• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Retard says she would rather die than defend herself with a gun.

blaxshep said:
Being a pacifist is retarded.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily, I'm a pacifist but not extreme in that. I actually enjoy competitive fights like a sparring match and things like that but I detest true violence. Extreme pacifism that sacrifices self interest is not good, but when there is a middle ground such as only engaging in force to stop harm it's a good thing.
 
American said:
No, not the way you're saying it, but if she doesn't protect her own life she's a retard.
Click to expand...

Again, no. If she was a pacifist then she would not use a gun to protect herself. That does not make on retarded.
 
soccerboy22 said:
No. If I am a true pacifist then it is not retarded.
Click to expand...

It is still retarded.You would be basically ignoring your natural instinct for self preservation over some idiotic idea that you shouldn't use lethal force or any other act of violence to save your life.
 
jamesrage said:
It is still retarded.You would be basically ignoring your natural instinct for self preservation over some idiotic idea that you shouldn't use lethal force or any other act of violence to save your life.
Click to expand...

She is just ignorant. Of course if someone was attacking her, she would fight with whatever was available. That's just instinct.
 
I have zero problem with this lady deciding not to protect or defend her life with a gun..... that's a choice she is free to make.

I hope she is never victimized, but if she is... well, she made her choice.. it's hers to live or die with.

I would hope she, and people like her, would afford the rest of us the right to make a different decision... but as we can see lately, that's not very high on the anti-gunners agenda.
 
Thrilla said:
I have zero problem with this lady deciding not to protect or defend her life with a gun..... that's a choice she is free to make.

I hope she is never victimized, but if she is... well, she made her choice.. it's hers to live or die with.
Click to expand...

It's called Natural Selection
 
soccerboy22 said:
Again, no. If she was a pacifist then she would not use a gun to protect herself. That does not make on retarded.
Click to expand...
She wants to impose her pacifism onto others, which was the whole purpose of the demonstration.

That makes her retarded.
 
Jerry said:
She wants to impose her pacifism onto others, which was the whole purpose of the demonstration.

That makes her retarded.
Click to expand...

trying to impose her personal choices on others.. especially through public policy... is certainly problematic.
 
Jerry said:
She wants to impose her pacifism onto others, which was the whole purpose of the demonstration.

That makes her retarded.
Click to expand...

Agreed. However, my point was being a pacifist does not make one retarded. It just makes one a pacifist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom