law is the law...
How could it win them the election if they never even did it? The reason I said it was serious was that I thought Ridge accused Rumsfeld and Ashcroft of overtly attempting to politicize the alert system. Now it looks like Ridge never even made that accusation. Either way, the alert level wasn't raised.I agree, and this type of dictatorial behaviour does seem to be a common theme under the Bush administration. I think it's important for the American people to ensure that this type of governance does not happen again, and this is why is important that the truth come out.
As far as whether this won them the election, I don't know. I doubt it, but it still might have played a role with some folk. Historically, instilling fear in a population has proven to work.
Just wondering, could you actually show us where you got those quotes?
In October of 2004, a videotaped message from Osama Bin Laden surfaced. There were mere days until the election. There was, of course, a Homeland Security meeting. According to Ridge, an internal consensus was reached that they did not need to raise the threat level to orange. Security was heightened already in advance of the election, but had not been officially designated as a new threat level. Then the decision was brought to a security meeting with the FBI, the State Department, the Defense Department and so on. According to Ridge, Ashcroft argues for raising the threat level, while Ridge argues against. Here is the apparent money quote:
"I wondered, 'Is this about security or politics?'"
He wondered. "There was no consensus reached at that session, and we took it upon ourselves to keep it that way," he concludes, which I can only assume is what we are supposed to call "thwarting" a "plan" to raise the alert level.
It is possible, at this point, that you find none of this very definitive. But that is OK, because Tom Ridge has a definitive statement for you. Earlier in the book, addressing the allegations that political pressure had been applied to raise threat levels, Ridge has this to say:
"Let me make it very clear. I was never directed to do so no matter how many analysts, pundits or critics say so."
That is very clear indeed, Secretary Ridge.
They didn't have to, they instead released a months old video of Bin Laden less than a week before the election. That video is probably what killed Kerry's chances.
On October 29, 2004, at 21:00 UTC, the Arab television network, Al Jazeera, broadcast excerpts from a videotape of Osama bin Laden addressing the people of the United States
...
According to the Agence France-Presse, U.S. diplomats in Qatar were given a copy of a videotape of al-Qaida leader, Osama bin Laden, before it aired on Al-Jazeera television; the diplomats unsuccessfully sought to prevent the Arabic-language network from broadcasting it.[3] The United States State Department requested that the government of Qatar (where Al Jazeera is located) discourage the station from airing the videotape, according to a senior State Department official.
How could it win them the election if they never even did it? The reason I said it was serious was that I thought Ridge accused Rumsfeld and Ashcroft of overtly attempting to politicize the alert system. Now it looks like Ridge never even made that accusation. Either way, the alert level wasn't raised.
Next tactic will be: but the liberals did it!
How could it win them the election if they never even did it? The reason I said it was serious was that I thought Ridge accused Rumsfeld and Ashcroft of overtly attempting to politicize the alert system. Now it looks like Ridge never even made that accusation. Either way, the alert level wasn't raised.
The American voter shouldn't have to wonder what their President is lying about.
There was once a time where that Office was a symbol of honor, courage, and leadership by example, NOT power...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?